Secondary listing for deceased-donor kidney transplantation does not increase likelihood of engraftment at a large transplant center.

The supply of donor organs has not increased as fast as has the number of patients awaiting kidney transplantation. Few organs are shared outside the areas of recovery. This trend has caused some ESRD patients to seek listing at multiple centers. We examined UNOS registry data and transplant registry data at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) for the 576 patients listed at multiple centers over an 8-year span ending December 31, 2005. We identified 72 multilisted patients who received a deceased-donor renal allograft at UAB and reviewed their records for demographics, HLA matching and transfer of listing time. The only predictors for transplantation at UAB were initial listing at UAB or transfer of waiting time. Fifty-one of the 72 patients had listed at UAB first; the other 21 had transferred waiting time. None of the 176 patients who listed elsewhere first and did not transfer waiting time had been transplanted at UAB. Aggregate cost of listing and evaluation for the 176 patients listed elsewhere first who did not transfer waiting time was $1 254 528. Secondary listing at UAB, with a large cohort awaiting transplantation, without transfer of waiting time from another center was an expensive and futile process.

The number of amino acid residues mismatches correlates with flow cytometry crossmatching results in high PRA renal patients.

Highly sensitized renal transplant candidates present a group at high risk for acute and chronic rejection. The probability of finding compatible donors for these recipients is significantly lower in comparison to those who have low PRA values. As a consequence, these patients spend longer time on the waiting list and become tethered to dialysis. The results of final cross match (XM) are critical for making a decision about whether such a candidate receives an organ or not. The degree of donor and recipient HLA compatibility predicts the results of XM. The goal of this study was to expand a variety of acceptable HLA-AB mismatches (MM) for high PRA kidney recipients using the HLAMATCHMAKER algorithm. This strategy focuses on the fine structural features of HLA polymorphism comprising amino acid residues or triplets (AAT), which are located in alpha-helical coils of HLA molecules and are available to antibodies. We analyzed serum samples from thirty-nine highly alloimmunized recipients (PRA > or = 85%). The level of sensitization was detected using FlowPRA Class I Screening Test. This group of transplant candidates included thirteen recipients who demonstrated negative results of final T/B FCXM and twenty-six, who were FCXM positive. The application of the HLAMATCHMAKER algorithm based on the HLA class I donor and recipient typing allowed us to detect the total number of AATMM as well as the number of immunogenic AAT in both FCXM negative and FCXM positive groups of recipients. Significantly greater numbers of both total and highly immunogenic AATMM have been emerged in the group of FCXM positive patients. Furthermore, the results of this analysis have shown a high degree of probability of positive FCXM if the number of highly immunogenic AATMM was > or = 1 (chi(2) = 22.9 Yate's correction; p = 0.000001). We did not observe overlapping between antibody specificity and permissible HLA-AB MM detected using the HLAMATCHMAKER strategy. Thus, the number of highly immunogenic AATMM can serve as a reliable predictive value for final FCXM results in highly sensitized renal transplant candidates. The HLAMATCHMAKER algorithm appears to be the proper strategy to find donors for high PRA recipients.

