[Organ transplantation during SARS-CoV-2 epidemic : the 2020-2021 Liege transplant Center experience]. / Face à la COVID-19. La transplantation d'organes en période de pandémie SARS-CoV-2 : l'expérience 2020-2021 du Centre liégeois de Transplantation.

The «Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2¼ (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has disrupted medical care and intra-hospital organization during 2020, both in Belgium and throughout the world. Solid organ transplantation was not spared and in Belgium, the number of organ donors and transplants overall decreased by 20 % for livers and by 33 % for hearts between 2019 and 2020. The aim of this article is to summarize the experience acquired in 2020 and 2021 on the organizational and medical implications of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with regard to the care of patients transplanted or awaiting for organ transplants, and to draw conclusions both for the aftermath of COVID-19 but also for future pandemics. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is highly recommended and particularly important in organ transplant recipients, even if the response rate is lower than in the non-transplanted population. A third injection is now advised in immunosuppressed patients.

La pandémie de «Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2¼ (SARS-CoV-2) a bouleversé les soins médicaux et l'organisation intra-hospitalière durant l'année 2020 en Belgique et dans le monde. La transplantation d'organes ne fut pas épargnée. En Belgique, le nombre de donneurs d'organes et de transplantations a globalement diminué de 20 % pour les foies et de 33 % pour les cœurs entre 2019 et 2020. Le but de cet article est de résumer l'expérience acquise en 2020 et 2021 sur les implications organisationnelles et médicales de la pandémie de «coronavirus disease 2019¼ (COVID-19) quant à la prise en charge des patients transplantés ou en attente de greffe d'organes, et d'en tirer les conclusions à la fois pour les suites de la COVID-19, mais aussi pour les éventuelles futures pandémies. La vaccination anti-SARS-CoV-2 est recommandée et particulièrement importante chez les patients transplantés d'organe, même si le taux de réponse est inférieur à la population non transplantée. Une troisième injection est conseillée chez les patients immunodéprimés.

Liver transplantation during the COVID-19 epidemic : recommendations from the Belgian Liver Intestine Transplant Committee (BeLIAC).

Since January 2020, the Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has dramatically impacted the world. In March 2020, the COVID-19 epidemic reached Belgium creating uncertainty towards all aspects of life. There has been an impressive capacity and solidarity of all healthcare professionals to acutely reconvert facilities to treat these patients. In the context of liver transplantation (LTx), concerns are raised about organ donation shortage and safety, the ethics of using limited healthcare resources for LTx, selection criteria for LTx during the epidemic and the risk of de novo COVID-19 infection on the waiting list and after LTx. BeLIAC makes several recommendations to try to mitigate the deleterious effect that this epidemic has/will have on donation and LTx, taking into account the available resources, and trying to maximize patients and healthcare professionals' safety.

A more than 20% increase in deceased-donor organ procurement and transplantation activity after the use of donation after circulatory death.

BACKGROUND: Organ procurement and transplant activity from controlled donation after circulatory death (DCD) was evaluated over an 11-year period to determine whether this program influenced the transplant and donation after brain death (DBD) activities. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Deceased donor (DD) procurement and transplant data were prospectively collected in a local database for retrospective review. RESULTS: There was an increasing trend in the potential and actual DCD numbers over time. DCD accounted for 21.9% of the DD pool over 11 years, representing 23.7% and 24.2% of the DD kidney and liver pool, respectively. The DBD retrieval and transplant activity increased during the same time period. Mean conversion rate turning potential into effective DCD donors was 47.3%. Mean DCD donor age was 54.6 years (range, 3-83). Donors ≥60 years old made up 44.1% of the DCD pool. Among referred donors, reasons for nondonation were medical contraindications (33.7%) and family refusals (19%). Mean organ yield per DCD donor was 2.3 organs. Mean total procurement warm ischemia time was 19.5 minutes (range, 6-39). In 2012, 17 DCD and 37 DBD procurements were performed in the Liege region, which has slightly >1 million inhabitants. CONCLUSIONS: This DCD program implementation enlarged the DD pool and did not compromise the development of DBD programs. The potential DCD pool might be underused and seems to be a valuable organ donor source.

