Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
J Clin Densitom ; 27(2): 101471, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38306806

ABSTRACT

Osteoporosis is characterised by the loss of bone density resulting in an increased risk of fragility fractures. The clinical gold standard for diagnosing osteoporosis is based on the areal bone mineral density (aBMD) used as a surrogate for bone strength, in combination with clinical risk factors. Finite element (FE) analyses based on quantitative computed tomography (QCT) have been shown to estimate bone strength better than aBMD. However, their application in the osteoporosis clinics is limited due to exposure of patients to increased X-rays radiation dose. Statistical modelling methods (3D-DXA) enabling the estimation of 3D femur shape and volumetric bone density from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan have been shown to improve osteoporosis management. The current study used 3D-DXA based FE analyses to estimate femur strength from the routine clinical DXA scans and compared its results against 151 QCT based FE analyses, in a clinical cohort of 157 subjects. The linear regression between the femur strength predicted by QCT-FE and 3D-DXA-FE models correlated highly (coefficient of determination R2 = 0.86) with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 397 N. In conclusion, the current study presented a 3D-DXA-FE modelling tool providing accurate femur strength estimates noninvasively, compared to QCT-FE models.


Subject(s)
Absorptiometry, Photon , Bone Density , Femur , Finite Element Analysis , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Humans , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Female , Aged , Middle Aged , Male , Osteoporosis/diagnostic imaging , Osteoporosis/physiopathology , Aged, 80 and over
2.
Arch Osteoporos ; 15(1): 8, 2020 01 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31897775

ABSTRACT

A case-control study assessing the association of DXA-derived 3D measurements at lumbar spine with osteoporotic hip fractures was performed. Stronger association was found between transcervical hip fractures and integral (AUC = 0.726), and cortical (AUC = 0.696) measurements at the lumbar spine compared with measurements at the trabecular bone (AUC = 0.617); although femur areal bone mineral density (aBMD) remains the referent measurement for hip fracture risk evaluation (AUC = 0.838). PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between DXA-derived 3D measurements at lumbar spine and osteoporotic hip fractures. METHODS: We analyzed a case-control database composed by 61 women with transcervical hip fractures and 61 age-matched women without any type of fracture. DXA scans at lumbar spine were acquired, and areal bone mineral density (aBMD) was measured. Integral, trabecular and cortical volumetric BMD (vBMD), cortical thickness, and cortical surface BMD (sBMD) at different regions of interest were assessed using a DXA-based 3D modeling software. Descriptive statistics, tests of difference, odds ratio (OR), and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) were used to compare hip fracture and control groups. RESULTS: Integral vBMD, cortical vBMD, cortical sBMD, and cortical thickness were the DXA-derived 3D measurements at lumbar spine that showed the stronger association with transcervical hip fractures, with AUCs in the range of 0.685-0.726, against 0.670 for aBMD. The highest AUC (0.726) and OR (2.610) at the lumbar spine were found for integral vBMD at the posterior vertebral elements. Significantly, lower AUC (0.617) and OR (1.607) were found for trabecular vBMD at the vertebral body. Overall, total femur aBMD remains the DXA-derived measurement showing the highest AUC (0.838) and OR (6.240). CONCLUSION: This study showed the association of DXA-derived measurements at lumbar spine with transcervical hip fractures. A strong association between vBMD at the posterior vertebral elements and transcervical hip fractures was observed, probably because of global deterioration of the cortical bone. Further studies should be carried out to investigate on the relative risk of transcervical fracture in patients with long-term cortical structural deterioration.


Subject(s)
Femoral Neck Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Hip Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Osteoporotic Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Absorptiometry, Photon/methods , Aged , Bone Density/physiology , Case-Control Studies , Cortical Bone/diagnostic imaging , Female , Femoral Neck Fractures/physiopathology , Hip Fractures/physiopathology , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Middle Aged , Osteoporotic Fractures/complications , Osteoporotic Fractures/physiopathology
3.
J Clin Densitom ; 22(2): 214-218, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30017573