Effect of preoperative sonographic mapping on vascular access outcomes in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Current DOQI guidelines encourage placing arteriovenous (AV) fistulas in more hemodialysis patients. However, many new fistulas fail to mature sufficiently to be usable for hemodialysis. Preoperative vascular mapping to identify suitable vessels may improve vascular access outcomes. The present study prospectively evaluated the effect of routine preoperative vascular mapping on the type of vascular accesses placed and their outcomes. METHODS: During a 17-month period, preoperative sonographic evaluation of the upper extremity arteries and veins was obtained routinely. The surgeons used the information obtained to plan the vascular access procedure. The types of access placed, their initial adequacy for dialysis, and their long-term outcomes were compared to institutional historical controls placed on the basis of physical examination alone. RESULTS: The proportion of fistulas placed increased from 34% during the historical control period to 64% with preoperative vascular mapping (P < 0.001). When all fistulas were assessed, the initial adequacy rate for dialysis increased mildly from 46 to 54% (P = 0.34). For the subset of forearm fistulas, the initial adequacy increased substantially from 34 to 54% (P = 0.06); the greatest improvement occurred among women (from 7 to 36%, P = 0.06) and diabetic patients (from 21 to 50%, P = 0.055). In contrast, the initial adequacy rate of upper arm fistulas was not improved by preoperative vascular mapping (59 vs. 56%, P = 0.75). Primary access failure was higher for fistulas than grafts (46.4 vs. 20.6%, P = 0.001), but the subsequent long-term failure rate was higher for grafts than fistulas (P < 0.05). Moreover, grafts required a threefold higher intervention rate (1.67 vs. 0.57 per year, P < 0.001) to maintain their patency. The overall effect of this strategy was to double the proportion of patients dialyzing with a fistula in our population from 16 to 34% (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Routine preoperative vascular mapping results in a marked increase in placement of AV fistulas, as well as an improvement in the adequacy of forearm fistulas for dialysis. This approach resulted in a substantial increase in the proportion of patients dialyzing with a fistula in our patient population. Fistulas have a higher primary failure rate than grafts, but have a lower subsequent failure rate and require fewer procedures to maintain their long-term patency.

Tolerance in renal transplantation after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation-6-year follow-up.

Despite significant advancements in clinical transplantation, very few reports describe the long-term acceptance of transplanted solid organs without indefinite immunosuppression. The immunosuppressive agents used are nonspecific and have serious potential side effects. We present a patient who received a living-donor renal allograft from the same person who had donated bone marrow to her several years earlier. Tolerance was expected based on previous acceptance of full-thickness skin grafts from the donor. Indeed, there has been no evidence of rejection during a 6-year follow-up period, and no induction or maintenance immunosuppression has been given. All noninvasive parameters of graft function remain normal. This and similar reports prove that genetically disparate solid organs can coexist without pharmacological immunosuppression.

Risk and benefit of coronary revascularization in renal transplant candidates.

The field of transplantation along with all of medicine has made tremendous progress in the past 30 years. Patients with end-stage renal disease are managed more effectively despite increasing chronic multisystemic comorbidities, particularly involving their cardiovascular system. These same patients are also undergoing renal transplant surgery with better short- and long-term results than any era previous. We will present some of the changing demographics encountered in today's renal transplant candidates along with the processes our institution is undertaking to optimize the patient's success with the renal allograft, particularly with respect to the diagnosis and therapeutics used to manage coronary artery disease.

Review of select transplant subpopulations at high risk of failure from standard immunosuppressive therapy.

Despite improvements in short-term graft and patient survival rates for solid organ transplants, certain subgroups of transplant recipients experience poorer clinical outcome compared to the general population. Groups including pediatrics, African-Americans, diabetics, cystic fibrosis patients, and pregnant women require special considerations when designing immunosuppressive regimens that optimize transplant outcomes. Problems specific to pediatric transplant recipients include altered pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive drugs, such as cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus (poor absorption, increased metabolism, rapid clearance), the need to restore growth post-transplantation, and a high incidence of drug-related adverse effects. African-Americans have decreased drug absorption and bioavailability, high immunologic responsiveness, and a high incidence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus. Diabetics and cystic fibrosis patients exhibit poor absorption of immunosuppressive agents, which may lead to underimmunosuppression and subsequent graft rejection. Pregnant women undergo physiologic changes that can alter the pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressives, thus requiring careful clinical management to minimize the risks of either under- or overimmunosuppression to mother and child. To achieve an optimal post-transplant outcome in these high-risk patients, the problems specific to each group must be addressed, and immunosuppressive therapy individualized accordingly. Drug formulation greatly impacts upon pharmacokinetics and the resultant level of immunosuppression. Thus, a formulation with improved absorption (e.g., CsA for microemulsion), higher bioavailability, and less pharmacokinetic variability may facilitate patient management and lead to more favorable outcomes, especially in groups demonstrating low and variable bioavailability. Other strategies aimed at improving transplant outcome include the use of higher immunosuppressive doses, different combinations of immunosuppressive agents, more frequent monitoring, and management of concurrent disease states.