End of life care in the operating room for non-heart-beating donors: organization at the University Hospital of Liège.

Non-heart-beating (NHB) organ donation has become an alternative source to increase organ supply for transplantation. A NHB donation program was implemented in our institution in 2002. As in many institutions the end of life care of the NHB donor (NHBD) is terminated in the operating room (OR) to reduce warm ischemia time. Herein we have described the organization of end of life care for these patients in our institution, including the problems addressed, the solution proposed, and the remaining issues. Emphasis is given to our protocol elaborated with the different contributors of the chain of the NHB donation program. This protocol specifies the information mandatory in the medical records, the end of life care procedure, the determination of death, and the issue of organ preservation measures before NHBD death. The persisting malaise associated with NHB donation reported by OR nurses is finally documented using an anonymous questionnaire.

Contribution of donors after cardiac death to the deceased donor pool: 2002 to 2009 University of Liege experience.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we have evaluated the organ procurement and transplantation activity from donors after cardiac death (DCD) at our institution over an 8-year period. Our aim was to determine whether this program influenced transplantation programs, or donation after brain death (DBD) activity. METHODS: We prospectively collected our procurement and transplantation statistics in a database for retrospective review. RESULTS: We observed an increasing trend in potential and actual DCD number. The mean conversion rate turning potential into effective donors was 58.1%. DCD accounted for 16.6% of the deceased donor (DD) pool over 8 years. The mean age for effective DCD donors was 53.9 years (range, 3-79). Among the effective donors, 63.3% (n = 31) came from the transplant center and 36.7% (n = 18) were referred from collaborative hospitals. All donors were Maastricht III category. The number of kidney and liver transplants using DCD sources tended to increase. DCD kidney transplants represented 10.8% of the DD kidney pool and DCD liver transplants made up 13.9% of the DD liver pool over 8 years. The DBD program activity increased in the same time period. In 2009, 17 DCD and 33 DBD procurements were performed in a region with a little >1 million inhabitants. CONCLUSION: The establishment of a DCD program in our institution enlarged the donor pool and did not compromise the development of the DBD program. In our experience, DCD are a valuable source for abdominal organ transplantation.

Fulminant hepatic failure induced by venlafaxine and trazodone therapy: a case report.

Although acute hepatitis may be a side effect of many medications, most cases are reversible after treatment interruption, and fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) is rare. Venlafaxine and trazodone are 2 popular antidepressant agents. Alteration of liver enzyme levels has been reported as a side effect of these drugs at normal doses. Herein we have reported the case of a 48-year-old woman without any previous history of liver disease, who developed fulminant liver failure after 4 months of venlafaxine and trazodone therapy. She required liver transplantation, a procedure that was successful with full patient recovery. The first 5 years of follow-up were uneventful. This case documented that venlafaxine and trazodone at normal doses can produce severe liver toxicity. Liver tests should be monitored regularly in patients who receive this therapy.

An 11-Year Overview of the Belgian Donor and Transplant Statistics Based on a Consecutive Yearly Data Follow-up and Comparing Two Periods: 1997 to 2005 Versus 2006 to 2007.

BACKGROUND: The Belgian Transplant Coordinators Section is responsible for the yearly data follow-up concerning donor and transplantation statistics in Belgium and presents herein a 10-year overview. METHODS: The procurement and transplant statistics were compared between 2 periods: Period 1 (P1, 1997-2005) versus Period 2 (P2, 2006-2007). RESULTS: The kidney and liver waiting lists (P1 vs P2) showed an overall decrease for a period of 2 consecutive years in P2; kidney (-170 patients; -18%), and liver (-83 patients; -34%). All other waiting lists (heart, lung, pancreas) remained stable. Mean ED further increased (P1 vs P2); 229 (P1) versus 280 (P2, +22.27%). Non-heart-beating donors were significantly (+288%) more often procured in P2. Mean donor age was 37.9 +/- 17.8 years (P1) versus 46.5 +/- 19.9 years (P2), and mean organ yield per donor was 3.48 +/- 1.7 (P1) versus 3.38 +/- 1.8 (P2). Overall transplant activity per million inhabitants increased 21.1%. CONCLUSION: For 2 consecutive years, the Belgian statistics showed significantly increased donor activity with an impact on waiting list dynamics and transplantation. The mean organ yield per donor was not influenced despite an increased average age and change in reason for death.

