Real-world evidence for vitiligo using an electronic medical records database in Spain: the REVEAL-ES study.

The European prevalence of vitiligo diagnosis is 0.2%-0.8%, with country-specific and methodological differences. Although vitiligo profoundly impacts quality of life, limited studies have evaluated disease burden and treatment patterns. This real-world study describes the prevalence, incidence, characteristics, and treatment patterns of vitiligo among patients in Spain during 2015-2021. This retrospective observational study using the IQVIA Electronic Medical Records database in Spain included patients with vitiligo (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes 709.01/374.53). Incident and prevalent cohorts comprised registered patients with vitiligo diagnoses during and before 2015-2021, respectively. Patient characteristics and treatment data were extracted. Vitiligo incidence was 0.016 (95% CI: 0.014-0.018) per 100 person-years, and prevalence was 0.19% (95% CI: 0.18%-0.19%) in 2021. Females were more affected than males (0.16% vs 0.13%, respectively). Among 1,400 incident patients, mean (SD) age was 40.7 (19.7) years; most were female (53.9%). The most common comorbidities after vitiligo diagnosis were eczema (20.8%), hypercholesterolaemia/hypertriglyceridaemia (17.9%), anxiety (10.9%), thyroid disorders (9.1%), and diabetes (6.4%). In 2021, 78.6% of prevalent patients did not receive vitiligo-related treatments. The most prescribed vitiligo-related treatments were topical calcineurin inhibitors (13.9%) and topical corticosteroids (13.0%); 11.9% had a record of psychiatric medications. This study confirms the association between vitiligo and comorbidities (e.g., eczema, thyroid disorders) and high disease burden. The prevalence in Spain in 2021 (0.19%) was within the lower band of European estimates based on surveys/medical screenings. Most patients are not receiving vitiligo-related treatment and could benefit from new, effective treatments.

Burden of disease and treatment patterns in patients with vitiligo: findings from a national longitudinal retrospective study in the UK.

BACKGROUND: UK studies examining vitiligo burden and vitiligo-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence and prevalence of vitiligo, the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with vitiligo, vitiligo burden, HCRU, incidence of mental health comorbidities and management strategies, including treatment patterns. METHODS: This retrospective study used UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episode Statistics databases to analyse patients with vitiligo from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2021. RESULTS: Among 17 239 incident patients, mean incidence of vitiligo was 0.16 (2010-2021) per 1000 person-years [PY; range 0.10 (2020-COVID-19) to 0.19 (2010/2013/2018)]; among 66 217 prevalent patients, prevalence increased from 0.21% (2010) to 0.38% (2021). The most common comorbidities recorded after vitiligo diagnosis were diabetes (19.4%), eczema (8.9%), thyroid disease (7.5%) and rheumatoid arthritis (6.9%). Mental health diagnoses recorded at any time included depression and/or anxiety (24.6%), depression (18.5%), anxiety (16.0%) and sleep disturbance (12.7%), and recorded after vitiligo diagnosis in 6.4%, 4.4%, 5.5% and 3.9%, respectively. Mental health comorbidities were more common in White (e.g. depression and/or anxiety 29.0%) than in Black (18.8%) and Asian (16.1%) patients. In adolescents, depression and/or anxiety was most commonly diagnosed after a vitiligo diagnosis than before (7.4% vs. 1.8%). Healthcare resources were used most frequently in the first year after vitiligo diagnosis (incident cohort), typically dermatology-related outpatient appointments (101.9/100 PY) and general practitioner consultations (97.9/100 PY). In the year after diagnosis, 60.8% of incident patients did not receive vitiligo-related treatment (i.e. topical corticosteroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors, oral corticosteroids or phototherapy), increasing to 82.0% the next year; median time from diagnosis to first treatment was 34.0 months (95% confidence interval 31.6-36.4). Antidepressants and/or anxiolytics were recorded for 16.7% of incident patients in the year after diagnosis. In 2019, 85.0% of prevalent patients did not receive vitiligo-related treatments. CONCLUSION: Most patients were not on vitiligo-related treatments within a year of diagnosis, with the time to first treatment exceeding 2 years, suggesting that vitiligo may be dismissed as unimportant. New effective treatments, early initiation and psychological intervention and support are needed to reduce the vitiligo burden on patients.