US vascular mapping before hemodialysis access placement.

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess the effect of preoperative ultrasonographic (US) mapping on surgical selection, placement of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and grafts, and negative surgical exploration rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: US assessment of the upper extremity arterial and venous anatomy was performed in 70 patients with chronic renal failure before surgical evaluation. The surgeon documented the planned access procedure, which was based on physical examination results, and then reviewed the US preoperative mapping report. The surgical procedure and outcome were recorded. RESULTS: Fifty-two of the 70 patients who underwent mapping had vascular access placement. Preoperative US mapping resulted in a change in the planned surgical procedure in 16 (31%) of the 52 patients. An AVF rather than the planned graft was placed in eight (15%) patients. The AVF placement rate increased from 32% (126 of 395 patients) to 58% (30 of 52 patients). Unsuccessful surgical explorations decreased from 11% (28 of 256) to 0%. CONCLUSION: Preoperative US mapping before hemodialysis access placement can result in a change in surgical management, with an increased number of AVFs placed and an improved likelihood of selecting the most functional vessels preoperatively. Further study is needed to determine longer term outcomes.

Natural history of arteriovenous grafts in hemodialysis patients.

Most hemodialysis patients in the United States have an arteriovenous graft as their vascular access. Grafts have a relatively short life span and are prone to recurrent stenosis and thrombosis, requiring multiple salvage procedures to maintain their patency. There is little information in the literature regarding the clinical factors that determine graft survival and complications. We evaluated prospectively the outcomes of 256 grafts placed at a single institution during a 2-year period. A salvage procedure to maintain graft patency (thrombectomy, angioplasty, or surgical revision) was required in 29% of the grafts at 3 months, 52% at 6 months, 77% at 12 months, and 96% at 24 months. Thus, primary graft survival (time from graft placement to the first intervention) was only 23% at 1 year and 4% at 2 years. Primary graft survival was significantly less among patients with hypoalbuminemia compared with patients with a normal serum albumin level (P = 0.003). Secondary graft survival (time from graft placement to permanent graft failure) was 65% at 1 year and 51% at 2 years. Neither primary nor secondary graft survival was significantly correlated with patient age, sex, diabetic status, body mass index, or graft site. A mean of 1.22 interventions per graft-year were required to maintain access patency, including 0.51 thrombectomies, 0.54 angioplasties, and 0.17 surgical revisions. In conclusion, hypoalbuminemia is a strong predictor of the requirement for an early graft intervention. Patients with hypoalbuminemia may require a heightened index of suspicion in monitoring their grafts for evidence of stenosis.

Specificity of preformed alloantibodies causing B cell positive flow crossmatch in renal transplantation.

The specificity of alloantibodies (alloAb) and their clinical significance in association with T-/B+ flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) in kidney transplantation are not clearly defined. This study was undertaken to examine the HLA specificity and clinical relevance of Ab causing B+ FCXM in pre-transplant (final XM) recipients' serum samples. Final FCXM serum samples were analyzed from 457 renal transplant patients followed for 10 months post-transplantation. Two hundred and sixty patients had T-/B+ final FCXM. The control group included 197 recipients with T-/B- FCXM at time of transplantation. Class I/class II PRA and specificity of anti-HLA class I and class II Ab in final FCXM serum samples were analyzed by FlowPRA Class I Screening Test and FlowPRA Class II Screening Test. We found no correlation between graft outcome and pre-transplant T-/B- and T-/B+ FCXM status. Additionally, we observed no clinical relevance of B+ FCXM in retransplant patients. However, MCS > or =200 in B+ FCXM retransplant recipients was associated with anti-class II Ab to previous mismatches in regrafted patients (n = 46). This finding was confirmed by specificity analysis of anti-DR/DQ Ab in patients with high ( > or =15%) class II PRA. In 63% (12 of 19) of retransplants having T-/B+ FCXM, we defined the specificity of alloAb to first graft mismatched class II antigens. In contrast, anti-class II Ab was detected in only 5.7% (2 of 35) of single-graft recipients with different PRA values. Significantly greater MCS (240 +/- 61 vs. 163 +/- 48; p = 0.022) was observed in retransplant patients having short ( < or =5 m) previous graft survival time (PGST) than in those with long PGST ( > or =5 m). Only 2% of retransplant recipients with B + FCXM had non-HLA Ab. In contrast, the overwhelming majority of primary recipients had no detectable alloAbs. No significant difference in class I PRA was found between B- and B+ FCXM recipients. However, class II PRA was significantly higher in patients having B + FCXM (p = 0.028). Collectively, these data show that MCS intensity is not always a reliable criterion for anti-HLA Ab detection because of the presence of non-HLA Ab. These results can be explained by low titers of anti-class II Ab, at which concentration these Ab cannot produce a deleterious effect. FlowPRA and Flow screen beads appeared to be reliable and sensitive methods for detection and specificity analysis of anti-class II alloAb.