Liver transplant donation after cardiac death: experience at the University of Liege.

OBJECTIVE: Donation after cardiac death (DCD) has been proposed to overcome in part the organ donor shortage. In liver transplantation, the additional warm ischemia time associated with DCD procurement may promote higher rates of primary nonfunction and ischemic biliary lesions. We reviewed the results of liver transplantation from DCD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2003 to 2007, we consecutively performed 13 controlled DCD liver transplantations. The medical records of all donors and recipients were retrospectively reviewed, evaluating in particular the outcome and occurrence of biliary complications. Mean follow-up was 25 months. RESULTS: Mean donor age was 51 years, and mean intensive care unit stay was 5.4 days. Mean time between ventilation arrest and cardiac arrest was 9.3 minutes. Mean time between cardiac arrest and arterial flushing was 7.7 minutes. No-touch period was 2 to 5 minutes. Mean graft cold ischemia time was 295 minutes, and mean suture warm ischemia time was 38 minutes. Postoperatively, there was no primary nonfunction. Mean peak transaminase level was 2546 UI/mL. Patient and graft survival was 100% at 1 year. Two of 13 patients (15%) developed main bile duct stenosis and underwent endoscopic management of the graft. No patient developed symptomatic intrahepatic bile duct strictures or needed a second transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience confirms that controlled DCD donors may be a valuable source of transplantable liver grafts in cases of short warm ischemia at procurement and minimal cold ischemia time.

Organ procurement after euthanasia: Belgian experience.

Euthanasia was legalized in Belgium in 2002 for adults under strict conditions. The patient must be in a medically futile condition and of constant and unbearable physical or mental suffering that cannot be alleviated, resulting from a serious and incurable disorder caused by illness or accident. Between 2005 and 2007, 4 patients (3 in Antwerp and 1 in Liège) expressed their will for organ donation after their request for euthanasia was granted. Patients were aged 43 to 50 years and had a debilitating neurologic disease, either after severe cerebrovascular accident or primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Ethical boards requested complete written scenario with informed consent of donor and relatives, clear separation between euthanasia and organ procurement procedure, and all procedures to be performed by senior staff members and nursing staff on a voluntary basis. The euthanasia procedure was performed by three independent physicians in the operating room. After clinical diagnosis of cardiac death, organ procurement was performed by femoral vessel cannulation or quick laparotomy. In 2 patients, the liver, both kidneys, and pancreatic islets (one case) were procured and transplanted; in the other 2 patients, there was additional lung procurement and transplantation. Transplant centers were informed of the nature of the case and the elements of organ procurement. There was primary function of all organs. The involved physicians and transplant teams had the well-discussed opinion that this strong request for organ donation after euthanasia could not be waived. A clear separation between the euthanasia request, the euthanasia procedure, and the organ procurement procedure is necessary.

Overview of the Belgian donor and transplant statistics 2006: results of consecutive yearly data follow-up by the Belgian Section of Transplant Coordinators.

BACKGROUND: The Belgian Section of Transplant Coordinators, created in 1997 under the auspices of the Belgian Transplant Society, is in charge of the collection of the national data about donor/procurement activities. METHODS: Data are collected in all Belgian transplant centers. An annual report is finalized by combining these data with data from the Eurotransplant database. RESULTS: An increase of both potential donors (n = 501, +14.4%) and effective donors (n = 273, +16.7%) was observed in 2006 versus 2005. Among effective donors, 28 were non-heart-beating donors (10.25%). Overall donor ratio was 26.26 donors per million inhabitants. Within potential donors, absence of organ harvesting was due to medical contraindications (28%), family refusal (13%), or legal refusal (2%). Donor mean age was 46.4 years and mean organs/donor was 3.21 +/- 1.7. An overall reduction of Belgian waiting lists was observed in 2006 as compared with 2005 (-5.7% for kidney, -25.7% for liver, -9.4% for heart, -6.7% for lung, and -11.7% for pancreas), while waiting list mortality was 18% for liver, 11% for heart, and 7% for lung. As compared with 2005, transplant activities increased for kidney (n = 485, +24.3%), heart +/- lungs (n = 73, +7.3%), and lungs (n = 83, +39.4%) but decreased for liver (n = 236, -2.1%). Living donation represented 8.45% for kidney (+28.1% vs 2005) and 8% for liver transplantation (-29.6%). CONCLUSION: Globally, a marked increase of procurement and transplant activities was observed in 2006, allowing to limit waiting list and waiting list mortality. Further increase of living donor activity and non-heart-beating donation remains necessary to extend the donor pool.

