Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 55(8): 322-31, 1994 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8071299

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study examined the nature of impairment of functioning in persons with social phobia and assessed the validity of two new rating scales for describing impairment in social phobia. METHOD: In 32 patients with social phobia and 14 normal control subjects, impairment was assessed using the Disability Profile and the Liebowitz Self-Rated Disability Scale, new instruments designed to provide clinician- and patient-rated descriptive measures of current and lifetime functional impairment related to emotional problems. Validity of the new scales was assessed by measuring internal consistency, comparing scores for patients and controls, and comparing scores with those on standard measures of disability, social phobia symptoms, and social support. RESULTS: More than half of all social phobic patients reported at least moderate impairment at some time in their lives, due to social anxiety and avoidance, in areas of education, employment, family relationships, marriage/romantic relationships, friendships/social network, and other interests. Social phobic patients were rated more impaired than normal controls on nearly all items on both measures. Both scales were internally consistent, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients for lifetime and current disability subscales in the range of .87 to .92. Significant positive correlations of scores on the new scales with scores on coadministered standard scales of social phobia symptoms and disability demonstrated concurrent validity. Disability was not significantly correlated with measures of social support. CONCLUSION: Social phobia is associated with impairment in most areas of functioning, and the new scales appear useful in assessing functional impairment related to social phobia.


Subject(s)
Phobic Disorders/diagnosis , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Activities of Daily Living , Adult , Disability Evaluation , Family , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Personality Inventory , Phobic Disorders/classification , Phobic Disorders/psychology , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index , Social Adjustment
2.
Psychiatr Clin North Am ; 15(1): 87-107, 1992 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1549550

ABSTRACT

Recent evidence now suggests that OCD is much more common in young people than previously thought, affecting up to 200,000 children and adolescents in the United States alone. Unlike many childhood disorders, OCD appears remarkably similar for children and adults in terms of both clinical presentations and treatment response. The treatments of choice for OCD are antidepressants with potent serotonergic reuptake blocking effects such as fluoxetine and clomipramine. Both medications appear to be equally effective in terms of symptom remission, with different investigators reporting response rates in the range of 50% to 75%. Recent evidence suggests, however, that fluoxetine may be tolerated more easily than clomipramine and may be associated with less relapse upon discontinuation. Behavior therapy, either alone or in combination with medication, has been shown to be an effective alternative treatment. In spite of the increasing recognition of the disorder in both adults and children, only a handful of treatment outcome studies of child and adolescent OCD have been conducted and much work remains to be done in this area.


Subject(s)
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder/drug therapy , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Serotonin Antagonists/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...