Improved outcomes in cadaveric renal allografts with pulsatile preservation.

BACKGROUND: Early immunologic and non-immunologic injury of renal allografts adversely affects long-term graft survival. Some degree of preservation injury is inevitable in cadaveric renal transplantation, and, with the reduction in early acute rejection, this non-immunologic injury has assumed a greater relative importance. Optimal graft preservation will maximize the chances of early graft function and long-term graft survival, but the best method of preservation pulsatile perfusion (PP) versus cold storage (CS) is debated. METHODS: Primary cadaveric kidney recipients from January 1990 through December 1995 were evaluated. The effects of implantation warm ischemic time (WIT) ( < or = 20 min, 21-40 min, or > 40 min) and total ischemic time (TIT) ( < or > or = 20 h) on death-censored graft survival were compared between kidneys preserved by PP versus those preserved by CS. The effect of preservation method on delayed graft function (DGF) was also examined. RESULTS: There were 568 PP kidneys and 268 CS kidneys. Overall death-censored graft survival was not significantly different between groups, despite worse donor and recipient characteristics in the PP group. CS kidneys with an implantation WIT > 40 min had worse graft survival than those with < 40 min (p = 0.0004). Survival of PP kidneys and those transplanted into 2 DR-matched recipients was not affected by longer implantation WIT. Longer TIT did not impact survival. DGF was more likely after CS preservation (20.2% versus 8.8%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Preservation with PP improves early graft function and lessens the adverse effect of increased warm ischemia in cadaveric renal transplantation. This method is likely associated with less preservation injury and/or increases the threshold for injury from other sources and is superior to CS.

Postransplant lymphoproliferative disorder localized near the allograft in renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), a complication of immunosuppression, develops in approximately 1% of renal allograft recipients. Typically, PTLD is a proliferation of B-cells associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection; it is said to be most often a systemic disease. Involvement occasionally is localized near the allograft. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of all cases of PTLD in recipients of 1474 renal transplants performed at University of Alabama at Birmingham between 1993 and 1997. RESULTS: Of 14 patients developing PTLD, 10 had disease localized near the allograft. The mean interval from transplantation to diagnosis was 221 +/- 70 days. All patients presented with renal dysfunction; an ultrasound examination revealed a hilar mass, with hydronephrosis in five and stenosis of renal vessels in eight. No patient had lymphadenopathy, according to computerized tomographic or magnetic resonance imaging findings. After reduction of immunosuppressive therapy, seven required a nephrectomy because of rejection, progressive dysfunction, or mass enlargement. Tissue recovered in four patients was consistent with PTLD; the tumors in the remaining three patients were unresectable and regressed. One patient died 1 month after a nephrectomy, and another died 4 years after surgery; neither had evidence of PTLD when they died. Three patients retain functional grafts without clinical or radiographical evidence of progression. All patients with disseminated disease died. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of renal allograft recipients, PTLD affected 1%. Disease localized near the allograft was the most common variant. For most patients with localized disease, the outcome was graft loss, and the mortality was low. Localized PTLD should be considered in the differential diagnosis of allograft dysfunction in the 1st posttransplant year.

