CD4+:CD8+ T-cell ratio changes in people with HIV receiving antiretroviral treatment.

BACKGROUND: Cofactors associated with persistently abnormal CD4+:CD8+ T-cell ratio in people with HIV (PWH) on antiretroviral treatment (ART) might change over time as the population of people with HIV ages or as new ART drugs become available. The main objective of our study was to determine the long-term associations of baseline factors, including the CD4+ T-cell count and ratio, with ratio normalization (≥1). In addition to this, we explored whether the ratio remained associated with the risk of both AIDS and non-AIDS events among individuals on suppressive ART. METHODS: Clinic-based study in a tertiary, university hospital in Madrid. People with HIV starting a first-line ART regimen (January 2006-June 2017) were included in a prospective national multicentre cohort (CoRIS). People with controlled HIV-infection within the first year of ART initiation and complete CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell records were selected. Cox proportional hazard (PH) regression models were used to estimate the cumulative incidence of ratio normalization and to examine associations with socio-demographic and clinical variables. To investigate factors independently associated with the development of AIDS and non-AIDS events we used a time updated Poisson regression model. RESULTS: The study included 557 subjects. During follow-up (median 5.24 years), 44% of participants achieved a ratio of 1 within a median of 1.49 years. In a multivariate PH model, pre-ART factors negatively associated with ratio normalization were the pre-ART CD4+:CD8+ T-cell ratio and mode of HIV acquisition. For the secondary analysis, 1.3 events/100 person years of follow-up were observed. After adjustment, older age, HIV RNA >200 copies/ml and CD4+:CD8+ T-cell ratios over follow-up, remained significantly associated with the development of AIDS and non-AIDS events. In contrast, pre-ART ratio was not associated with the risk of AIDS and non-AIDS events. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, our study showed that higher pre-ART CD4+:CD8+ T-cell ratio is associated with rates of ratio normalization ≥1. In addition, the risk of AIDS and non-AIDS events seems to be predicted by the time updated CD4+:CD8+ T-cell ratio not by the pre-ART CD4+:CD8+ T-cell ratio. Therefore, CD4+:CD8+ T-cell ratio should be considered as a dynamic marker for translation into clinical practice.

Direct-acting antivirals are effective and safe in HCV/HIV-coinfected liver transplant recipients who experience recurrence of hepatitis C: A prospective nationwide cohort study.

Direct-acting antivirals have proved to be highly efficacious and safe in monoinfected liver transplant (LT) recipients who experience recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, there is a lack of data on effectiveness and tolerability of these regimens in HCV/HIV-coinfected patients who experience recurrence of HCV infection after LT. In this prospective, multicenter cohort study, the outcomes of 47 HCV/HIV-coinfected LT patients who received DAA therapy (with or without ribavirin [RBV]) were compared with those of a matched cohort of 148 HCV-monoinfected LT recipients who received similar treatment. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. HCV/HIV-coinfected patients had a median (IQR) CD4 T-cell count of 366 (256-467) cells/µL. HIV-RNA was <50 copies/mL in 96% of patients. The DAA regimens administered were SOF + LDV ± RBV (34%), SOF + SMV ± RBV (31%), SOF + DCV ± RBV (27%), SMV + DCV ± RBV (5%), and 3D (3%), with no differences between the groups. Treatment was well tolerated in both groups. Rates of SVR (negative serum HCV-RNA at 12 weeks after the end of treatment) were high and similar for coinfected and monoinfected patients (95% and 94%, respectively; P = .239). Albeit not significant, a trend toward lower SVR rates among patients with advanced fibrosis (P = .093) and genotype 4 (P = .088) was observed. In conclusion, interferon-free regimens with DAAs for post-LT recurrence of HCV infection in HIV-infected individuals were highly effective and well tolerated, with results comparable to those of HCV-monoinfected patients.

