ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT), a higher nucleated and CD34+ cell dose has been reported to improve various outcomes. Other cell types, such as lymphocyte subsets, also influenced BMT results. While nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) represent a subset of bone marrow (BM) cell subpopulation, the question of their quantification in BM grafts and the impact of BM processing on their recovery has not been addressed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In a prospective study on 77 BM products, NRBCs were enumerated by flow cytometry and the recovery analyzed after manipulation. Because NRBCs could compromise white blood cell count, the impact of NRBC count on CD34+ cell percentage and total nucleated cell (TNC) dose were also determined. RESULTS: The mean percentage of NRBCs in BM grafts was 21.6 percent (range, 7.8%-40.9%). Mean NRBC recoveries after BM concentration or RBC depletion were 98.4 and 28.7 percent, respectively, close to those obtained for TNC cells (88.6 and 31.3%, respectively). When corrected with NRBC count, the mean percentages of corrected CD34+ cell and TNC dose were significantly modified when compared with uncorrected values, whatever the type of BM manipulation. CONCLUSION: Our data show that NRBC quantification might be of importance to improve quality control of BM products and to evaluate the influence of NRBCs cell dose on outcomes after BMT.
Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Transplantation/methods , Cell Nucleus , Erythrocyte Count , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/cytology , Leukemia/therapy , Acute Disease , Antigens, CD34/metabolism , Bone Marrow Transplantation/standards , Chronic Disease , Erythrocytes , Flow Cytometry , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/metabolism , Humans , Prospective Studies , Quality Control , Recovery of Function , Regression Analysis , Transplantation, HomologousABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cord blood (CB) represents an alternate source of stem cells in transplantation. Nucleated red blood cells (NRBCs) are a physiological subset of CB population. Although it is important to have an accurate estimate of CD34(+) cell number, NRBCs could compromise white blood cell count and interfere with CD34(+) cell quantification. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 826 CB units were analyzed for total nucleated cells (TNCs), NRBCs, and CD34(+) cells by flow cytometry. NRBCs were also counted conventionally by manual microscopy. Percentages of CD34(+) cells corrected by NRBC count (CD34+c) were determined as follows: %CD34+c = CD34(+)/CD45(+) (x10(6))/(TNCs (x10(8)) - NRBCs (x10(8))). RESULTS: The mean percentages of CD34+ cells and NRBCs were 0.27 percent (range, 0.01%-1.25%) and 7.64 percent (range, 0.13%-84%), respectively. Comparison between flow cytometric and microscopic NRBC count showed a regression of y = 0.685 + 0.719x and a coefficient of determination of r(2) = 0.721. When corrected with NRBC count, the mean percentage of CD34(+) c cells was 0.295 percent (p = 0.0008 compared with CD34(+)%) and mean TNCc count was 14.8 x 10(8) (p < 10(-4) compared to TNC count). CONCLUSION: The determination of NRBCs with a flow cytometric method might represent a new strategy for providing satisfactory quality assurance controls of CB products.