Predictors of adequacy of arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Dialysis access procedures and complications represent a major cause of morbidity, hospitalization, and cost for chronic dialysis patients. To improve the outcomes of hemodialysis access procedures, recent clinical guidelines have encouraged attempts to place an arteriovenous (A-V) fistula, rather than an A-V graft, whenever possible in hemodialysis patients. There is little information, however, about the success rate of following such an aggressive strategy in the prevalent dialysis population. METHODS: We evaluated the adequacy of all A-V fistulas placed in University of Alabama at Birmingham dialysis patients during a two-year period. A fistula was considered adequate if it supported a blood flow of >/=350 ml/min on at least six dialysis sessions in one month. Fistula adequacy was correlated with clinical and demographic factors. RESULTS: The adequacy could be determined for 101 fistulas; only 47 fistulas (46.5%) developed sufficiently to be used for dialysis. The adequacy rate was lower in older (age >/= 65) versus younger (age < 65) patients (30.0 vs. 53.5%, P = 0.03). It was also marginally lower in diabetics versus nondiabetics (35.0 vs. 54.1%, P = 0.061) and in overweight (BMI >/= 27 kg/m2) versus nonoverweight patients (34.5 vs. 55.2%, P = 0.07). The adequacy rate was not affected by patient race, smoking status, surgeon, serum albumin, or serum parathyroid hormone. The adequacy rate was substantially lower for forearm versus upper arm fistulas (34.0 vs. 58.9%, P = 0.012). The adequacy of forearm fistulas was particularly poor in women (7%), patients age 65 or older (12%), and diabetics (21%). In contrast, upper arm fistulas were adequate in 56% of women, 54% of older patients, and 48% of diabetics. CONCLUSIONS: An aggressive approach to the placement of fistulas in dialysis patients results in a less than 50% early adequacy rate, which is considerably lower than that reported in the past. Moreover, the success rate of fistulas is even lower for certain patient subsets. To achieve an optimal outcome with A-V fistulas, we recommend that they be constructed preferentially in the upper arm in female, diabetic, and older hemodialysis patients.

A multidisciplinary approach to hemodialysis access: prospective evaluation.

Dialysis access procedures and complications represent a major cause of morbidity, hospitalization and cost for chronic dialysis patients. To improve outcomes and reduce the cost of hemodialysis access procedures we developed a multidisciplinary approach, involving nephrologists, access surgeons, and radiologists. A full-time dialysis access coordinator scheduled all access procedures with the surgeons and radiologists, and tracked outcomes. A computerized database was developed for prospective documentation of procedures and complications. Confidential, detailed analyses and recommendations for improvements were provided periodically to the surgeons and radiologists. The major changes arising from the multidisciplinary approach were as follows: (1) The approach to clotted grafts evolved from an inpatient surgical procedure to an outpatient radiologic procedure. The immediate technical success rate of graft declots increased from 48% to 69%. (2) Elective placement of arteriovenous (A-V) grafts evolved from a three-day inpatient hospitalization to a largely outpatient procedure. The proportion of A-V grafts placed as same day surgery or outpatient surgery increased from 16% to 81%. (3) Surgical complications of new A-V graft surgery decreased from 25% to 11%. (4) Aggressive detection and correction of graft stenosis decreased the incidence of graft thrombosis by 60%, from 0.70 to 0.28 events per patient-year. (5) The proportion of native A-V fistula construction in new dialysis patients increased from 33% to 69%. In conclusion, an integrated multidisciplinary approach markedly reduced surgical complications of access surgery and decreased access failures. These improvements occurred despite a marked decrease in hospitalization for access procedures, with a substantial cost saving.

Renal retransplantation at the University of Alabama at Birmingham: incidence and outcome.

Only half the patients who lost a renal allograft either returned to the waiting list (32%) or were retransplanted (17%). One fifth died soon after allograft loss. Patients did not return to the waiting list for multiple reasons including patient choice, worsened medical condition and most commonly, interest but non-referral. Diabetics had a significantly diminished chance for survival on dialysis after graft loss. African-Americans had a better chance of survival after graft loss but a much worse opportunity to be retransplanted. The use of CellCept in triple immunosuppressive therapy, along with a flow cytometry crossmatch, has improved retransplant allograft survival commensurate with primary graft outcome. The incidence of retransplantation is decreasing at our institution even though the number of potential candidates for retransplantation remains stable.

