A survey of patterns of practice and perception of NAFLD in a large sample of practicing gastroenterologists in France.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Most studies on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) originate from tertiary care centers with an academic interest. How this emerging entity is accepted and managed by a wider body of gastroenterologists is unknown, despite significant implications for the diagnosis of at-risk subjects and the utilization of healthcare resources. METHODS: We conducted a survey among 352 French, board-certified gastroenterologists from a large variety of practices to understand the clinical burden, perceived severity, and management patterns of NAFLD. RESULTS: Half of participants saw >30 new cases (equal to HCV) of NAFLD and 40% >5 new cases of NASH-cirrhosis yearly. Only 20% of patients were referred by endocrinologists; conversely, gastroenterologists overwhelmingly referred NAFLD patients for assessment of metabolic co-morbidities. In patients with metabolic risk factors, a majority of physicians considered the diagnosis of NAFLD, even if other liver diseases co-existed. The diagnosis heavily relies on aminotransferases, hence patients with normal ALT are usually not diagnosed. Liver biopsy is performed for fibrosis staging but not for the diagnosis/grading of steatohepatitis, and mainly decided based on non-invasive fibrosis procedures. Pharmacological treatment is used despite a lack of clear evidence of efficacy. Physicians monitor patients themselves, usually twice a year. CONCLUSIONS: NAFLD is recognized and accepted as a disease in itself with potentially severe outcomes. Most at-risk patients are currently missed because of non-referral by endocrinologists and no exploration of those with normal aminotransferases. The medical need for the diagnosis and treatment of NAFLD is real in the community of gastroenterologists at large.

Safety and efficacy of combination therapy with peginterferon alfa-2a (40kD) and ribavirin in the outpatient setting: prospective analysis of 197 patients with chronic hepatitis C viral infection.

OBJECTIVES: Combination therapy using peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kD) plus ribavirin achieves viral eradication in nearly 60% of patients with chronic hepatitis C viral infection. However, because of the numerous side effects, use of the combination regimen might be restricted for patients consulting private practitioners specialized in hepatogastroenterology. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Conducted in this specific context, this prospective clinical trial investigated the safety and efficacy of combination therapy in 197 patients. Therapy was given in compliance with the recommendations of the French consensus conference on hepatitis C treatment. RESULTS: Commonly reported adverse effects were noted in 90% of patients, most occurring during the first three months, with a stable prevalence thereafter and resolution after treatment end. The most frequent adverse events were asthenia (35 to 37.5% according to the treatment group pruritus (25 to 26.3%) and flu-like syndrome (19 to 21.7%). A depressive syndrome was reported in 20 to 21% of patients. Grade 4 neutropenia was exceptional and never led to severe infections. At intent-to-treat analysis, the rate of sustained virological response was 54.8% for the entire population. It was 71.1% for patients with genotypes 2 or 3 (mainly treated for 24 weeks) and 44.6% for patients with genotype 1 (all treated 48 weeks). CONCLUSION: The characteristic features of combination therapy observed in the context of private hepatogastroenterology consultations are similar to those observed in randomized clinical trials.