COVID-19 infection in first trimester of pregnancy marked by a liver cytolysis in a woman previously treated by hydroxychloroquine for repeated implantation failure: a case report.

BACKGROUND: In December 2019, a new disease (COVID-19) caused by a novel coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2 emerged in China and spread to many other countries. There is only limited data about the clinical features of COVID-19 during pregnancy, especially in first trimester. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a COVID-19 infection in a 35 years-old patient in first trimester of pregnancy and its consequent medical care. At 7 weeks of pregnancy, the patient, who did not have any pregestational comorbidities, complained of intense nausea and asthenia. An important liver cytolysis was discovered with biological perturbations of transaminases levels. No respiratory symptoms were recorded. Classical viral aetiologies and drug-related toxicity were discarded. Because of the aggravation of the symptoms and the occurrence of the breathlessness, the patient was tested for the COVID-19 in a nasopharyngeal swab. The RTq-PCR assay indicated the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. In the absence of severe symptoms, the patient was monitored at home according to the French government guidelines. After a few days, the symptoms resolved without any complications. The pregnancy is still ongoing without any visible sequelae on the foetus so far. CONCLUSIONS: This first case illustrated the difficulty of COVID-19 diagnosis in patients with isolated digestive symptoms in first trimester of pregnancy that could be confused with gravida hyperemesis. Monitoring of pregnancy after an episode of COVID-19 should be strengthened with bimonthly foetal growth ultrasounds and doppler assessments because of the risks for intrauterine growth restriction. Comprehensive data on larger numbers of first trimester gravid women with COVID-19 are required to better understanding the overall impact of SARS-CoV-2 on maternal and birth outcomes.

Embryotoxicity testing of IVF disposables: how do manufacturers test?

STUDY QUESTION: How do manufacturers perform embryotoxicity testing in their quality control programs when validating IVF consumables? SUMMARY ANSWER: The Mouse Embryo Assay (MEA) and Human Sperm Survival Assay (HSSA) used for IVF disposables differed from one manufacturer to another. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Many components used in IVF laboratories, such as culture media and disposable consumables, may negatively impact human embryonic development. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Through a questionnaire-based survey, the main manufacturers of IVF disposable devices were contacted during the period November to December 2018 to compare the methodology of the MEA and HSSA. We focused on catheters for embryo transfer, catheters for insemination, straws, serological pipettes, culture dishes and puncture needles used in the ART procedures. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: We approached the manufacturers of IVF disposables and asked for details about methodology of the MEA and HSSA performed for toxicity testing of their IVF disposable devices. All specific parameters like mouse strains, number of embryos used, culture conditions (media, temperature, atmosphere), extraction protocol, subcontracting, and thresholds were registered and compared between companies. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Twenty-one companies were approached, of which only 11 answered the questionnaire. Significant differences existed in the methodologies and thresholds of the MEA and HSSA used for toxicity testing of IVF disposables. Importantly, some of these parameters could influence the sensitivity of the tests. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although we approached the main IVF manufacturers, the response rate was relatively low. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our study confirms the high degree of heterogeneity of the embryotoxicity tests performed by manufacturers when validating their IVF disposable devices. Currently, no regulations exist on this issue. Professionals should call for and request standardization and a future higher degree of transparency as regards embryotoxicity testing from supplying companies; moreover, companies should be urged to provide the users clear and precise information about the results of their tests and how testing was performed. Future recommendations are urgently awaited to improve the sensitivity and reproducibility of embryotoxicity assays over time. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study did not receive any funding. L.D. declares a competing interest with Patrick Choay SAS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

[Polycystic ovary syndrome does not affect blastulation nor cumulative live birth rates]. / Le syndrome des ovaires polykystiques n'altère pas les taux de blastulation ni les taux cumulés de naissances vivantes.

OBJECTIVES: Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) brings complications in the management of the assisted reproductive technology (ART) because of an oocyte quality probably impaired due to modifications of intra- and extra-ovarian factors. Our study aimed to investigate the extended culture in PCOS patients and its influence on the cumulative live birth rates. METHODS: Fifty-nine PCOS patients (as defined by the Rotterdam criteria) and 114 normo-ovulatory patients (i.e. with tubal, male or idiopathic infertility, regular cycles and AMH>2ng/mL) aged<37years old who underwent a 1st or 2nd ART attempt with extended culture to day 6 were included from October 2015 to December 2017. The blastulation and cumulative live birth rates were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The PCOS and control patients were 32.22 and 32.91years old respectively (P=0.05). The median number of oocytes retrieved was significantly higher in the PCOS group and the median oocyte maturity rate significantly lower compared with controls. The blastulation rates were similar between the PCOS and the control groups, respectively 57.8% vs. 58.6%, P=0.88. Because of the risks of hyperstimulation syndrome, a freeze all strategy was achieved for 38.9% of PCOS patients vs. 14.0% of the control patients (P<0.01). The cumulative live birth rates were not statistically different: 31.7% in the PCOS group vs. 37.2% in the control group, P=0.50. CONCLUSIONS: PCOS was not observed to affect the extended culture nor the cumulative live birth rates in comparison to normo-ovulatory patients, supporting the blastocyst transfer strategy as a suitable option to PCOS patients.

[Quality of oocytes and embryos from women with polycystic ovaries syndrome: State of the art]. / Qualité ovocytaire et embryonnaire chez les femmes avec syndrome des ovaires polykystiques : état de l'art.

The frequency of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and the consequent fertility disorders cause many difficulties in the management of the assisted reproductive technics. Some studies are focused on different additional treatments, stimulation protocols or techniques that could optimize the in vitro fertilization cycles. The quality of the oocytes and embryos of these patients is also an outstanding issue. They remain difficult to actually evaluate during management, and none of the few published studies on this subject demonstrated any inferiority, compared to control patients. However, many differences have been highlighted, studying intra- and extra-ovarian factors. The advent of new genetic techniques could allow a better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of the syndrome, as well as refining the evaluation of oocytes and embryos, in order to better predict the results of in vitro fertilization attempts. Pregnancy and birth rates, however, appear to be comparable to those of the general population.