Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Knee Prosthesis , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Prosthesis Design , Female , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
The most frequent technical difficulty encountered at unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revision to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is filling in all bone defects. These bone defects can render difficult components positioning, mechanical axis restitution, and ligament balance assessment, which are the three most important parameters for successful TKA. We describe a computer-assisted technique which makes it possible to control these three parameters before removal of the implants that have caused the bone defects. Our study is based on a series of 20 cases, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The anatomical and clinical results were very satisfying and comparable to results of primary TKA. We recommend this computer-navigated technique, which is as simple as a primary TKA procedure.
Subject(s)
Knee Prosthesis , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Reoperation/methods , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Failure , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to compare the results of arthroscopic with open arthrotomy reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament, as treatment of chronic anterior laxity. 54 knees (among 63) were evaluated, 33 reconstructions were performed according to Kenneth Jones technique with arthrotomy (from 1990 to may 1993) and 21 were arthroscopically-assisted (from may 1993 to 1996). Meniscectomy was associated respectively in 22 and 7 cases. The average interval between initial injury and surgery was 18 and 18.6 months. Follow-up was one year at least. We evaluated mobility, amyotrophy and quadriceps and hamstrings muscular deficit: static at 1 month and using Cybex isokinetic tests at 2, 3 and 6 months and 1 year. Postoperative residual laxity and Arpege cotation were evaluated at 1 year. Student and Mann Whitney tests were used for statistical evaluation. As complication we noted respectively after arthrotomy and after arthroscopy: 7 (21.2 p. 100) and 4 (19 p. 100) algodystrophy, 1 (3 p. 100) and 1 (4., 7 p. 100) Cyclops syndrome, and 2 (6 p. 100) and 1 (4.7 p. 100) anterior knee pain. Lack of extension and flexion were respectively -5.4 degrees/130 degrees and -1.9 degrees/136 degrees at 3 months (p = 0.04) and -3.5/134 degrees and -1.5 degrees/138 degrees at 6 months (not significative). At 1 month, static hamstrings deficit was 41.3 p. 100 after open arthrotomy and 29.6 p. 100 after arthroscopic assisted (p = 0.05). At 2 months, isokinetic hamstrings deficit was lower after arthroscopic assisted (21.6 p. 100 at 60 degrees; 20.8 p. 100 at 180 degrees) than after open arthrotomy (32.8 p. 100; 32.5 p. 100) (p = 0.039 and 0.008). This difference was found for hamstrings until 3 months. At 6 months and 1 year, no difference was found for Cybex tests. In Arpege score, at 1 year, 73.3 p. 100 were very satisfied or satisfied after open arthrotomy and 77.7 p. 100 after arthroscopy. Global results were excellent or good in 66 p. 100 after open arthrotomy and 83 p. 100 after arthroscopy. Radiological laxity was less than 5 mm in 88 p. 100 after open arthrotomy and 92 p. 100 after arthroscopic assisted. So, after arthroscopically assisted procedure, the number of algodystrophy and anterior knee pain was lower, and until 3 months, range of motion was better and hamstrings deficit was lower. After 6 months, difference about range of motion or muscular deficit were not significative. At 1 year, after arthroscopic procedure, results seemed better with a lower rate of residual laxity and better global results, but the number of medial meniscectomies was lower in this group. In conclusion, the arthroscopic-assisted procedure seems to allow a faster rehabilitation.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Arthroscopy , Athletic Injuries/surgery , Knee Injuries/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Time FactorsABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of the anterior cruciate ligament (A.C.L.) reconstruction according to two scoring systems (Arpege and IKDC), to analyse the influence of different factors on the results, to study the effect of a lateral extra-articular tenodesis, the morbidity of patellar tendon graft harvesting, and the advantage of arthroscopically assisted reconstruction. MATERIAL: Seventy nine patients, 17 to 39 years old (average 27 years), underwent an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for chronic instability, using a free bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. In 43 cases, a lateral extra-articular plasty was added (Lemaire's procedure). The reconstruction was arthroscopically assisted in 17 cases. Interval between initial injury and surgery was 24 months (2 months to 9 years and 7 months). The average follow-up was 2.5 years (range 1 to 18). METHOD: All patients were reviewed for evaluation with two scoring systems (Arpege and IKDC). Roentgenograms of both knees, including antero-posterior weight-bearing and lateral view, patellar view, dynamic radiographs, allowed evaluation of post-operative arthrosis and residual anterior laxity in extension. Fischer's test and chi square test were used for statistical evaluation. RESULTS: Using the Arpege CLAS system, functional results were excellent or good in 75.9 per cent of cases (excellent in 44.3 per cent, good in 31.6 per cent), fair in 15.2 per cent, poor in 8.9 per cent; according to the IKDC system, 65.8 per cent were excellent or good. 84.8 per cent of the patients were satisfied in Arpege system and 91.2 per cent in IKDC system. The pivot-shift test was negative in 86 per cent, equivocal in 7.6 per cent and positive in 6.4 per cent. The radiological Lachman's test (difference between control and affected knee) was 0-2 mm in 53.2 per cent, 3-5 mm in 39.2 per cent, 6-10 mm in 7.6 per cent, never greater than 10 mm. Antero-posterior weight-bearing radiographs were normal in 83.5 per cent, showed joint remodeling in 10.1 per cent pre-arthrosis in 6.3 per cent but no arthrosis. Functional results were not correlated with age at time of surgery, interval between initial injury and surgery, nor clinical Lachman's test. Competitive sportsmen had a better result (p = 0.001). Residual laxity in extension was correlated with lesions of medial meniscus (p = 0.035). Degenerative changes in femoro-tibial joint were correlated with residual laxity in extension (p = 0.019). There was no significative difference between A.C.L. reconstruction isolated or associated with lateral extra-articular tenodesis. Time to return to work was shorter for patients with arthroscopically assisted procedure (p = 0.067). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Functional results after A.C.L. reconstruction using a free bone-patellar tendon-bone graft are satisfactory and confirm the reliability of this procedure. Arpege CLAS and IKDC systems give comparable functional results, but IKDC evaluate anatomical results, residual laxity and degenerative changes of the joint, that constitute essential long-term pronostic factors. Morbidity of patellar tendon harvesting appears to be of short duration and largely reversible. Added lateral extra-articular tenodesis doesn't improve the results. Arthroscopically assisted procedure seems to allow a faster rehabilitation.
