Pathomechanics of lumbrical and flexor digitorum profundus muscle tears in climbers: A cadaveric model.

Lumbrical muscles originate on the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendons and, during fist making, they move in the same direction when FDP muscle produces maximal proximal tendon gliding. Injuries of the bipennate lumbricals have been described when a shear force acts between the origins on adjacent tendons of the FDP, as they glide in opposite directions in asymmetric hand postures. Other structures of the deep flexors complex can be affected during this injury mechanism, due to the so-called quadriga effect, which can commonly occur during sport climbing practise. Biomechanical studies are needed to better understand the pathomechanism. A cadaveric study was designed to analyse the effects of load during the fourth lumbrical muscle injury mechanism. The amount of FDP tendon gliding and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint flexion of the 5th finger were calculated. Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens (ten non-paired forearms and hands) were used. The specimens were placed on a custom-made loading apparatus. The FDP of the 5th finger was loaded, inducing isolated flexion of the 5th finger, until rupture. The rupture occurred in all specimens, under a load of 11 kg (SD 4.94), at 9.23 mm of proximal tendon gliding (SD 3.55) and at 21.4° (SD 28.91) of MCP joint flexion. Lumbrical muscle detachment from the 4th FDP was observed, from distal to proximal, and changes in FDP tendons at the distal forearm level too. The quadriga effect can lead to injury of the bipennate lumbrical muscles and the deep flexors complex in the hand and forearm.

The loads developed by epicondylar and epitrochlear muscles across the elbow joint. A dynamic simulated model.

The radio-humeral joint has traditionally been believed to support most of the loads transmitted through the elbow. Load transfer through the elbow has been a controversial issue since the publication of the first biomechanical studies on the subject, most of which were based on extrinsic forces acting on the extended joint. The present study analyzes load distribution across the six different compartments in the elbow while the joint is flexed, as well as the intrinsic forces generated in the epicondylar and epitrochlear muscles. Ten cadaveric elbows were positioned at 90° of flexion, forearm in a neutral position and wrist at 0°. Tekscan sensors were used for measuring intraarticular pressures. Forces generated by epitrochlear muscles results in a series of loads that affect mainly the anteromedial facet (40%), followed by the posterolateral facet (34%) of the ulnohumeral joint, with the flexor carpi ulnaris generating the heaviest loads (43% on the anteromedial and 38% on the posterolateral facets). Conversely, the forces generated by the epicondylar muscles, similar in behavior but with an opposite direction, convey heavier loads to the elbow's anterolateral facet (45%), followed by the radiohumeral joint (26%) with the extensor carpi ulnaris generating the heaviest loads (54% on the anterolateral facet and 17% on the radiohumeral joint). Our results indicate that the elbow joint exhibits a characteristic load distribution pattern that depends on the muscles, as intrinsic forces are generated by the epicondylar and epitrochlear muscles. The anterior portion of the ulnohumeral joint is the area bearing the heaviest loads.

Study of intraarticular pressures in the elbow joints.

The purpose of this study was to describe pressure originating in the six elbow articular compartments after muscular contractions. Ten cryopreserved cadaveric arms were dissected and the insertional tendons and capsuloligamentous tissues were preserved. The specimens were placed in a custom-made device. Elbow position was established at 90° flexion with the forearm in a neutral position and the wrist extended at 0°. Tekscan sensors sere used for measuring intraarticular pressures. Without loading the elbow, the humeroradial joint received the lowest pressure, and, among the humeroulnar joints, the highest pressure was found in the anterolateral compartment. After loading the epitrochlear muscles to the maximum (5.0 kg), the pressure increased in the anteromedial joint (0.6 kg to 3.3 kg) and decreased in the posteromedial and anterolateral joints (4.2 kg to 0.3 kg and 4.2 kg to 0.9 kg, respectively). After the same loading in the epicondylar muscles, the pressure increased in the anterolateral and humeroradial joints (4.2 kg to 8.2 kg and 0.2 kg to 1.0 kg respectively), but decreased in the posterolateral joint (3.4 kg to 1.0 kg). The pressure distribution patterns among the humeroulnar compartments depend on the muscle geometries and their origins. Understanding these patterns can be useful in applying physiotherapeutic treatments for reinforcement of different muscular groups in order to decrease pressure in certain articular compartments.