Association of vitamin B12 with obesity, overweight, insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome, and body fat composition; primary care-based study.

AIM: To investigate correlation of vitamin B12 with obesity insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome. METHODS: The cross-sectional and primary care-based study was carried out. Anthropometric, blood pressure measurements and bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) were recorded. Vitamin B12, folic acid, hemogram, insulin, ferritin, iron, total iron binding capacity and other biochemical tests were assayed. The subjects were grouped as obesity, overweight, control, metabolic syndrome (MetS) and insulin resistance (IR). Correlation of vitamin B12 with body mass index (BMI), IR, age, and BIA was evaluated. RESULTS: The study enrolled 976 patients (obesity: 414, overweight: 212, and control: 351). The mean age in groups of obesity, overweight and control were 35.9 ± 8.7, 28.9 ± 6.3 and 33.1 ± 8.7, respectively (p = 0.142). Vitamin B12 level was significantly lower in patients with obesity and overweight than healthy individuals (178.9 ± 25.2; 219.8 ± 78.5, and 328.5 ± 120.5, p less than 0.001, respectively). Vitamin B12 level was lower in patients with MetS (+/-) and IR (+/-), but insignificant (p = 0.075 and 0.058, respectively). Significant and negative correlation was observed between vitamin B12 and BMI (r =-0.221, p=0.001). No significant difference was observed between obese male and female patients (247.8 ± 89.1 versus 235.5 ± 89.3 pg/mL, respectively, p=0.090). CONCLUSION: Low Vitamin B12 level was associated with obesity and overweight, but not with insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome and gender. Vitamin B12 was negatively correlated only with body mass index.

Effectiveness for self-monitoring of blood sugar on blood glucose control in Turkish patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIM: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic disease requiring continuous monitoring and treatment. Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is frequently recommended. The purpose of the study was to evaluate effectiveness of SMBG on metabolic control in Turkish patients with type 2 DM. METHODS: The cross-sectional study enrolled type 2 diabetic patients without insulin regimen. The participants were assigned to three groups according to status of SMBG: group 1- regular, group 2 - irregular and group 3 - never SMBG implementation. RESULTS: A total of 349 patients were enrolled. There was no significant difference in mean fasting and post-prandial blood glucose, lipid profile values between the groups. The number of patients with high education level in group 1 was higher than groups 2 and 3 (p = 0.001). HbA1c level was higher in groups 2 and 3 than group 1, but not significantly (p = 0.285). Mean spot urinary albumin- creatinine ratio (ACR) in group 1 is significantly lower than in groups 2 and 3 (p = 0.008 and p = 0.044, respectively), but no significant difference was observed between group 2 and 3 (p = 0.473). CONCLUSION: The study indicated that regular use of SMBG was not superior to irregular/never use of SMBG on glycemic control, but it seemed to be good intervention for prevention of diabetic nephropathy. We suggestively offered that SMBG should be recommended for patients with a high education level to meet the goal of its use, and it should be incorporated into self-management with effective educational intervention.