ABSTRACT

The 3D distribution of the cortical and trabecular bone mass is a critical component in determining the resistance of a bone to fracture that is not assessed in standard dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) exams. In this work, we assessed in vivo short-term precision of measurements provided by 3D modeling techniques from DXA scans and trend assessment intervals (TAIs) in postmenopausal women. Subjects included to study precision errors were scanned twice, with repositioning for duplicate hip scans, using either a Lunar iDXA scanner (GE Healthcare, Madison, WI) or a Discovery W scanner (Hologic, Inc., Waltham, MA). Postmenopausal women having baseline and 18-mo follow-up visit were scanned using a Lunar iDXA device to assess TAIs. TAIs indicate what time intervals are required to allow accurate assessment of response to treatment or progression of disease. The 3D-SHAPER software (Galgo Medical, Barcelona, Spain) was used to derive 3D measurements from hip DXA scans. Least significant changes were 10.39 and 8.72 mg/cm3 for integral volumetric bone mineral density (BMD), 9.64 and 9.59 mg/cm3 for trabecular volumetric BMD, and 6.25 and 5.99 mg/cm2 for cortical surface BMD, using the Lunar iDXA and Discovery W scanners, respectively. TAIs in postmenopausal women were 2.9 yr (integral volumetric BMD), 2.6 yr (trabecular volumetric BMD), and 3.5 yr (cortical surface BMD), using the Lunar iDXA scanner. As a comparison, TAIs for areal BMD were 2.8 yr at neck and 2.7 yr at total femur. Least significant changes of measurements provided by 3D modeling techniques from DXA were assessed. TAIs in postmenopausal women were similar to those measured for areal BMD measurements. DXA-derived 3D measurements could potentially provide additional indicators to improve patient monitoring in clinical practices.


Subject(s)
Cancellous Bone/diagnostic imaging , Cortical Bone/diagnostic imaging , Femur Neck/diagnostic imaging , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/diagnostic imaging , Absorptiometry, Photon , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Density , Female , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Models, Statistical , Postmenopause
5.
IEEE Trans Med Imaging ; 37(12): 2651-2662, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29994113

ABSTRACT

Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) is the standard exam for osteoporosis diagnosis and fracture risk evaluation at the spine. However, numerous patients with bone fragility are not diagnosed as such. In fact, standard analysis of DXA images does not differentiate between trabecular and cortical bone; neither specifically assess of the bone density in the vertebral body, which is where most of the osteoporotic fractures occur. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) is an alternative technique that overcomes limitations of DXA-based diagnosis. However, due to the high cost and radiation dose, QCT is not used for osteoporosis management. We propose a method that provides a 3-D subject-specific shape and density estimation of the lumbar spine from a single anteroposterior (AP) DXA image. A 3-D statistical shape and density model is built, using a training set of QCT scans, and registered onto the AP DXA image so that its projection matches it. Cortical and trabecular bone compartments are segmented using a model-based algorithm. Clinical measurements are performed at different bone compartments. Accuracy was evaluated by comparing DXA-derived to QCT-derived 3-D measurements for a validation set of 180 subjects. The shape accuracy was 1.51 mm at the total vertebra and 0.66 mm at the vertebral body. Correlation coefficients between DXA and QCT-derived measurements ranged from 0.81 to 0.97. The method proposed offers an insightful 3-D analysis of the lumbar spine, which could potentially improve osteoporosis and fracture risk assessment in patients who had an AP DXA scan of the lumbar spine without any additional examination.


Subject(s)
Absorptiometry, Photon/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adult , Aged , Algorithms , Bone Density/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Statistical , Osteoporosis/diagnostic imaging
6.
J Clin Densitom ; 21(4): 550-562, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28624339

ABSTRACT

Structural parameters of the proximal femur evaluate the strength of the bone and its susceptibility to fracture. These parameters are computed from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) or from quantitative computed tomography (QCT). The 3-dimensional (3D)-DXA software solution provides 3D models of the proximal femur shape and bone density from anteroposterior DXA scans. In this paper, we present and evaluate a new approach to compute structural parameters using 3D-DXA software. A cohort of 60 study subjects (60.9 ± 14.7 yr) with DXA and QCT examinations was collected. 3D femoral models obtained by QCT and 3D-DXA software were aligned using rigid registration techniques for comparison purposes. Geometric, cross-sectional, and volumetric structural parameters were computed at the narrow neck, intertrochanteric, and lower shaft regions for both QCT and 3D-DXA models. The accuracy of 3D-DXA structural parameters was evaluated in comparison with QCT. Correlation coefficients (r) between geometric parameters computed by QCT and 3D-DXA software were 0.86 for the femoral neck axis length and 0.71 for the femoral neck shaft angle. Correlation coefficients ranged from 0.86 to 0.96 for the cross-sectional parameters and from 0.84 to 0.97 for the volumetric structural parameters. Our study demonstrated that accurate estimates of structural parameters for the femur can be obtained from 3D-DXA models. This provides clinicians with 3D indexes related to the femoral strength from routine anteroposterior DXA scans, which could potentially improve osteoporosis management and fracture prevention.


