Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Affect Disord ; 71(1-3): 221-7, 2002 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12167521

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The reliability of telephone interviews for rating 25 selected individual items of the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS) was assessed among persons with remitted bipolar disorder I (BPD I, n = 20). METHODS: The Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS) was administered directly (with two raters present) and by telephone in random order to 20 adults with bipolar disorder I. RESULTS: Telephone interviews achieved reliability comparable to direct interviews for 16 items (64%), but were considered unsatisfactory for seven others (28%). Two other items, which evaluated the overlap between substance abuse and mood disorder, were considered unreliable for both methods of interview. LIMITATIONS: The presence of two interviewers for the in-person interview may have led to over-estimation of in-person reliability. Investigator bias in favor of phone interviews and a relatively small sample may have confounded the results. CONCLUSIONS: Telephone interviews may be used to evaluate individuals with BPD I in remission, provided the limitations of this method are recognized. They have limited reliability for dissecting overlap between mood abnormalities and psychotic phenomena or substance abuse.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/standards , Telephone , Adolescent , Adult , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mood Disorders/complications , Mood Disorders/psychology , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , Substance-Related Disorders/complications
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...