Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Med ; 13(9)2024 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38731208

ABSTRACT

Background/Objectives: There is currently no guidance on how to interpret the global degrees of activity (worsening) and repigmentation (improvement) in vitiligo. Stratification into global degrees can be completed for static evaluations (e.g., visible disease activity signs) and dynamic assessments (e.g., evolution over time). For the latter, the Vitiligo Disease Activity Score (VDAS15&60) and Vitiligo Disease Improvement Score (VDIS15&60) were recently validated. Methods: In the current study, a Physician Global Assessment (PGA) for disease activity (worsening) and repigmentation (improvement) was evaluated for validity (construct) and reliability (inter- and intrarater) based on a photo set of 66 patients. Subsequently, the PGA activity (worsening) and repigmentation (improvement) were used to stratify the Vitiligo Extent Score plus (VESplus), VDAS15&60 or VDIS15&60 into three global categories (slightly, moderately and much worse/improved), based on ROC analysis. Results: For the VESplus, cut-off values for the categories 'slightly, moderately and much worse' were >0.3%, >27.71% and >128.75% BSA (relative changes in the affected total BSA), respectively. For the categories 'slightly, moderately and much improved', they were >0%, >4.87% and >36.88% BSA (relative changes in the affected total BSA), respectively. The optimal cut-off values of the number of active (VDAS15) body areas were >0 areas for slightly worse, >2 areas for moderately worse and >7 for much worse. For VDIS15, the cut-off values for slightly improved and moderately improved were >0 and >1. For VDAS60 and VDIS60, the cut-off points were >0.5, >3, >9.5 and >0.5 and >1.5, respectively. The results should be interpreted with caution in patients with extensive vitiligo due to the rather limited disease extent of the included patient population (VESplus (median: 3.2%)). Conclusions: This research will aid in the development of more detailed international definitions.

2.
Exp Dermatol ; 33(1): e14975, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37975576

ABSTRACT

There is evidence of a link between disease activity in vitiligo and clinical visible signs such as confetti-like depigmentation, Koebner phenomenon and hypochromic areas/borders. Despite its established value, dermatologists and researchers continue to have a limited understanding of the vitiligo disease activity signs. The primary goal of this study was to identify 'hot spots' of disease activity signs in vitiligo patients in order to improve detection in clinical practice. Furthermore, the prevalence, clinical profiles of predisposed patients, interrelationship between the disease activity signs and potential pitfalls in the recognition of the signs were evaluated. The Vitiligo Signs of Activity Score (VSAS) was used to score the presence of the disease activity signs in 441 non-segmental and 57 segmental vitiligo patients. More detailed predilection areas were scored in a subset of patients, using 65 predefined body locations. At least one disease activity sign was observed in 51.0% and 8.8% of the non-segmental and segmental vitiligo patients, respectively. Confetti-like depigmentation was most observed on the elbows, Koebner phenomenon on the back of the hands, and hypochromic areas/borders in the armpits. The three signs were significantly more observed in patients with more involved body locations. Moreover, hypochromic areas/borders were more common in younger patients. Confetti-like depigmentation had the highest interrelationship with the other signs and was the easiest to recognise. Knowledge around hot spots of the disease activity signs will enhance and simplify their detection in clinical practice. Based on the results, confetti-like depigmentation appears to be the most straightforward sign to evaluate.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis , Hypopigmentation , Vitiligo , Humans , Vitiligo/diagnosis , Hand
3.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 37(11): 2231-2242, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37602494

ABSTRACT

Clinician-reported outcome measures (ClinROMs) are essential for assessment of vitiligo in clinical trials and daily practice. Several instruments have been developed and tested to measure, for example, vitiligo extent, repigmentation and activity. The goal of this review was to identify all introductory publications of ClinROMs for vitiligo that include at least some aspects of validation and to describe the instruments' characteristics, intention for use and practical strengths and limitations. A search strategy was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) from inception to July 2022. Based on the literature search (n = 2860), 10 articles were identified, describing 14 different ClinROMs. Six ClinRoms measured disease extent and/or repigmentation, seven evaluated disease activity and one was a composite score. The Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI), and Vitiligo Extent Score (VES and VESplus) measure overall disease extent and/or repigmentation. The VASI relies on hand units (1% body surface area), whereas the VES and VESplus use a picture-based scoring technique. The Vitiligo Extent Score for a Target Area (VESTA) measures repigmentation percentage for target lesions. One global assessment score for extent has been validated. Vitiligo disease activity scores included a static measure of clinical activity signs (Vitiligo Signs of Activity Score [VSAS]) and two measures assessing dynamic evolution (Vitiligo Disease Activity Score [VDAS] and Vitiligo Disease Improvement Score [VDIS]). The Vitiligo European Task Force assessment tool (VETFa) is a composite score. Depending on the practical strengths and limitations as well as the research question and setting (clinical trials vs. daily practice), the choice of an appropriate ClinROM may differ. Fourteen ClinROMs in vitiligo were identified to measure vitiligo extent, repigmentation, and activity. Further research evaluating the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of each instrument and worldwide consensus on which instrument to use for a specific outcome (domain) is greatly needed.


Subject(s)
Erythema Multiforme , Vitiligo , Humans , Vitiligo/therapy , Vitiligo/drug therapy , Reproducibility of Results , Research Design , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...