Uptake of hepatitis C virus treatment in HIV/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients across Europe in the era of direct-acting antivirals.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To investigate the uptake of hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy among HIV/HCV-coinfected patients in the pan-European EuroSIDA study between 2011 and 2016. METHODS: All HCV-RNA+ patients were included. Baseline was defined as latest of anti-HCV+, January 2011 or enrolment in EuroSIDA. The incidence of starting first interferon-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy was calculated. Factors associated with starting interferon-free DAA were determined by Poisson regression. RESULTS: Among 4308 HCV-RNA+ patients (1255, 970, 663, 633, 787 from South, West, North, Central East and East Europe, respectively) with 11 863 person-years of follow-up, 1113 (25.8%) started any HCV therapy. Among patients with at least F3 fibrosis, more than 50% in all regions remained untreated. The incidence (per 1000 person-years of follow-up, 95% confidence interval) of starting DAA increased from 7.8 (5.9-9.8) in 2014 to 135.2 (122.0-148.5) in 2015 and 128.9 (113.5-144.3) in 2016. The increase was highest in North and West and intermediate in South, but remained modest in Central East and Eastern Europe. After adjustment, women, individuals from Central East or East, genotype 3, antiretroviral therapy naïve and those with detectable HIV-RNA were less likely to start DAA. Older persons, those with HCV-RNA more than 500 000 IU/ml and those with more advanced liver fibrosis were more likely to start DAA. CONCLUSION: Uptake of DAA therapy among HIV/HCV-coinfected patients increased considerably in Western Europe between 2014 and 2016, but was modest in Central East and East. In all regions more than 50% with at least F3 fibrosis remained untreated. Women were less likely to start DAA.

Human immunodeficiency virus-infected liver transplant recipients with incidental hepatocellular carcinoma: A prospective multicenter nationwide cohort study.

There is a lack of data on incidental hepatocellular carcinoma (iHCC) in the setting of liver transplantation (LT) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. This study aims to describe the frequency, histopathological characteristics, and outcomes of HIV+ LT recipients with iHCC from a Spanish multicenter cohort in comparison with a matched cohort of LT patients without HIV infection. A total of 15 (6%) out of 271 patients with HIV infection who received LT in Spain from 2002 to 2012 and 38 (5%) out of the 811 HIV- counterparts presented iHCC in liver explants (P = 0.58). Patients with iHCC constitute the present study population. All patients also had hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis. There were no significant differences in histopathological features of iHCC between the 2 groups. Most patients showed a small number and size of tumoral nodules, and few patients had satellite nodules, microvascular invasion, or poorly differentiated tumors. After a median follow-up of 49 months, no patient developed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after LT. HIV+ LT recipients tended to have lower survival than their HIV- counterparts at 1 (73% versus 92%), 3 (67% versus 84%), and 5 years (50% versus 80%; P = 0.06). There was also a trend to a higher frequency of HCV recurrence as a cause of death in the former (33% versus 10%; P = 0.097). In conclusion, among LT recipients for HCV-related cirrhosis, the incidence and histopathological features of iHCC in HIV+ and HIV- patients were similar. However, post-LT survival was lower in HIV+ patients probably because of a more aggressive HCV recurrence. Liver Transplantation 23 645-651 2017 AASLD.

Human immunodeficiency virus infection does not worsen prognosis of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

UNLABELLED: The impact of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection on patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is uncertain. This study aimed to assess the outcome of a prospective Spanish nationwide cohort of HIV-infected patients undergoing LT for HCC (2002-2014). These patients were matched (age, gender, year of LT, center, and hepatitis C virus (HCV) or hepatitis B virus infection) with non-HIV-infected controls (1:3 ratio). Patients with incidental HCC were excluded. Seventy-four HIV-infected patients and 222 non-HIV-infected patients were included. All patients had cirrhosis, mostly due to HCV infection (92%). HIV-infected patients were younger (47 versus 51 years) and had undetectable HCV RNA at LT (19% versus 9%) more frequently than non-HIV-infected patients. No significant differences were detected between HIV-infected and non-HIV-infected recipients in the radiological characteristics of HCC at enlisting or in the histopathological findings for HCC in the explanted liver. Survival at 1, 3, and 5 years for HIV-infected versus non-HIV-infected patients was 88% versus 90%, 78% versus 78%, and 67% versus 73% (P = 0.779), respectively. HCV infection (hazard ratio = 7.90, 95% confidence interval 1.07-56.82) and maximum nodule diameter >3 cm in the explanted liver (hazard ratio = 1.72, 95% confidence interval 1.02-2.89) were independently associated with mortality in the whole series. HCC recurred in 12 HIV-infected patients (16%) and 32 non-HIV-infected patients (14%), with a probability of 4% versus 5% at 1 year, 18% versus 12% at 3 years, and 20% versus 19% at 5 years (P = 0.904). Microscopic vascular invasion (hazard ratio = 3.40, 95% confidence interval 1.34-8.64) was the only factor independently associated with HCC recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: HIV infection had no impact on recurrence of HCC or survival after LT. Our results support the indication of LT in HIV-infected patients with HCC.