A comparison of tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine for immunosuppression after cadaveric renal transplantation. FK506 Kidney Transplant Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus (FK506), a macrolide molecule that potently inhibits the expression of interleukin 2 by T lymphocytes, represents a potential major advance in the management of rejection following solid-organ transplantation. This randomized, open-label study compared the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus-based versus cyclosporine-based immunosuppression in patients receiving cadaveric kidney transplants. METHODS: A total of 412 patients were randomized to tacrolimus (n=205) or cyclosporine (n=207) after cadaveric renal transplantation and were followed for 1 year for patient and graft survival and the incidence of acute rejection. RESULTS: One-year patient survival rates were 95.6% for tacrolimus and 96.6% for cyclosporine (P=0.576). Corresponding 1-year graft survival rates were 91.2% and 87.9% (P=0.289). There was a significant reduction in the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection in the tacrolimus group (30.7%) compared with the cyclosporine group (46.4%, P=0.001), which was confirmed by blinded review, and in the use of antilymphocyte therapy for rejection (10.7% and 25.1%, respectively; P<0.001). Impaired renal function, gastrointestinal disorders, and neurological complications were commonly reported in both treatment groups, but tremor and paresthesia were more frequent in the tacrolimus group. The incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus was 19.9% in the tacrolimus group and 4.0% in the cyclosporine group (P<0.001), and was reversible in some patients. CONCLUSIONS: Tacrolimus is more effective than cyclosporine in preventing acute rejection in cadaveric renal allograft recipients, and significantly reduces the use of antilymphocyte antibody preparations. Tacrolimus was associated with a higher incidence of neurologic events, which were rarely treatment limiting, and with posttransplant diabetes mellitus, which was reversible in some patients.

Benefits of continued cyclosporine through an indigent drug program.

Financial circumstances force some stable renal transplant recipients to discontinue cyclosporine (CsA). Previous results from our center document a subgroup of these patients at increased risk for acute rejection and allograft loss, namely, those of African ancestry. After 1988, such disadvantaged recipients have been able to receive CsA at no charge through the National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD). At the University of Alabama at Birmingham, 54 patients were enrolled in the NORD program between 1988 and 1994. Acute rejection, allograft survival, and patient survival in these patients were compared with those in 42 patients who, prior to 1988, were withdrawn from CsA for financial reasons. Both groups were similar socioeconomically. The mean follow-up was 69 +/- 33 months (+/-SD) in the withdrawal group and 45 +/- 14 months in those entering the NORD program. Acute rejections occurred with similar frequency in both groups before CsA withdrawal (45%) or NORD enrollment (48%). In contrast, acute rejections were more common in patients after the onset of CsA withdrawal (38%) than after NORD enrollment (11%) (P < 0.01). Black patients withdrawn from CsA experienced more acute rejections than their counterparts in the NORD program (57% v 15%) (P < 0.01). White NORD recipients also experienced fewer acute rejections, although the difference was not statistically significant (withdrawal group 16% v NORD group 4%; P = 0.29). Rejection episodes were accompanied by reduced graft survival in black patients withdrawn from CsA, while significant improvement was seen in those remaining on CsA-based therapy (P < 0.05). No difference in allograft survival was seen among white patients in either group (withdrawal group 74% v NORD group 82%; P = 0.33). Thus, long-term access to CsA through the NORD program reduced acute rejections and improved allograft survival in an economically disadvantaged subgroup of renal transplant recipients. These findings emphasize the importance of continued access to CsA in black renal transplant recipients and its influence on long-term allograft survival.

A multicenter trial of FK506 (tacrolimus) therapy in refractory acute renal allograft rejection. A report of the Tacrolimus Kidney Transplantation Rescue Study Group.

