[A comparative evaluation of the efficacy of the excisional new attachment procedure (ENAP) relative to root planing in the etiological phase of periodontal therapy]. / Valutazione comparativa dell'efficacia della excisional new attachment procedure (ENAP) nei confronti della levigatura radicolare nella fase etiologica della terapia parodontale.

BACKGROUND: In the present study, the effectiveness of root planing has been compared to the excisional new attachment procedure (ENAP) during the etiological phase of periodontal therapy, after the supragingival scaling, in order to establish if a technique offering an easy access to the subgingival areas could reduce the need for a surgical phase in the periodontal treatment. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients, affected by moderate periodontitis, participated in this study; in each of them root planing was performed in a half of the oral cavity (control site) and the ENAP in the other half (test site). The main clinical parameters of periodontal health (probing depth--PD-, attachment loss--AL-, plaque index--PlI- and gingival index--GI-) were evaluated before and 1, 2 and 6 months after the periodontal treatment. RESULTS: The results of the study showed that the parameters related with the amount of plaque and with the conditions of the marginal gingival tissue were not influenced by the different treatments used. Better improvements were found in PD and AL values in teeth treated by ENAP compared to those treated by root planing; this result is explained by a better access to the roots offered by the ENAP. CONCLUSIONS: We can conclude that, within the limits of the present study, the ENAP can reduce the need for a further surgical treatment of the periodontal patient.

Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and dental rubber dam barrier membranes in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects. A comparative clinical trial.

As observed in previous case reports, dental rubber dam (DRD) can be utilized as a barrier membrane in the guided tissue regeneration (GTR) technique for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects. The purpose of the present study was (1) to confirm the validity of DRD as a suitable material in regenerative procedures and (2) to compare, in a split-mouth clinical trial, the effectiveness of DRD-made membranes in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects versus that of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) barriers. 22 systemically healthy non-smoker adult periodontitis patients (7 male, 15 female) aged between 35 to 58 years were selected for the study. In each patient, a couple of 2-3 wall intrabony defects, located in different quadrants, were treated by a GTR technique using DRD (test sites) and e-PTFE (control sites), respectively. Performing a strict control of the oral hygiene level and of the marginal gingival health during the whole period of study, clinical (pocket probing depth, PPD; probing attachment level, PAL; gingival recession, GR) and intrasurgical (depth of the defect's intraosseous component, IOC; level of the alveolar crest, ACL) parameters were recorded at baseline and at the 1-year re-entry procedure in each experimental site. Furthermore, the coronal level of the newly formed tissue from the base of the defect (NFTL) and the vertical bone gain (VBG) were calculated at the time of membrane removal and after the re-entry procedure respectively. Membranes were removed from both test and control sites after 5 weeks; however, exposure of the membrane always occurred in test sites whereas it was observed in only 6 out of 22 control sites, this fact leading to an incomplete coverage of the regenerated tissue by the gingival flap in 18 out of 22 test sites. In both test and control sites, a statistically significant improvement of clinical and intrasurgical parameters occurred at the end of the study period; however, a significantly greater improvement was observed in control sites for PAL (+4.0 mm versus +3.0 mm; p<0.05) and VBG (3.9 mm versus 2.9 mm; p<0.05) although at the time of membrane removal, NFTL was similar between the experimental sites (test: 5.8; control: 5.6; p>0.05). Conversely, test sites exhibited a statistically significant greater increase in gingival recession (+1.9 versus +1.2; p<0.05) and alveolar crest resorption (-1.1 versus -0.3, p<0.01) in comparison to controls. It was concluded that (1) DRD is a suitable material to be used as a barrier membrane in GTR procedures although (2) e-PTFE membranes can provide a greater improvement in PAL and VBG, probably because of the difficulty in completely covering the regenerated tissue due to the fact that the gingival tissues have undergone a consistent recession in DRD-treated sites. Further studies are needed to demonstrate if an adequate coverage of the regenerated tissue in DRD-treated sites can eliminate these differences.

[Hyperplastic gingival lesions in pregnancy. I. Epidemiology, pathology and clinical aspects]. / Lesioni gengivali iperplastiche in gravidanza. Nota I. Epidemiologia, patologia e clinica.

The principal aspects of the hyperplastic pathology which frequently appears during pregnancy and its epidemiological and clinical aspects are discussed. The existence of a particular kind of gingivitis, typical in pregnancy, not different from that appearing in not-pregnant women, let to hypothesize the existence of a relationship between the gingival lesion and the particular hormonal condition observed in pregnancy. Sometimes pregnancy gingivitis can show a tendency towards localized hyperplasia, this condition is defined pregnancy granuloma. Clinically a mass of variable size is observed; generally it appears in the 2 degrees-3 degrees month of pregnancy, with a tendency to bleeding and a possible interference with mastication. From a histological point of view, the pregnancy granuloma presents an inflammatory component characterized by lynphocytes, plasmacells and neutrophiles, an abundant vascular component with newly formed capillars and a great proliferation of fibroblasts. The differential diagnosis of pregnancy granuloma must be done with some forms of gingival hyperplasia, with pyogenic granuloma and with fibrous epulis (or hyperplasia). As to therapy, it is better to perform the surgical removal after delivery, considering that sometimes the lesions can spontaneously disappear. These lesions can reappear in a subsequent pregnancy.