Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
BMC Surg ; 23(1): 166, 2023 Jun 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37340380

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: thoracolumbar burst fractures are associated with spinal canal occupation. The indirect decompression of the spinal canal and reduction of the fragment can be achieved with the distraction of the middle column and ligamentotaxis. Nevertheless, the factors that influence the effectiveness of this procedure and its temporality are controversial. METHODS: The aim of this observational, cross-sectional study was to evaluate the effectiveness of indirect reduction by ligamentotaxis in thoracolumbar burst fractures according to the fracture's radiologic characteristics and the procedure's temporality. Patients diagnosed with a thoracolumbar burst fracture between 2010 and 2021 were submitted to indirect reduction by distraction and ligamentotaxis. A retrospective analysis of radiologic characteristics and temporality of the procedure was performed with an independent sample t-test or Pearson's correlation coefficient, as required. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients were included in the analysis. Postoperatively, ligamentotaxis significantly improved all radiologic parameters (canal occupation, endplates distance, and vertebra height). Still, none of the radiological characteristics of the fracture (width, height, position, sagittal angle) were associated with the postoperative change in canal occupation. The endplates distance and the temporality of ligamentotaxis significantly predicted the reduction of the fracture. CONCLUSION: Fragment reduction effectiveness is more significant when performed as early as possible and adequate distraction is achieved using the internal fixator system. The radiologic characteristics of the fractured fragment do not determine its reduction capacity.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Compression , Spinal Fractures , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Spinal Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery , Thoracic Vertebrae/injuries , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods
2.
Medwave ; 18(8): e7370, 2018 Dec 11.
Article in Spanish, English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30550534

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of acute appendicitis using laparoscopy reduces the risk of wound infection, hospitalization time and return to normal activity. However, it increases the risk of intra-abdominal abscess, which is one the main complications of complicated appendicitis. METHODS: We searched in Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We identified six systematic reviews including 55 studies overall, of which four were randomized trials. We concluded that the used of laparoscopy, compared to open appendectomy, probably reduces the time of hospital stay, and may reduce the risk of wound infection, but there's no clarity regarding the incidence of intra-abdominal abscess due to the very low certainty of the evidence available.


INTRODUCCIÓN: El tratamiento de la apendicitis aguda por vía laparoscópica reduce el riesgo de infección de la herida operatoria, disminuye el tiempo de hospitalización y acelera el retorno a las actividades. Sin embargo, aumenta el riesgo de infecciones intraabdominales, lo cual constituye uno de las principales riesgos del tratamiento quirúrgico laparoscópico de la apendicitis complicada. MÉTODOS: Realizamos una búsqueda en Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud, la cual es mantenida mediante el cribado de múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Extrajimos los datos desde las revisiones identificadas, analizamos los datos de los estudios primarios, realizamos un metanálisis y preparamos una tabla de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. RESULTADOS Y CONCLUSIONES: Identificamos seis revisiones sistemáticas que en conjunto incluyen 55 estudios primarios, de los cuales, cuatro corresponden a ensayos aleatorizados. Concluimos que la laparoscopía, en comparación con la cirugía abierta, probablemente disminuye el tiempo de estadía hospitalaria, y podría disminuir el riesgo de infección de la herida operatoria, pero no está claro si existen diferencias en la incidencia de absceso intraabdominal porque la certeza de la evidencia es muy baja.


Subject(s)
Appendectomy/methods , Appendicitis/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Abdominal Abscess/epidemiology , Databases, Factual , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...