Subject(s)
Absorptiometry, Photon/methods , Femur/anatomy & histology , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Male , Middle Aged , Software
7.
Front Aging Neurosci ; 9: 268, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28848425

ABSTRACT

Mutations in human collagen VI genes cause a spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions in children and adults collectively termed collagen VI-related myopathies (COL6-RM) characterized by a varying degree of muscle weakness and joint contractures and which include Ullrich Congenital Muscular Dystrophy (UCMD) and Bethlem Myopathy (BM). Given that collagen VI is one of the most abundant extracellular matrix proteins in adipose tissue and its emerging role in energy metabolism we hypothesized that collagen VI deficiency might be associated with alterations in adipose tissue distribution and adipokines serum profile. We analyzed body composition by means of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in 30 pediatric and adult COL6-RM myopathy patients representing a range of severities (UCMD, intermediate-COL6-RM, and BM). We found a distinctive pattern of regional adipose tissue accumulation which was more evident in children at the most severe end of the spectrum. In particular, the accumulation of fat in the android region was a distinguishing feature of UCMD patients. In parallel, there was a decrease in lean mass compatible with a state of sarcopenia, particularly in ambulant children with an intermediate phenotype. All children and adult patients that were sarcopenic were also obese. These changes were significantly more pronounced in children with collagen VI deficiency than in children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy of the same ambulatory status. High molecular weight adiponectin and leptin were significantly increased in sera from children in the intermediate and BM group. Correlation analysis showed that the parameters of fat mass were negatively associated with motor function according to several validated outcome measures. In contrast, lean mass parameters correlated positively with physical performance and quality of life. Leptin and adiponectin circulating levels correlated positively with fat mass parameters and negatively with lean mass and thus may be relevant to the disease pathogenesis and as circulating markers. Taken together our results indicate that COL6-RM are characterized by specific changes in total fat mass and distribution which associate with disease severity, motor function, and quality of life and which are clinically meaningful and thus should be taken into consideration in the management of these patients.

8.
Med Phys ; 43(4): 1945, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27036590

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Cortical thickness and density are critical components in determining the strength of bony structures. Computed tomography (CT) is one possible modality for analyzing the cortex in 3D. In this paper, a model-based approach for measuring the cortical bone thickness and density from clinical CT images is proposed. METHODS: Density variations across the cortex were modeled as a function of the cortical thickness and density, location of the cortex, density of surrounding tissues, and imaging blur. High resolution micro-CT data of cadaver proximal femurs were analyzed to determine a relationship between cortical thickness and density. This thickness-density relationship was used as prior information to be incorporated in the model to obtain accurate measurements of cortical thickness and density from clinical CT volumes. The method was validated using micro-CT scans of 23 cadaver proximal femurs. Simulated clinical CT images with different voxel sizes were generated from the micro-CT data. Cortical thickness and density were estimated from the simulated images using the proposed method and compared with measurements obtained using the micro-CT images to evaluate the effect of voxel size on the accuracy of the method. Then, 19 of the 23 specimens were imaged using a clinical CT scanner. Cortical thickness and density were estimated from the clinical CT images using the proposed method and compared with the micro-CT measurements. Finally, a case-control study including 20 patients with osteoporosis and 20 age-matched controls with normal bone density was performed to evaluate the proposed method in a clinical context. RESULTS: Cortical thickness (density) estimation errors were 0.07 ± 0.19 mm (-18 ± 92 mg/cm(3)) using the simulated clinical CT volumes with the smallest voxel size (0.33 × 0.33 × 0.5 mm(3)), and 0.10 ± 0.24 mm (-10 ± 115 mg/cm(3)) using the volumes with the largest voxel size (1.0 × 1.0 × 3.0 mm(3)). A trend for the cortical thickness and density estimation errors to increase with voxel size was observed and was more pronounced for thin cortices. Using clinical CT data for 19 of the 23 samples, mean errors of 0.18 ± 0.24 mm for the cortical thickness and 15 ± 106 mg/cm(3) for the density were found. The case-control study showed that osteoporotic patients had a thinner cortex and a lower cortical density, with average differences of -0.8 mm and -58.6 mg/cm(3) at the proximal femur in comparison with age-matched controls (p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This method might be a promising approach for the quantification of cortical bone thickness and density using clinical routine imaging techniques. Future work will concentrate on investigating how this approach can improve the estimation of mechanical strength of bony structures, the prevention of fracture, and the management of osteoporosis.