Vitiligo is a chronic disease in which cells that produce the skin pigment called melanin are attacked, resulting in white or pale patches of skin. It is diagnosed in an estimated 0.2­0.8% of people in Europe. This study aimed to describe how many new cases of vitiligo were recorded between 2010 and 2021 in the UK and the overall percentage of people with vitiligo. Linked national general practitioner (GP) and hospital-based records containing information on medical diagnoses, admissions and hospital visits were used. Records of other diseases and conditions, including mental health conditions, in combination with healthcare service use and treatment prescribed to patients with vitiligo, were studied to describe the impact of living with vitiligo. It was found that 0.16 new cases of vitiligo were recorded per 1000 person-years (for example, 0.16 new cases would have been recorded if 1000 people were followed for 1 year or if 100 people were all followed for 10 years) between 2010 and 2021. In 2021, 0.4% of the population studied had vitiligo. In the 5 years after a new diagnosis of vitiligo, the most common other diseases recorded were diabetes (19%), eczema (9%), thyroid disease (8%) and rheumatoid arthritis (7%), and the most common mental health conditions were depression and/or anxiety (25%). In the year after diagnosis, GP and dermatology outpatient visits were the most common type of medical services used. In 2019, 85% of all individuals with vitiligo were not receiving any vitiligo-related treatment (such as creams or phototherapy). It took approximately 34 months from diagnosis of vitiligo to the start of first treatment. The results suggest that new effective treatments and psychological interventions are needed to reduce the burden of vitiligo.

Vitiligo patient population and disease burden in France: VIOLIN study results from the CONSTANCES cohort.

BACKGROUND: Vitiligo is a chronic autoimmune disease resulting in skin depigmentation. OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the prevalence, disease burden and treatment of vitiligo in France. METHODS: VIOLIN was a cross-sectional study nested in the national CONSTANCES cohort, which consists of randomly selected adults aged 18-69 years in France. In VIOLIN, longitudinal data were collected prospectively from 158,898 participants during 2012-2018 and linked to the National Health Data System (SNDS), a healthcare utilization database. Patients with physician-diagnosed vitiligo were matched (1:3) with control participants based on age, sex, geographic region, year of inclusion and skin phototype. Patients completed a questionnaire in 2022 to collect disease characteristics, disease burden and quality-of-life (QoL) data. RESULTS: Vitiligo prevalence was 0.71% (681/95,597) in 2018. The mean age in the vitiligo population was 51.2 years; 51.4% were women. Most patients (63%) were diagnosed before age 30 years, mainly by dermatologists (83.5%). Most patients (81.1%) had visible lesions (i.e. on face, hands). Vitiligo was limited to <10% of the body surface area (BSA) in 85.8% of patients. Comorbidities including thyroid disease (18.0% vs. 9.0%), psoriasis (13.7% vs. 9.7%), atopic dermatitis (12.4% vs. 10.3%), depression (18.2% vs. 14.6%) and alopecia areata (4.3% vs. 2.4%) were significantly more common in patients with vitiligo versus matched controls (n = 2043). QoL was significantly impaired in patients with >5% BSA involvement or visible lesions, particularly with ≥10% facial involvement. Vitiligo-specific instruments (i.e. Vitiligo Impact Patient scale and Vitiligo-specific QoL instrument) were more sensitive to QoL differences among subgroups versus general skin instruments, and generic instruments were least sensitive. Most patients (83.8%) did not receive any prescribed treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with vitiligo in France have a high disease burden, particularly those with visible lesions or higher BSA involvement. Most patients are not receiving treatment, highlighting the need for new effective treatments and patient/physician education.