ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine the change in Framingham risk score (FRS) arising from short-term treatment with ziprasidone or olanzapine. METHOD: Hospitalized adults with a primary DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizo-affective disorder were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with ziprasidone or olanzapine from November 21, 1998 to September 28, 2000. Data on fasting lipid levels were collected at screening and endpoint, and blood pressure was measured at screening and baseline and weekly until week 6 of treatment (or last visit). FRS for patients aged ≥30 years was calculated using an algorithm derived from the Framingham Heart Study. Baseline-to-endpoint least-squares mean changes in age-adjusted FRS by gender were compared using analysis of covariance (baseline adjusted). RESULTS: Men who received olanzapine demonstrated a mean increase in their total cholesterol levels (+18.5 mg/dL; N = 53) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (+13.0 mg/dL; N = 45), whereas men who received ziprasidone demonstrated a mean decrease in their total cholesterol levels (-8.5 mg/dL; N = 44) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (-7.2 mg/dL; N = 40) (p = .0006 and p = .004, respectively). Additionally, men who received olanzapine showed an increase in baseline FRS (+7.69%; N = 53), whereas men who received ziprasidone showed a decrease in baseline FRS (-11.06%; N = 42) (p = .09). In women, treatment differences in FSR numerically favored ziprasidone but were not statistically significant. Neither treatment had a significant effect on blood pressure. CONCLUSION: In short-term treatment, olanza-pine was associated with a significant worsening of lipid profile compared with ziprasidone, with a consequent increase in FRS versus ziprasidone. These findings, coupled with the significant weight gain in patients treated with olanzapine versus ziprasidone, warrant investigation in longer-term trials.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: While vascular dementia (VaD) is the second most prevalent dementia diagnosis, little is known about healthcare use and costs for VaD. PURPOSE: This study compares the healthcare use and costs of community-dwelling patients with VaD to patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), other dementias (OD), cerebrovascular disease without dementia (CVD), and patients without dementia or cerebrovascular disease (controls). METHODS: Using diagnoses codes from medical claims and encounter records, 678 VaD, 1,722 AD, 957 OD, 2,718 CVD, and 14,023 controls were identified from patients enrolled in a 100,000-member group practice Medicare HMO during 1999-2002. Annual healthcare use and costs of the study groups were compared, using regression analysis to control for patient characteristics. RESULTS: VaD patients had the highest annual costs, dollars 14,387, followed by dollars 10,716 for OD, dollars 8,254 for CVD, and dollars 7,839 for AD, and dollars 5,494 for controls (p<0.0001 for all comparisons to VaD). Despite higher total direct costs, VaD patients had lower costs for physician visits and prescription drugs compared with all study groups except OD. In contrast, CVD patients had the highest costs for these services. Moreover, hospital admissions for VaD were nearly twice those for CVD, and hospital days for VaD nearly three times those for CVD, despite the high prevalence of cardiovascular conditions for both VaD and CVD. CONCLUSIONS: VaD patients had higher healthcare costs compared to all other patient groups. The substantially higher costs for VaD compared to CVD and the differences in use of healthcare services by VaD compared to CVD suggest that dementia, not cerebrovascular disease, is a major source of the cost differences. Lower costs for physician visits and prescription drugs for VaD suggest possible opportunities for improving ambulatory care and preventing high-cost hospitalizations.