Avoiding blood products during liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation is a major surgical procedure usually requiring large amount of blood products (red cells, platelets, fresh-frozen plasma). We developed a multidisciplinary transfusion-free protocol for liver transplantation in Jehovah's witnesses who refuse the use of blood products but accept organ transplantation. Between September 1998 and November 2004, 9 of 29 Jehovah's witnesses evaluated for liver transplantation were transplanted after medical preparation. None of these patients received any blood product during the surgical procedure. This experience may be beneficial for the entire liver transplantation population, as excessive transfusion has been linked to increased morbidity and mortality in liver transplantation.

Organ donors with primary central nervous system tumor.

Patients with primary central nervous system (CNS) tumor have been accepted for organ donation because these tumors very rarely spread outside the CNS. However several case reports of CNS tumor transferral with organ transplantation recently challenged this attitude. Some risk factors for extraneural spread of CNS tumors have been determined, but the absence of risk factors does not exclude the possibility of metastases. To our knowledge, 13 cases of CNS tumor transferral with organ transplantation (one heart, three livers, eight kidneys, one kidney/pancreas) have been reported in the literature. Even if no prospective evaluation of the CNS tumor transmission risk with transplantation has been undergone, this risk may be estimated between a little more than 0% and 3% from retrospective series. The authors consider that patients with CNS tumor should be accepted as donors as long as the risk of dying on the waiting lists is significantly higher than the tumor transferral risk. Therefore the authors would have no restriction for transplanting organs from donors with benign or low-grade CNS tumor. For high-grade tumors, the authors would consider these donors as "marginal donors," and balance the risk of tumor transmission with the medical condition of the recipient.

Cardiac transplantation in patients older than 55 years.

From 1985 to 1990, 27 patients older than 55 years (extremes 55-65 years; 21 men and 6 women) received a cardiac transplant. The cause of cardiopathy was ischemic in 70%. Postoperative immunosuppressive therapy consisted of Cyclosporin A, steroids, azathioprine and antilymphocytic serum. Rejection episodes were monitored by endomyocardial biopsies and treated by pulses of steroids or monoclonal antibodies (OKT3). The operative mortality is 7.4% (n = 2). The one and two year survivals are 71% and 62% respectively. The incidence of infection and/or rejection were 0.71 +/- 0.4 and 1.4 +/- 0.7 episodes/patient year. Age beyond 55 years does not contraindicate heart transplantation. This change in recipient selection policy should lead to parallel changes in donor selection criteria.

Cardiac transplantation beyond 55 years of age.

Between January 1985 and December 1988, 20 patients over the age of 55 years (extremes 56-63 years; 15 men and 5 women) underwent cardiac transplantation. The cause of cardiopathy was ischemic in 70% of the cases. The immunosuppressive regimen consisted of cyclosporin A, corticoids, and azathioprine. Rejection episodes were monitored by endomyocardial biopsies and treated by pulses of corticoids or monoclonal antibodies (OKT3). The operative mortality was 10% (n = 2). The 1-year survival rate was 70%. The 1-year incidence of infection and/or rejection episodes was 1 and 1.53 episodes/patient, respectively. One patient was successfully retransplanted after 9 months because of intractable rejection. Age beyond 55 years is no longer a contraindication to cardiac transplantation. This change in recipient selection policy should lead to parallel changes in donor selection criteria.