ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Education and training may improve the prescription of pediatric parenteral nutrition. The aim was to evaluate the impact of an e-learning method on parenteral nutrition prescription skills among pediatric residents in 2 pediatric hospitals. METHODS: A randomized double-blind control study was conducted over a 9-month period among pediatric residents in HOSP1, Geneva, Switzerland, where physicians prescribe parenteral nutrition directly, and in HOSP2, Montreal, Canada, where physicians prescribe only occasionally because clinical pharmacists are devoted to this activity. The intervention consisted of an e-learning session about key issues of parenteral nutrition. Physician parenteral nutrition knowledge was evaluated with a standardized questionnaire based on clinical cases before and after the e-learning in the intervention groups; in the control groups, only the 2 tests were conducted. In HOSP1, participants also underwent iterative tests every 2 months to measure the retention of knowledge. RESULTS: Sixty-five physicians participated. Initial knowledge scores were higher in HOSP1 (pretest scores 180 ± 29 vs 133 ± 24, p < 0.001). Overall, there was no significant difference in the impact of the e-learning intervention between the control and e-learning groups (p > 0.05). A significant knowledge improvement was observed in HOSP2 in the e-learning group (p = 0.033). Iterative tests in HOSP1 showed persistence of knowledge without significant differences between the groups. E-learning satisfaction among the participants was outstanding (100%). CONCLUSION: E-learning seems to be an effective method for teaching parenteral nutrition among pediatric residents and fellows at the beginning of the training. High satisfaction with this teaching method was observed in this study.
Subject(s)
Computer-Assisted Instruction , Parenteral Nutrition , Canada , Child , Double-Blind Method , Hospitals, University , Humans , Pilot ProjectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work was to compare two generic questionnaires assessing patients' satisfaction with medication. In addition we tested whether satisfaction can predict adherence to medication regimens in patients with chronic diseases, and which dimensions of satisfaction are most involved. METHODS: This prospective, observational study was conducted over one year in a heterogeneous population of patients with various chronic diseases. Satisfaction with medication was assessed by using the TSQM® vII and the SatMed-Q® questionnaires, and adherence to treatment was assessed with the Morisky-Green questionnaire. Clinical pharmacists interviewed patients to collect clinical, demographic and therapeutic data. RESULTS: 190 patients were enrolled. Both questionnaires showed excellent reliability and correlation was high (R=0.70; p<0.001). Adherence was correlated with satisfaction with medication whether assessed with the SatMed-Q® (R=0.23; p=0.002) or the TSQM® (R=0.17; p=0.02). Among different dimensions of satisfaction, convenience of use and side effects are prominent predictors of adherence. CONCLUSION: Adherence is related to the patient's satisfaction with medication whether assessed with the TSQM® vII or the SatMed-Q®. Therefore, these simple questionnaires could be used as predictive tools to identify patients whos' adherence needs to be improved.