Delayed liver fibrosis in HTLV-2-infected patients co-infected with HIV-1 and hepatitis C virus with suppressive antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVES: The absence of direct clinical symptoms clearly associated to HTLV-2 infection may partially explain an underestimate of the real HTLV-2 prevalence rate and its effects in patients concurrently infected with HIV-1 and hepatitis C virus (HCV). Hence, to date, the influence of HTLV-2 on hepatic fibrosis has been poorly studied. DESIGN: Retrospective study to clarify the influence of HTLV-2 infection in HCV infection and hepatic fibrosis among patients co-infected with HIV-1. METHODS: This is a comparative cohort study including 39 HTLV-2-HIV-1-HCV co-infected patients and 42 HIV-1-HCV co-infected patients conducted in a tertiary care hospital. They were evaluated for transaminase levels, hepatic fibrosis stage, interleukin (IL)-28B genotype, Th1/Th2/Th17 cytokine levels, immune activation, inflammation, and microbial translocation. RESULTS: HTLV-2-HIV-1-HCV co-infected patients had lower alanine aminotransferase levels (P = 0.023) and hepatic fibrosis (P = 0.012), compared to HIV-1-HCV co-infected patients. Moreover, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a delay in hepatic fibrosis development for up to 5 years (P = 0.032). HTLV-2-HIV-1-HCV co-infected patients also had higher Th1/Th2 ratio (interferon γ/IL-4 ratio, P = 0.043; tumor necrosis factor α/IL-4 ratio, P = 0.010) and Th17 response (P = 0.015), whereas lower CD8 T-cell activation (P = 0.017) and lipopolysaccharide level (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Findings strongly support that HTLV-2 co-infection might delay fibrosis development in HCV-HIV-1 co-infected patients.

Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in HIV-infected patients with recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin for the recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation in HCV/HIV-coinfected patients. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicentre cohort study, including 78 HCV/HIV-coinfected liver transplant patients who received treatment for recurrent hepatitis C. For comparison, we included 176 matched HCV-monoinfected patients who underwent liver transplantation during the same period of time at the same centres and were treated for recurrent hepatitis C. RESULTS: Antiviral therapy was discontinued prematurely in 56% and 39% (p = 0.016), mainly because of toxicity (22% and 11%, respectively; p=0.034). Sustained virological response (SVR) was achieved in 21% of the coinfected patients and in 36% of monoinfected patients (p = 0.013). For genotype 1, SVR rates were 10% and 33% (p = 0.002), respectively; no significant differences were observed for the other genotypes. A multivariate analysis based on the whole series identified HIV-coinfection as an independent predictor of lack of SVR (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.06-0.42). Other predictors of SVR were donor age, pretreatment HCV viral load, HCV genotype, and early virological response. SVR was associated with a significant improvement in survival: 5-year survival after antiviral treatment was 79% for HCV/HIV-coinfected patients with SVR vs. 43% for those without (p = 0.02) and 92% vs. 60% in HCV-monoinfected patients (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The response to pegylated interferon and ribavirin was poorer in HCV/HIV-coinfected liver recipients, particularly those with genotype 1. However, when SVR was achieved, survival of coinfected patients increased significantly.