Subject(s)
Bone Density , Cortical Bone/diagnostic imaging , Cortical Bone/physiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Femur/physiology , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Biological
9.
Med Image Anal ; 17(4): 475-87, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23466075

ABSTRACT

Current vertebral fracture prevention measures use Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) to quantify the density of the vertebrae and subsequently determine the risk of fracture. This modality however only provides information about the projected Bone Mineral Density (BMD) while the shape and spatial distribution of the bone determines the strength of the vertebrae. Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) allows for the measurement of the vertebral dimensions and volumetric densities, which have been shown to be able to determine the fracture risk more reliably than DXA. However, for the high cost and high radiation dose, QCT is not used in clinical routine for fracture risk assessment. In this work, we therefore propose a method to reconstruct the 3D shape and density volume of lumbar vertebrae from an anteroposterior (AP) and lateral DXA image used in clinical routine. The method is evaluated for the L2, L3 and L4 vertebra. Of these vertebrae a statistical model of the vertebral shape and density distribution is first constructed from a large dataset of QCT scans. All three models are then simultaneously registered onto both AP and lateral DXA image. The shape and volumetric BMD at several regions of the reconstructed vertebrae is then evaluated with respect to the ground truth QCT volumes. For the L2, L3 and L4 vertebrae respectively the shape was reconstructed with a mean (2RMS) point-to-surface distance of 1.00 (2.64) mm, 0.93(2.52) mm and 1.34(3.72) mm and a strong correlation (r > 0.82) was found between the trabecular volumetric BMD extracted from the reconstructions and from the same subject QCT scans. These results indicate that the proposed method is able to accurately reconstruct the 3D shape and density volume of the lumbar vertebrae from AP and lateral DXA, which can potentially improve the fracture risk estimation accuracy with respect to the currently used DXA derived areal BMD measurements.


Subject(s)
Absorptiometry, Photon/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Patient Positioning/methods , Pattern Recognition, Automated/methods , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Algorithms , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
10.
Bone ; 51(5): 896-901, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22959281

ABSTRACT

Although the areal Bone Mineral Density (BMD) measurements from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) are able to discriminate between hip fracture cases and controls, the femoral strength is largely determined by the 3D bone structure. In a previous work a statistical model was presented which parameterizes the 3D shape and BMD distribution of the proximal femur. In this study the parameter values resulting from the registration of the model onto DXA images are evaluated for their hip fracture discrimination ability with respect to regular DXA derived areal BMD measurements. The statistical model was constructed from a large database of QCT scans of females with an average age of 67.8 ± 17.0 years. This model was subsequently registered onto the DXA images of a fracture and control group. The fracture group consisted of 175 female patients with an average age of 66.4 ± 9.9 years who suffered a fracture on the contra lateral femur. The control group consisted of 175 female subjects with an average age of 65.3 ± 10.0 years and no fracture history. The discrimination ability of the resulting model parameter values, as well as the areal BMD measurements extracted from the DXA images were evaluated using a logistic regression analysis. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of the combined model parameters and areal BMD values was 0.840 (95% CI 0.799-0.881), whilst using only the areal BMD values resulted in an AUC of 0.802 (95% CI 0.757-0.848). These results indicate that the discrimination ability of the areal BMD values is improved by supplementing them with the model parameter values, which give a more complete representation of the subject specific shape and internal bone distribution. Thus, the presented method potentially allows for an improved hip fracture risk estimation whilst maintaining DXA as the current standard modality.


Subject(s)
Absorptiometry, Photon/methods , Hip Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Models, Statistical , Aged , Bone Density/physiology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis/diagnostic imaging , Radionuclide Imaging
11.
Med Phys ; 39(8): 5272-6, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22894452

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is used in clinical routine to provide a two-dimensional (2D) analysis of the bone mineral density (BMD). 3D reconstruction methods from 2D DXA images could improve the BMD analysis. To find the optimal configuration that should be used in clinical routine, this paper relies on a 3D reconstruction method from DXA images to compare the accuracy that can be obtained from one single-view and from multiview DXA images (two to four projections). METHODS: The 3D reconstruction method uses a statistical model and a nonrigid registration technique to recover in 3D the shape and the BMD distribution of the proximal femur. The accuracy was evaluated in vivo by comparing 3D reconstructions obtained from simulated DXA images of 30 patients (using between one and four DXA views) with quantitative computed tomography reconstructions. RESULTS: This comparison showed that the use of one single DXA provides accurate 3D reconstructions (mean shape accuracy of 1.0 mm and BMD distribution errors of 7.0%). Among the multiview configurations, the use of two views (0° and 45°) was the best compromise, increasing the accuracy of pose (mean accuracy of 0.7°/1.2°/0.9° against 1.0°/3.5°/3.3° for the single view), reducing slightly the BMD errors (5.7%) while maintaining the same shape accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The use of two views constitutes an interesting configuration when multiview DXA devices are available in clinical routine. However, the use of only one single view remains an accurate solution to recover the shape and the BMD distribution in 3D, with the advantage of a higher potential for clinical translation.


