Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Immunol ; 9: 9, 2008 Mar 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18366814

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Single-cell assays of immune function are increasingly used to monitor T cell responses in immunotherapy clinical trials. Standardization and validation of such assays are therefore important to interpretation of the clinical trial data. Here we assess the levels of intra-assay, inter-assay, and inter-operator precision, as well as linearity, of CD8+ T cell IFNgamma-based ELISPOT and cytokine flow cytometry (CFC), as well as tetramer assays. RESULTS: Precision was measured in cryopreserved PBMC with a low, medium, or high response level to a CMV pp65 peptide or peptide mixture. Intra-assay precision was assessed using 6 replicates per assay; inter-assay precision was assessed by performing 8 assays on different days; and inter-operator precision was assessed using 3 different operators working on the same day. Percent CV values ranged from 4% to 133% depending upon the assay and response level. Linearity was measured by diluting PBMC from a high responder into PBMC from a non-responder, and yielded R2 values from 0.85 to 0.99 depending upon the assay and antigen. CONCLUSION: These data provide target values for precision and linearity of single-cell assays for those wishing to validate these assays in their own laboratories. They also allow for comparison of the precision and linearity of ELISPOT, CFC, and tetramer across a range of response levels. There was a trend toward tetramer assays showing the highest precision, followed closely by CFC, and then ELISPOT; while all three assays had similar linearity. These findings are contingent upon the use of optimized protocols for each assay.


Subject(s)
Cytomegalovirus/chemistry , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Flow Cytometry/methods , Interferon-gamma/analysis , Peptides/analysis , Viral Proteins/analysis , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Tissue Donors
2.
BMC Immunol ; 6: 17, 2005 Jul 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16026627

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cryopreservation of PBMC and/or overnight shipping of samples are required for many clinical trials, despite their potentially adverse effects upon immune monitoring assays such as MHC-peptide tetramer staining, cytokine flow cytometry (CFC), and ELISPOT. In this study, we compared the performance of these assays on leukapheresed PBMC shipped overnight in medium versus cryopreserved PBMC from matched donors. RESULTS: Using CMV pp65 peptide pool stimulation or pp65 HLA-A2 tetramer staining, there was significant correlation between shipped and cryopreserved samples for each assay (p

Subject(s)
Antigen Presentation , Antigens, Viral/immunology , Cryopreservation , Cytomegalovirus/immunology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Flow Cytometry , HLA-A2 Antigen/analysis , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/immunology , Phosphoproteins/immunology , Viral Matrix Proteins/immunology , Biomarkers/analysis , Cytomegalovirus Infections/blood , Cytomegalovirus Infections/immunology , HLA-A2 Antigen/immunology , Humans , Immunity, Cellular , Laboratories , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/chemistry , Peptide Fragments/immunology , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Single-Blind Method , Specimen Handling , Vaccination
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...