Safety and anti-HCV effect of prolonged intravenous silibinin in HCV genotype 1 subjects in the immediate liver transplant period.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Reinfection of the graft is the rule in patients with HCV cirrhosis undergoing liver transplantation, and HCV-RNA reaches pre-transplantation levels within the first month. Short-term intravenous silibinin monotherapy is safe and shows a potent in vivo anti-HCV effect. We aimed at evaluating the safety and antiviral effect of prolonged intravenous silibinin, started immediately before liver transplantation. METHODS: Single centre, prospective, pilot study, to assess the safety and effect on HCV-RNA kinetics during at least 21 days of intravenous silibinin monotherapy (20 mg/kg/day) in 9 consecutive HCV genotype 1 subjects, in comparison to a control, non-treated group of 7 consecutive prior transplanted subjects under the same immunosuppressive regimen (basiliximab, steroids, delayed tacrolimus, micophenolate). RESULTS: Intravenous silibinin led to significant, maintained and progressive HCV-RNA decreases (mean HCV-RNA drop at week 3, -4.1 ± 1.3 log(10)IU/ml), and lack of viral breakthrough during administration. Four patients (44%) reached negative HCV-RNA, maintained during silibinin treatment, vs. none in the control group, but HCV-RNA relapsed in all of them after a median of 21 days (16-28), following silibinin withdrawal. Partial responders to silibinin showed marked decreases in HCV-RNA when compared to controls, but lower than complete responders. There were no clinical adverse effects, and silibinin led to asymptomatic transient hyperbilirubinemia (week 2, 4.2 ± 2.2 vs. 2.5 ± 3.6 mg/dl; p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged intravenous silibinin monotherapy was safe in the immediate liver transplantation period, leading to a potent and time dependent antiviral effect and lack of HCV-RNA breakthrough during administration. However, HCV-RNA rebounded after withdrawal, and silibinin monotherapy did not avoid reinfection of the graft.

The magnitude of week 4 HCV RNA decay on pegylated interferon/ribavirin accurately predicts virological failure in patients with genotype 1.

BACKGROUND: Current stopping rules during pegylated interferon (peg-IFN)/ribavirin (RBV) treatment rely on week 12 HCV RNA response, but earlier identification of non-responders offers clinical and economic advantages. AIMS AND METHODS: To evaluate, among 129 HCV-genotype-1-infected, treatment-naive patients receiving peg-IFN/RBV, the feasibility of predicting treatment failure using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves after measuring week 4 HCV RNA decreases, and to assess baseline predictors of not achieving sustained virological response (SVR). RESULTS: Peg-IFN-alpha2b was used in 84.5% of patients. Fifty-three (41%) reached SVR. The best cutoff value of HCV RNA decrease at week 4 to predict non-SVR corresponded to 1 log10 IU/ml: sensitivity and negative predictive value: 100%; specificity: 64%; positive predictive value: 66%; ROC curve area: 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86-0.96). By applying this threshold, treatment could have been discontinued at week 4 in 64% of virological non-responders (49/76). By univariate analysis, baseline HCV RNA > 800,000 IU/ml (P = 0.029), older age (P = 0.011), and higher aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels (P = 0.005) or AST/alanine aminotransferase ratio values (P = 0.04) were associated with failure. After multivariate analysis, only baseline HCV RNA >800,000 IU/ml (odds ratio [OR]: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.005-4.488; P = 0.048) and higher AST levels (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.003-1.024; P = 0.011) remained statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of > or = log10 IU/ml decrease in baseline HCV RNA at week 4 was 100% predictive of treatment failure, independently associated with HCV RNA > 800,000 IU/ml and higher AST levels.

Prevention of de novo HBV infection by the presence of anti-HBs in transplanted patients receiving core antibody-positive livers.

