ABSTRACT
This study compared the outcome of total knee replacement (TKR) in adult patients with fixed- and mobile-bearing prostheses during the first post-operative year and at five years' follow-up, using gait parameters as a new objective measure. This double-blind randomised controlled clinical trial included 55 patients with mobile-bearing (n = 26) and fixed-bearing (n = 29) prostheses of the same design, evaluated pre-operatively and post-operatively at six weeks, three months, six months, one year and five years. Each participant undertook two walking trials of 30 m and completed the EuroQol questionnaire, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index, Knee Society score, and visual analogue scales for pain and stiffness. Gait analysis was performed using five miniature angular rate sensors mounted on the trunk (sacrum), each thigh and calf. The study population was divided into two groups according to age (≤ 70 years versus > 70 years). Improvements in most gait parameters at five years' follow-up were greater for fixed-bearing TKRs in older patients (> 70 years), and greater for mobile-bearing TKRs in younger patients (≤ 70 years). These findings should be confirmed by an extended age controlled study, as the ideal choice of prosthesis might depend on the age of the patient at the time of surgery.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/instrumentation , Gait , Knee Prosthesis , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Age Factors , Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/rehabilitation , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/rehabilitation , Pain Measurement/methods , Prosthesis Design , Quality of Life , Range of Motion, Articular , Recovery of Function , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of patients with total hip replacement. DESIGN: Prospective preliminary trial comparing the Western Ontario and McMaster University questionnaire (WOMAC) and gait analysis preoperatively and three months postoperatively. SETTING: A German academic orthopaedic centre specializing in total hip replacement surgery. SUBJECTS: Seventeen patients (median age 70 years) with hip osteoarthritis. INTERVENTION: All patients had had a primary unilateral total hip replacement. MAIN MEASURES: WOMAC questionnaire to assess self-perceived health status and gait analysis to determine objective gait parameters. RESULTS: Performance of walking as well as subjective judgement of health status improved following surgery (gait speed P = 0.0222; stride length P = 0.038; stance phase ratio P = 0.0466; WOMAC P < 0.0001). However, the correlation between gait parameters and WOMAC was poor (r = -0.27 or less). Correlation between changes of walking parameters and WOMAC was bad to good (r = 0.01 to r = -0.72). CONCLUSION: The WOMAC questionnaire might not reflect walking performance. The addition of gait analysis is recommended to gain objective information about the quality of gait.
Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/rehabilitation , Gait/physiology , Recovery of Function/physiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Status , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Self-Assessment , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Spatial and temporal parameters of gait have clinical relevance in the assessment of motor pathologies, particularly in orthopaedics. A new gait analysis system is proposed which consists of (a) an ambulatory device (Physilog) including a set of miniature gyroscopes and a portable datalogger, and (b) an algorithm for gait analysis. The aim of this study was the validation of this system, for accuracy and clinical applicability. Eleven patients with coxarthrosis, eight patients with total hip arthroplasty and nine control subjects were studied using this portable system and also a reference motion analyzer and force plate. The small differences in the stance period (19 +/- ms), stride length and velocity (0.4 +/- 9.6 cm and 2.5 +/- 8.3 cm/s, respectively), as well as thigh and shank rotations (2.4 +/- 4.3 degrees and 0.3 +/- 3.3 degrees, respectively), confirmed good agreement of the proposed system with the reference system. In addition, nearly the same accuracy was obtained for all three groups. Gait analysis based on Physilog was also in agreement with their Harris Hip Scores (HHS): the subjects with lower scores had a greater limp, a slower walking speed and a shorter stride. This ambulatory gait analysis system provides an easy, reproducible and objective method of quantifying changes in gait after joint replacement surgery for coxarthrosis.
