Successful heart transplantation from donation after euthanasia with distant procurement using normothermic regional perfusion and cold storage.

While euthanasia has been legalized in a growing number of countries, organ donation after euthanasia is only performed in Belgium, the Netherlands, Spain, and Canada. Moreover, the clinical practice of heart donation after euthanasia has never been reported before. We describe the first case of a heart donated after euthanasia, reconditioned with thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion, preserved using cold storage while being transported to a neighboring transplant center, and then successfully transplanted following a procurement warm ischemic time of 17 min. Heart donation after euthanasia using thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion is feasible, it could expand the heart donor pool and reduce waiting lists in countries where organ donation after euthanasia can be performed.

Infusion of Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stromal Cells After Liver Transplantation: A 5-Year Follow-Up.

Various properties of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) might be particularly of interest after liver transplantation (LT). In this article, we report the long-term results of a prospective, controlled, and first-in-human phase 1 study evaluating the safety of a single MSC infusion after LT. A total of 10 LT recipients treated with standard immunosuppression received 1.5 to 3 × 106 /kg third-party unrelated MSCs on postoperative day 3 and were prospectively compared with a control group of 10 LT recipients. Primary endpoints were set to prospectively detect potentially delayed adverse effects of MSC infusion, particularly the occurrence of infections and cancers. Secondary endpoints of liver graft and patient survival, graft rejection and function, occurrence of bile duct complications, and development of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSA) against liver or MSC donors were studied. The median follow-up was 85 months. There was no difference in overall rates of infection or cancer at 5 years of follow-up between the 2 groups. There was also no difference in secondary endpoints. The prevalence of de novo liver DSAs related to HLA mismatches was twice as high in the MSC group compared with the control group. All of the de novo class II HLA antibodies against MSCs were linked to a shared HLA mismatch between the liver and MSCs. This study confirms the safety of a single MSC infusion after LT. The potential benefits of MSC injections in the context of organ transplantation have yet to be demonstrated by larger prospective studies. The development of anti-HLA antibodies against an MSC donor should be further evaluated, especially in cases of shared HLA mismatches between graft and MSC donors, despite the fact that no deleterious effect has been detected.

Clinical course and challenging management of early COVID-19 infection after heart transplantation: case report of two patients.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in solid organ transplant patients, especially in heart transplant recipients, with only a few case reports and case series described so far. Heart transplant recipients may be at particular high risk due to their comorbidities and immunosuppressed state. CASE PRESENTATION: This report describes the clinical course and the challenging management of early COVID-19 infection in two heart transplant recipients who tested positive for the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the perioperative period of the transplant procedure. The two patients developed a severe form of the disease and ultimately died despite the initiation of an antiviral monotherapy with hydroxychloroquine coupled with the interruption of mycophenolate mofetil. CONCLUSIONS: These two cases illustrate the severity and poor prognosis of COVID-19 in the perioperative period of a heart transplant. Thorough screening of donors and recipients is mandatory, and the issue of asymptomatic carriers needs to be addressed.

First report of a successful pediatric heart transplantation from donation after circulatory death with distant procurement using normothermic regional perfusion and cold storage.

Heart transplantation (HT) from donation after circulatory death (DCD) is a promising alternative to expand the heart donor pool. Cold storage can be used in a strategy to successfully retrieve and transplant DCD hearts after reconditioning using normothermic regional perfusion for distant procurement. Herein, we present the first report of a pediatric DCD heart reconditioned with normothermic regional perfusion, preserved using only cold storage while being transported to a neighboring center, and then successfully transplanted after nearly 2 hours of cold static storage. If supported by an appropriate trial, this finding could obviate the need to use expensive perfusion devices for short interhospital distances for DCD heart transportation and stimulate more centers across the world to embrace DCD HT.

Successful clinical transplantation of hearts donated after circulatory death using normothermic regional perfusion.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplantation (HT) from donation after circulatory death (DCD) has yet to achieve wide clinical application despite the encouraging resultsreported recently. In this study we describe 2 cases of successful adult DCD HT performed at our institution using an original protocol. METHODS: Our local abdominal DCD protocol was updated to allow DCD heart procurement, and was accepted by the institutional ethics committee. The main features of the protocol include: pre-mortem insertion of peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulas; thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) by clamping the 3 aortic arch vessels to exclude cerebral circulation; and in-situ heart resuscitation. The retrieved hearts were directly transplanted into recipients located in an adjoining operating room. RESULTS: The procurement warm ischemic time was 25 minutes for the first donor, and 26 minutes for the second donor. The cold ischemic time was 16 minutes for the first recipient and 17 minutes for the second recipient. The suture time was 30 minutes for the first recipient, and 53 minutes for the second recipient. Both recipients were easily weaned off cardiopulmonary bypass in sinus rhythm and inotropic support. Post-operative evaluation of cardiac function was excellent and the patients were subsequently discharged home. CONCLUSIONS: Transplantation of hearts from DCD donors is now a clinical reality.NRP is a useful tool for resuscitation, reperfusion, and preservation of transplanted hearts. It also offers the opportunity to assess the function and viability of organs before transplantation. However,due to ethical issues, some may object to ante-mortem intervention.

Infusion of third-party mesenchymal stromal cells after kidney transplantation: a phase I-II, open-label, clinical study.