A multicenter trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in the treatment of refractory renal allograft rejection. Renal transplant recipients experiencing biopsy-proven recurrent acute allograft rejection were eligible if the current rejection episode was refractory to corticosteroids. A total of 73 patients were enrolled, of whom 59 (81%) had previously received at least one course of antilymphocyte antibody as rejection therapy. One-year follow-up was available in 93% of patients. Median time to tacrolimus rescue therapy was 75 days after transplantation (range, 18-1448 days). Therapeutic responses to tacrolimus included improvement in 78% of patients, stabilization in 11%, and progressive deterioration in 11%. The risk of experiencing progressive deterioration was related to the pretacrolimus serum creatinine level: serum creatinine < or = mg/dl, 3%; 3.1-5 mg/dl, 16% (P < 0.04); > 5 mg/dl, 23% (P < 0.02). Twelve-month (from the time of initiation of tacrolimus therapy) actuarial patient and graft survival rates were 93% and 75%. Graft loss occurred in 19 patients (25%) at a median time of 108 days. Fourteen episodes of recurrent rejection were diagnosed in 10 patients (14%), at a median time of 101 days. Eleven episodes of recurrent rejection were treated (three patients underwent transplant nephrectomy), with resolution achieved in nine patients. Antilymphocyte antibody therapy was not used to treat recurrent rejection. Serum creatinine values improved during tacrolimus therapy: median serum creatinine level before tacrolimus, 3.2 mg/dl; median at 1 year after tacrolimus, 1.8 mg/dl. Twelve infections were documented in 11 patients (15%), including cytomegalovirus infection in three patients (4%). Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder was diagnosed in a single patient. Tacrolimus whole blood levels averaged 15.0 +/- 9.9 ng/ml at day 7 of tacrolimus therapy and 9.4 +/- 5.1 ng/ml at 1 year, and were consistent among individual centers. Treatment outcome did not correlate with tacrolimus blood levels. The most commonly observed adverse events were neurological and gastrointestinal. Seventy-four percent of patients received tacrolimus for at least 1 year. Tacrolimus therapy was discontinued in 18% of patients for rejection (11% for progressive, unrelenting rejection, and 7% for recurrent rejection). Tacrolimus therapy was discontinued in 8% of patients due to adverse events. In conclusion, tacrolimus rescue therapy provides (1) prompt, effective reversal of refractory renal allograft rejection, (2) good long-term renal allograft function, (3) a low incidence of recurrent rejection, and (4) an acceptable safety profile in renal allograft recipients experiencing refractory rejection.

Impact of donor/recipient size matching on outcomes in renal transplantation.

Interest in nonimmunologic factors affecting longterm graft survival has focused on adequacy of nephron dosing. Body surface are (BSA) is a reliable surrogate for nephron mass. In a retrospective study of 378 primary recipients of paired kidneys from 189 cadaveric donors, we assessed the impact of matching donor and recipient BSA on outcome over 7 years. BSA of donors was 1.82 +/- 0.26 m2. Initially, paired recipients of kidneys from a single donor were divided into two groups. Group 1 included the recipient with the larger BSA of the pair (1.97 +/- 0.17 m2), while group 2 consisted of smaller BSA recipients (1.69 +/- 0.19 m2). Although early function was better in group 2 patients, graft survival at 1 year (77% vs. 79%) and 5 years (54% vs. 55%) was identical between groups, as were most recent serum creatinine levels (2.0 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.1 +/- 0.1 mg/dl). A second analysis divided patients with a functioning allograft at discharge from initial transplant hospitalization (n = 345) into three groups based solely on donor to recipient BSA ratio: the ratio of group A (n = 30) was < or = 0.8, that of group B (n = 255) was between 0.81 and 1.19, and that of group C (n = 51) was > or = 1.2. Graft survival and kidney function over 5 years did not differ among groups. In multivariate analysis of 17 variables, donor:recipient BSA, independent of other risk factors, did not affect risk allograft loss. These data indicate that including nephron mass as a criterion for cadaveric organ allocation is unlikely to improve long-term results in renal transplantation.