Risk Factors for Adverse Outcomes in Term Infants with CHD and Definitive Necrotising Enterocolitis.

OBJECTIVES: To define the incidence of definitive necrotising enterocolitis in term infants with CHD and identify risk factors for morbidity/mortality. METHODS: We performed a 20-year (2000-2020) single-institution retrospective cohort study of term infants with CHD admitted to the Boston Children's Hospital cardiac ICU with necrotising enterocolitis (Bell's stage ≥ II). The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality and post-necrotising enterocolitis morbidity (need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, multisystem organ failure based on the paediatric sequential organ failure assessment score, and/or need for acute gastrointestinal intervention). Predictors included patient characteristics, cardiac diagnosis/interventions, feeding regimen, and severity measures. RESULTS: Of 3933 term infants with CHD, 2.1% (n = 82) developed necrotising enterocolitis, with 67% diagnosed post-cardiac intervention. Thirty (37%) met criteria for the primary outcome. In-hospital mortality occurred in 14 infants (17%), of which nine (11%) deaths were attributable to necrotising enterocolitis. Independent predictors of the primary outcome included moderate to severe systolic ventricular dysfunction (odds ratio 13.4,confidence intervals 1.13-159) and central line infections pre-necrotising enterocolitis diagnosis (odds ratio 17.7, confidence intervals 3.21-97.0) and mechanical ventilation post-necrotising enterocolitis diagnosis (odds ratio 13.5, confidence intervals 3.34-54.4). Single ventricle, ductal dependency, and feeding related factors were not independently associated with the primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of necrotising enterocolitis was 2.1% in term infants with CHD. Adverse outcomes occurred in greater than 30% of patients. Presence of systolic dysfunction and central line infections prior to diagnosis and need for mechanical ventilation after diagnosis of necrotising enterocolitis can inform risk triage and prognostic counseling for families.

Electrocardiograms Do Not Detect Myocardial Ischemia in Patients With Williams Syndrome and Nonsyndromic Elastin Arteriopathy With Coronary Artery Stenosis.

Coronary artery stenosis (CAS) may affect up to 27% of patients with Williams syndrome (WS), which may lead to myocardial ischemia. Patients with WS face a 25- to 100-fold greater risk of sudden cardiac death, frequently linked to anesthesia. Assessing CAS requires either imaging while under general anesthesia or intraoperative assessment, with the latter considered the gold standard. Our study aimed to identify electrocardiogram (ECG) markers of myocardial ischemia in patients with WS or nonsyndromic elastin arteriopathy and documented CAS. We retrospectively reviewed patients with WS/elastin arteriopathy who underwent supravalvar aortic stenosis surgery and CAS assessment from January 1, 2006 to April 30, 2021. A pediatric electrophysiologist, not aware of the patients' CAS status, reviewed their preoperative ECGs for markers of ischemia. We assessed associations of study parameters using Wilcoxon rank-sum and Fisher's exact tests. Of 34 patients, 62% were male, with a median age of 20 months (interquartile range: 8 to 34). CAS was present in 62% (21 of 34), 76% of whom (16 of 21) were male. There were no ECG indicators of myocardial ischemia in patients with CAS. In conclusion, CAS was present in >1/2 the children with WS/elastin arteriopathy who underwent repair of supravalvar aortic stenosis. CAS in WS/nonsyndromic elastin arteriopathy does not appear to exhibit typical ECG-detectable myocardial ischemia. ECGs are not a useful screening tool for CAS in WS/elastin arteriopathy. Given the high anesthesia-related cardiac arrest risk, other noninvasive indicators of CAS are needed.

Arrhythmias in Williams Syndrome.

Williams syndrome (WS) is a congenital, multisystem disorder in which 80% of patients have cardiovascular abnormalities. Sudden cardiac death occurs 25 to 100 times more often in WS than in the general population, and cardiac repolarization is abnormal in WS. We sought to determine the prevalence of primary arrhythmias in patients with WS and whether QTc prolongation impacts arrhythmia risk. We retrospectively reviewed all patients with WS with ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring at our institution between October 2017 and January 2022. The primary outcome was the presence of arrhythmia. Predictors pre-determined for analysis included premature ventricular and atrial complex burden (%), degree of QTc change with varying heart rates, intervals and rhythm on 12-lead ECG, age, gender, symptomatology, and clinical and surgical history. A total of 74 patients (55% female, median age 8 years (3, 13) underwent 108 ambulatory monitors. Arrhythmias were present in 9 patients (12%). Within this group of 9 patients, 18/24 serial monitors were abnormal, and 3/9 patients (33%) had >1 arrhythmia type. Older age (p = 0.002) and symptoms (syncope, p = 0.005) were associated with arrhythmias. Arrhythmia was not associated with the degree of structural heart disease. Atrial tachycardia was the most identified arrhythmia (n = 6; 67% of patients with arrhythmias and 8% of the total cohort). The QTc abnormally increased with higher heart rates in all groups. There was a higher number of premature ventricular and atrial complexes per hour in patients with arrhythmias. In conclusion, atrial arrhythmias were the most common arrhythmia in patients with WS and routine ambulatory ECG and intermittent rhythm monitoring are indicated in WS, particularly given the high risk of sudden cardiac death in WS.

Importance of Formula-Specific Centile Thresholds for Evaluation of Heart Rate-Corrected QT Prolongation in Williams Syndrome.

Patients with Williams syndrome (WS) have a 25- to 100-fold higher risk of sudden death and prolonged heart rate-corrected QT (QTc). A recent study using the Fridericia formula for QT correction suggested that prolongation is principally an issue of heart rate. We used multiple published heart rate correction formulas to reevaluate the prevalence of QTc prolongation in our original dataset from our 2010 study at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. The ninety-eighth centile for QTc and corrected JT Interval (JTc) of the control population for each formula were used to set the threshold for prolongation. Prevalence comparison was done with Fisher's exact test. Predictors of longer QTc/JTc were assessed using linear regression models adjusting for age, gender, and heart rate. Adjusted odds of QTc/JTc prolongation were evaluated with conditional logistic regression models matched based on age and heart rate. There were 482 electrocardiograms from 188 patients with WS and 1,522 from normal controls. Patients with WS were younger, with higher heart rates and shorter RR and QRS intervals. WS was associated with longer QTc/JTc compared with controls. There were higher odds of prolonged QTc/JTc in patients with WS than controls using both Bazett and Fridericia formulas. In conclusion, this study confirms the higher prevalence of QTc prolongation in WS compared with controls and highlights the importance of setting appropriate formula-specific upper thresholds for QTc prolongation for accurate diagnosis.