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) exhibit anti-inflammatory and immune-regulatory properties, and preclinical studies suggest a potential benefit in solid organ transplantation. We report on the 1-year follow-up of an open-label phase I-II trial of a single infusion of third-party MSC post-kidney transplantation, in addition to standard immunosuppression. Ten kidney transplant recipients from deceased donors received third-party bone marrow MSCs (∼2 × 106/kg) on day 3 ± 2 post-transplant and were compared to 10 concurrent controls. No adverse effects were noted at MSC injection. One participant with a history of cardiac disease had a non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction approximately 3 hours after MSC infusion. Incidences of opportunistic infections and acute rejection were similar. At day 7 post-transplant, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in MSC-treated recipients reached 48.6 ml/min/1.73m2, compared to 32.5 ml/min/1.73m2 in controls and 29.3 ml/min/1.73m2 in our overall cohort of kidney transplant recipients. No difference in eGFR was found at 1 year. MSC-treated recipients showed increased frequencies of regulatory T cells at day 30, with no significant change in B cell frequencies compared to concurrent controls. Four MSC-treated participants developed antibodies against MSC or shared kidney-MSC HLA, with only 1 with MFI >1500. A single infusion of third-party MSC following kidney transplantation appears to be safe, with one cardiac event of unclear relationship to the intervention. MSC therapy is associated with increased regulatory T cell proportion and with improved early allograft function. Long-term effects, including potential immunization against MSC, remain to be studied.

Infusion of mesenchymal stromal cells after deceased liver transplantation: A phase I-II, open-label, clinical study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) infusion could be a means to establish tolerance in solid organ recipients. The aim of this prospective, controlled, phase I study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and tolerability of a single infusion of MSCs in liver transplant recipients. METHODS: Ten liver transplant recipients under standard immunosuppression received 1.5-3×106/kg third-party unrelated MSCs on postoperative day 3±2, and were prospectively compared to a control group of ten liver transplant recipients. As primary endpoints, MSC infusion toxicity was evaluated, and infectious and cancerous complications were prospectively recorded until month 12 in both groups. As secondary endpoints, rejection rate, month-6 graft biopsies, and peripheral blood lymphocyte phenotyping were compared. Progressive immunosuppression weaning was attempted from month 6 to 12 in MSC recipients. RESULTS: No variation in vital parameters or cytokine release syndrome could be detected during and after MSC infusion. No patient developed impairment of organ functions (including liver graft function) following MSC infusion. No increased rate of opportunistic infection or de novo cancer was detected. As secondary endpoints, there was no difference in overall rates of rejection or graft survival. Month-6 biopsies did not demonstrate a difference between groups in the evaluation of rejection according to the Banff criteria, in the fibrosis score or in immunohistochemistry (including Tregs). No difference in peripheral blood lymphocyte typing could be detected. The immunosuppression weaning in MSC recipients was not successful. CONCLUSIONS: No side effect of MSC infusion at day 3 after liver transplant could be detected, but this infusion did not promote tolerance. This study opens the way for further MSC or Treg-based trials in liver transplant recipients. LAY SUMMARY: Therapy with mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) has been proposed as a means to improve results of solid organ transplantation. One of the potential MSC role could be to induce tolerance after liver transplantation, i.e. allowing the cessation of several medications with severe side effects. This study is the first-in-man use of MSC therapy in ten liver transplant recipients. This study did not show toxicity after a single MSC infusion but it was not sufficient to allow withdrawal of immunosuppression. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Eudract: # 2011-001822-81, ClinicalTrials.gov: # NCT 01429038.

Does comfort therapy during controlled donation after circulatory death shorten the life of potential donors?

INTRODUCTION: Controlled donation after circulatory death (DCD) remains ethically controversial. The authors developed a controlled DCD protocol in which comfort therapy is regularly used. The aim of this study was to determine whether this policy shortens the DCD donors' life. METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data on patients proposed for DCD at the University Hospital of Liege, Belgium, over a 56-month period. The survival duration of these patients, defined as duration between the time of proposal for DCD and the time of circulatory arrest, was compared between patients who actually donated organs and those who did not. RESULTS: About 128 patients were considered for controlled DCD and 54 (43%) became donors. Among the 74 non-donor patients, 34 (46%) objected to organ donation, 38 patients (51%) were denied by the transplant team for various medical reasons, and two potential DCD donors did not undergo procurement due to logistical and organizational reasons. The survival durations were similar in the DCD donor and non-donor groups. No non-donor patient survived. CONCLUSIONS: Survival of DCD donors is not shortened when compared with non-donor patients. These data support the ethical and respectful approach to potential DCD donors in the authors' center, including regular comfort therapy.

Cadaveric liver transplantation for non-acetaminophen fulminant hepatic failure: a 20-year experience.

AIM: To investigate the long-term results of liver transplantation (LT) for non-acetaminophen fulminant hepatic failure (FHF). METHODS: Over a 20-year period, 29 FHF patients underwent cadaveric whole LT. Most frequent causes of FHF were hepatitis B virus and drug-related (not acetaminophen) liver failure. All surviving patients were regularly controlled at the out-patient clinic and none was lost to follow-up. Mean follow-up was 101 mo. RESULTS: One month, one-, five- and ten-year patient survival was 79%, 72%, 68% and 68%, respectively. One month, one-, five- and ten-year graft survival was 69%, 65%, 51% and 38%, respectively. Six patients needed early (< 2 mo) retransplantation, four for primary non-function, one for early acute refractory rejection because of ABO blood group incompatibility, and one for a malignant tumor found in the donor. Two patients with hepatitis B FHF developed cerebral lesions peri-transplantion: One developed irreversible and extensive brain damage leading to death, and one suffered from deep deficits leading to continuous medical care in a specialized institution. CONCLUSION: Long-term outcome of patients transplanted for non-acetaminophen FHF may be excellent. As the quality of life of these patients is also particularly good, LT for FHF is clearly justified, despite lower graft survival compared with LT for other liver diseases.