[Actinomyces odontolyticus isolation during prosthetic aortic graft infection with paraprosthetic duodenal fistula]. / Isolement d'Actinomyces odontolyticus au cours d'une infection de prothèse aortique avec fistule duodénoparaprothétique.

INTRODUCTION: Prosthetic vascular graft infection is a rare complication of vascular surgery. We report a case with graft enteric fistula and Actinomyces odontolyticus bacteremia. EXEGESIS: A 73 year-old man with a prosthetic aortic graft and who had a parodontal disease, has been hospitalised for fever of unknown origin. Blood cultures grew with Escherichia coli and Actinomyces odontolyticus. The imaging studies indicated graft infection. Laparotomy has confirmed the diagnosis and highlighted a polymicrobial infection and a paraprosthetic duodenal fistula. A review of the literature's data concerning prosthetic vascular graft infections is made. The role of Actinomyces odontolyticus in that case is discussed. CONCLUSION: Prosthetic aortic graft infection due to graft enteric fistula is usually a polymicrobial infection and is a late complication of aortic surgery. Imaging is essential for the diagnosis of prosthetic aortic graft infection. It is possible that Actinomyces odontolyticus has contributed to prosthesis infection in this case.

Subacute bacterial endocarditis presenting as polymyalgia rheumatica or giant cell arteritis.

OBJECTIVE: To report on several patients with subacute bacterial endocarditis who were initially presumed, incorrectly, to have polymyalgia rheumatica or giant cell arteritis. METHODS: We report 3 cases of subacute streptococcal endocarditis mimicking giant cell arteritis in 2 cases and polymyalgia rheumatica in one. We reviewed the literature through Medline search of French and English-language articles published between 1966 and 2005 and found 5 similar cases. RESULTS: Shoulder and/or pelvic girdle pain was associated with neck or back pain in all patients. Scalp tenderness, bilateral jaw pain, amaurosis fugax were present in 2 patients. One patient had no fever. Two patients were treated with corticosteroids with initial good clinical response in one. Appropriate antibiotic therapy resulted in the rapid disappearance of rheumatic complaints in 2 patients and achieved a definitive cure of endocarditis in all cases. CONCLUSION: Rheumatologic symptoms may hinder the correct diagnosis of infective endocarditis in patients who present with a clinical picture suggesting polymyalgia rheumatica or giant cell arteritis. In such cases, blood cultures should be systematically drawn.

[Ophthalmologic manifestations of systemic vasculitis: report of six cases and review of the literature]. / Manifestations ophtalmologiques des vascularites systémiques: analyse de six observations et revue de la littérature.

PURPOSE: Study of characteristics of ocular involvement in systemic vasculitis. METHODS: We describe six cases of systemic vasculitis with ocular involvement observed between 1992 and 2000. These cases are compared with those reported in the literature. RESULTS: Our patients suffered from Wegener's granulomatosis (four cases), periarteritis nodosa and Churg-Strauss syndrome. Ocular manifestations were conjunctivitis, scleritis, orbital pseudotumor, optic neuritis and extraocular muscle palsy. These manifestations are similar to those reported in the literature. Their treatment requires steroids and immunosuppressive drugs. In one of our cases, intravenous immunoglobulins were effective in controlling an optic neuritis. CONCLUSION: Ocular involvement in systemic vasculitis may concern any orbital structure. It usually occurs during the course of vasculitis but may be one of its first manifestations. It requires an appropriate treatment to prevent ophthalmic complications and especially blindness.