Subject(s)
Absorptiometry, Photon/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Osteoporosis/diagnostic imaging , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Aged , Algorithms , Bone Density , Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Female , Fractures, Bone/diagnosis , Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Middle Aged , Models, Statistical , Regression Analysis , Reproducibility of Results
12.
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv ; 14(Pt 2): 393-400, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21995053

ABSTRACT

This work presents a statistical model of both the shape and Bone Mineral Density (BMD) distribution of the proximal femur for fracture risk assessment. The shape and density model was built from a dataset of Quantitative Computed Tomography scans of fracture patients and a control group. Principal Component Analysis and Horn's parallel analysis were used to reduce the dimensionality of the shape and density model to the main modes of variation. The input data was then used to analyze the model parameters for the optimal separation between the fracture and control group. Feature selection using the Fisher criterion determined the parameters with the best class separation, which were used in Fisher Linear Discriminant Analysis to find the direction in the parameter space that best separates the fracture and control group. This resulted in a Fisher criterion value of 6.70, while analyzing the Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry derived femur neck areal BMD of the same subjects resulted in a Fisher criterion value of 0.98. This indicates that a fracture risk estimation approach based on the presented model might improve upon the current standard clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Femoral Fractures/pathology , Fracture Healing , Absorptiometry, Photon/methods , Adult , Algorithms , Bone Density , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Female , Femur Neck/pathology , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Middle Aged , Models, Statistical , Risk Assessment , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
13.
IEEE Trans Med Imaging ; 30(12): 2101-14, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21803681

ABSTRACT

The accurate diagnosis of osteoporosis has gained increasing importance due to the aging of our society. Areal bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is an established criterion in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. This measure, however, is limited by its two-dimensionality. This work presents a method to reconstruct both the 3D bone shape and 3D BMD distribution of the proximal femur from a single DXA image used in clinical routine. A statistical model of the combined shape and BMD distribution is presented, together with a method for its construction from a set of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scans. A reconstruction is acquired in an intensity based 3D-2D registration process whereby an instance of the model is found that maximizes the similarity between its projection and the DXA image. Reconstruction experiments were performed on the DXA images of 30 subjects, with a model constructed from a database of QCT scans of 85 subjects. The accuracy was evaluated by comparing the reconstructions with the same subject QCT scans. The method presented here can potentially improve the diagnosis of osteoporosis and fracture risk assessment from the low radiation dose and low cost DXA devices currently used in clinical routine.


Subject(s)
Absorptiometry, Photon/methods , Bone Density/physiology , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Absorptiometry, Photon/instrumentation , Adult , Aged , Female , Femur/anatomy & histology , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/instrumentation , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Phantoms, Imaging , Reproducibility of Results
14.
J Clin Densitom ; 11(1): 163-87, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18442758

ABSTRACT

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is commonly used in the care of patients for diagnostic classification of osteoporosis, low bone mass (osteopenia), or normal bone density; assessment of fracture risk; and monitoring changes in bone density over time. The development of other technologies for the evaluation of skeletal health has been associated with uncertainties regarding their applications in clinical practice. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS), a technology for measuring properties of bone at peripheral skeletal sites, is more portable and less expensive than DXA, without the use of ionizing radiation. The proliferation of QUS devices that are technologically diverse, measuring and reporting variable bone parameters in different ways, examining different skeletal sites, and having differing levels of validating data for association with DXA-measured bone density and fracture risk, has created many challenges in applying QUS for use in clinical practice. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) 2007 Position Development Conference (PDC) addressed clinical applications of QUS for fracture risk assessment, diagnosis of osteoporosis, treatment initiation, monitoring of treatment, and quality assurance/quality control. The ISCD Official Positions on QUS resulting from this PDC, the rationale for their establishment, and recommendations for further study are presented here.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging , Osteoporosis/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography/standards , Bone Density , Female , Humans , Male , Risk Assessment , Societies, Medical
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...