AIM: To analyze whether the presence of anti-HBs in liver transplant recipients is effective in preventing HBV infection. METHODS: Twenty-three patients receiving anti-HBc positive liver were studied. Nine recipients were anti-HBc positive as a result of previous HBV infection. Of them, one also received HBV vaccine during the pre-liver transplantation period. Fourteen recipients were anti-HBs positive due to HBV vaccine administered during the pre-transplant period. Liver biopsy was obtained in 10/14 anti-HBc negative/anti-HBs positive recipients and in 4/9 anti-HBc positive recipients. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up period of 46 months, 1 recipient with protective serum anti-HBs levels developed de novo HBV infection as a consequence of immune escape HBV mutants. Among the 14 vaccinated anti-HBc negative/anti-HBs positive recipients, 1/10 patients with available liver biopsy (10%) had liver HBV-DNA at 13 mo post-liver transplantation without serum viral markers and did not develop de novo HBV infection. The vaccinated anti-HBc positive recipient without HBV vaccine response was HBV-DNA positive in serum and liver, viral DNA was continuously negative in the following tests, so a spontaneous seroconversion was diagnosed. CONCLUSION: The presence of anti-HBs as a result of HBV vaccine or past HBV infection seems to be effective at protecting patients receiving livers from anti-HBc positive donors. However, the emergence of immune escape HBV mutants, which can evade the anti-HBs protection, should be considered as a risk of HBV infection.

Response of TT virus to IFN plus ribavirin treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

AIM: TT virus (TTV) is a newly described DNA virus related to postransfusion hepatitis that produces persistent viremia in the absence of clinical manifestations. PEG-IFN plus ribavirin have been useful in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection. This study investigated the responses of TT virus (TTV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) to PEG-IFN plus ribavirin therapy. METHODS: Fifteen patients infected with HCV were treated with PEG-IFN(0.5 microg/body weight/week) and ribavirin (1 000 mg-1 200 mg/daily) for 48 weeks. Blood samples were drawn at the beginning and the end of the therapy. Serum TTV DNA and HCV RNA were quantified by real time PCR. RESULTS: At the beginning of treatment, TTV infection was detected in 10/15 (66.6%) of HCV-infected patients. Loss of serum TTV DNA at the end of therapy occurred in 6/10 (60%) patients. Out of these 6 patients, 4 (67%) became positive for TTV DNA after 6 months of therapy. Regarding HCV viremia, 11/15 (73%) patients were negative for serum HCV RNA after 48 weeks of therapy, 7/11 (64%) of these cases also became negative for TTV DNA following the combined treatment. In the 3/4 (75%) patients who were positive for HCV RNA at the end of therapy, TTV DNA was detected as well. Sustained HCV response at 6 months after treatment was 53% (8/15). CONCLUSION: No TTV sustained response can be achieved in any patient after PEG-IFN plus ribavirin administration.

Partial splenic embolization for the treatment of hypersplenism in cirrhotic HIV/HCV patients prior to pegylated interferon and ribavirin.

Partial splenic embolization (PSE), a non-surgical treatment for hypersplenism, has also been reported to improve hepatic function. As severe thrombocytopaenia or leukopaenia contraindicate the use of combined therapy with pegylated interferons (PEG-IFNs) and ribavirin (RBV) in HCV-related cirrhosis, we evaluated, from July 2002 to October 2003, the safety and effectiveness of PSE as a procedure to allow therapy for HCV in three Child-Pugh class B cirrhotic patients with hypersplenism and HIV co-infection. HCV genotypes were 1b (n=2) and 3a (n=1). Severe thrombocytopaenia (in all) and leukopaenia (in two) precluded therapy for HCV. PSE was successfully performed in all with a mean infarcted area of 80%, leading to a significant increase in platelet and leukocyte counts that allowed therapy with weight-adjusted RBV and PEG-IFN-alpha-2b (patients 1 and 3) or 180 microg of PEG-IFN-alpha-2a (patient 2) 8 weeks after the procedure. Moderate pain, well controlled with conservative measures, followed PSE in 100% of cases, but during follow-up (mean 422 days) there were no infectious complications or liver decompensation episodes. Although preliminary, these results suggest the potential role of PSE in HIV/HCV-cirrhotic subjects with hypersplenism as a procedure to allow the use of combined PEG-IFN and RBV.