Ifosfamide, cisplatin and etoposide combination in locally advanced inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study.

From March 1993 to February 1997, 43 eligible patients with inoperable stage IIIA (ten patients) and stage IIIB (33 patients), histologically confirmed NSCLC received 3 courses of the ICE combination (ifosfamide 1.5 g m(-2) and mesna 750 mg m(-2) two times a day, cisplatin 25 mg m(-2) and etoposide 100 mg m(-2), all administered intravenously (i.v.) on days 1-3 every 3 weeks) with G-CSF support. After three cycles, patients were submitted to radical surgery or received two additional courses of the ICE regimen and/or curative radiotherapy. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 21% of 114 evaluable courses, but was of short duration, leading to neutropenic fever in 5% of the courses. Severe thrombocytopenia and anaemia were observed in 13% and 3% of the courses respectively. Non-haematological toxicity was generally mild with only two episodes of reversible renal impairment. The overall response rate after three chemotherapy courses was 69% (28 partial responses, one complete response). Ten patients (8/10 patients in stage IIIA, 2/33 patients in stage IIIB) underwent radical surgery. Median TTP for patients not undergoing surgery (n = 33) was 8 months (range 3-34+); median DFS for patients rendered NED by surgery (n = 10) was 26 months (range 1-54+). Median OS for the entire group was 12.5 months (range 2-57+). The ICE regimen is active in locally advanced NSCLC with acceptable toxicity and warrants further exploration as induction chemotherapy in larger series.

A randomized phase II study comparing sequential versus simultaneous chemo-radiotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: Single-modality radiotherapy is still considered standard treatment for patients with locally advanced unresectable cancer of the head and neck. As treatment outcome is poor, attempts to integrate chemotherapy into the overall management of these patients are ongoing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized study was undertaken to compare a sequential with a simultaneous chemoradiotherapy program. Between February 1986 and February 1991, 93 eligible patients with locally advanced unresectable cancer of the head and neck were stratified by WHO PS, T and N class and primary site and then randomized to receive either three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin (100 mg/m2 i.v. d 1) and 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2/days 1-5 by continuous i.v. infusion every 3 weeks prior to definitive conventional radiotherapy of 65-70 Gy (sequential treatment), or cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 22, 43 given simultaneously for the duration of the same conventional radiotherapy (simultaneous treatment). RESULTS: At the end of the entire treatment 18 complete responses (47%) in the sequential-treatment arm and 18 (41%) in the simultaneous treatment arm were obtained. No statistically significant differences in the 5-yr progression-free survival, in the median time to loco-regional and distant progression and in the 5-yr overall survival were observed. Leukopenia was more frequent in the simultaneous than in the sequential arm (p = 0.03), whereas alopecia (p = 0.008) and phlebitis (p < 0.0001) were more frequent in the sequential-treatment arm. A better compliance was associated with the concomitant treatment, with 87% of the patients completing the entire radiotherapy program versus 63% of those in the sequential arm (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, the two treatment arms showed similar activity (complete response, progression-free and overall survival rates). Compliance to treatment was better in the concomitant arm. These data suggest that concomitant chemo-radiation therapy might be considered an option in unresectable locally advanced cancer of the head and neck. Phase III studies are needed in order to establish the superiority of this combination of cisplatin and radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone.

Chemotherapy/radiation therapy plus/minus lonidamine in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (limited disease): preliminary results.

One hundred sixteen patients with unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were accrued in a prospective randomized trial comparing (A), chemotherapy (cisplatin and etoposide [VP-16]) for two courses plus radiation therapy (30 + 20 Gy split course), followed by an additional two courses to (B), the same regimen plus the addition of lonidamine (LND). There were 93 patients evaluable for response (46 in the chemotherapy/radiation arm and 47 in the chemotherapy/radiation/LND arm). One hundred fifteen patients were evaluable for toxicity. The overall response rates, median time to progression, and median survival time were similar in both arms. For the group of patients with squamous cell histology, time to progression was 27 weeks on arm A and 38 weeks on arm B (P = 0.01). Two-year survival in the squamous cell group in arm A was 9%, in arm B, 39%. LND does not give rise to additional toxicity, although myalgia and testicular pain are characteristic side effects.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer.

Between May 1981 and January 1986, 130 consecutive patients with advanced untreated head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with two or three courses of the CABO combination (methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) on days 1 and 15; CDDP 50 mg/m2 IV on day 4; bleomycin 10 mg IV on days 1, 8, and 15; and vincristine 2 mg IV on days 1, 8, and 15 every 3 weeks) prior to surgery and/or radiotherapy. Of the 123 patients evaluable for response to chemotherapy, 19 (15.4%) had a complete remission and 59 (48%) a partial response, yielding a 63.4% overall response rate. Response rate was significantly correlated with the performance status (PS) (P = 0.001), the stage (P = 0.005), and the T class (P = 0.02); 107 patients completed subsequent local treatment (87 with radiotherapy and 20 with surgery +/- radiotherapy). The median survival of the 124 patients evaluable for survival was 14.7 months and the overall survival rate at 3 years was 24%. The median survival and the overall survival at 3 years for the surgical subgroup were 24.7 months and 38% and for the radiotherapy subgroup were 14.3 months and 22%. These results were compared with those obtained in a historical control group of 79 patients treated in our institute with short courses of chemotherapy regimens, which did not include cisplatin, followed by radiotherapy (29 patients) or local treatments alone (26 patients with radiotherapy and 24 patients with surgery +/- radiotherapy) between January 1976 and December 1980. Most of the patient characteristics were evenly distributed (age, sex, and primary sites) except that more advanced lesions were included in the NAC group (Stage IV: 85% versus 62%; T4: 65% versus 42%; N2-3: 48% versus 29%). The overall survival was significantly higher in patients receiving NAC than in the historical control group, comparing both the groups taken as a whole (P less than 0.05) and the surgery +/- radiotherapy (P less than 0.05) and the radiotherapy (P less than 0.02) subgroups. This experience suggests a positive role of NAC on survival. However, this improvement in outcome compared with a historical control group cannot be regarded as definitive evidence for benefit to patients. Randomized studies using active regimens are required to confirm these data.