ABSTRACT
UNLABELLED: From the AF, the smaller risk is controversial. The influence of the general and environmental components on IR is not know in a satisfactory way. OBJECTIVES: The influence of AF on the prevail IR in two rural communities of Córdoba with different fenotipical configuration and IR risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Transverse study (survey, clinical and biochemical checkup) over 1143 people of Oncativo community (ON) and Dean Funes (DF), inclusion: n = 673 (30-60 years old) Normal ECG, no diabetics. Sorts AF according to the spend of calories (Kcal/sem): a) sedentary (< 500), b) low (5001-1000), c) regular (1001-2500), and d) High (> 2500). IR is HOMA > 2.5; where [HOMA = (Glucemia * Insulina)/ 4.5]. RESULTS: AF: 31.4% sedentary, 20.2% low, 26.3% regular and 22.1% high. 16.5% IR in ON opposite 34.8% en DF (P < 0.001), IR in ON 8.2% with AF high opposite 18.8% the rest (P = 0.032), 36.8% and 34.2% like in DF (P = 0.67). With the adjusted results for age and community it was found less IMC (P = 0.002) and waist circumference (P = 0.042) than the most category of AF. The blood pressure had not a meaningful change, lipid profile or HOMA depending of AF. CONCLUSION: if a benefit of AF over IR exists, it will be conditioned for genetics and environmental primaries determiners.
Subject(s)
Adaptation, Physiological/physiology , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Exercise/physiology , Insulin Resistance , Rural Population , Adult , Argentina/epidemiology , Body Composition/physiology , Body Mass Index , Epidemiologic Methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/metabolismABSTRACT
From the AF, the smaller risk is controversial. The influence of the general and environmental components on IR is not know in a satisfactory way. OBJECTIVES: The influence of AF on the prevail IR in two rural communities of Córdoba with different fenotipical configuration and IR risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Transverse study (survey, clinical and biochemical checkup) over 1143 people of Oncativo community (ON) and Dean Funes (DF), inclusion: n = 673 (30-60 years old) Normal ECG, no diabetics. Sorts AF according to the spend of calories (Kcal/sem): a) sedentary (< 500), b) low (5001-1000), c) regular (1001-2500), and d) High (> 2500). IR is HOMA > 2.5; where [HOMA = (Glucemia * Insulina)/ 4.5]. RESULTS: AF: 31.4
sedentary, 20.2
low, 26.3
regular and 22.1
high. 16.5
IR in ON opposite 34.8
en DF (P < 0.001), IR in ON 8.2
with AF high opposite 18.8
the rest (P = 0.032), 36.8
and 34.2
like in DF (P = 0.67). With the adjusted results for age and community it was found less IMC (P = 0.002) and waist circumference (P = 0.042) than the most category of AF. The blood pressure had not a meaningful change, lipid profile or HOMA depending of AF. CONCLUSION: if a benefit of AF over IR exists, it will be conditioned for genetics and environmental primaries determiners.
