ABSTRACT
Correct and consistent condom use has been the primary method of HIV prevention until the FDA approve the use of PrEP in 2012. While strong evidence existing regarding the efficacy of PrEP, uptake has remained slower than anticipated. While work is underway to better understand the factors impacting uptake, the majority of this work as been focused on white gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) living in metropolitan regions of the coastal U.S. The current study used a community-based framework to assess perceived social norms through a elicitation survey. A total of 104 GBMSM met inclusion criteria for the study. Several analytic categories emerged across questions and a number of differences were found across race and ethnicity such as who would approve or disapprove off PrEP and who would be likely to use PrEP. Further, we found differences between injunctive and descriptive norms. These findings suggest that there are unique factors contributing to PrEP uptake among racial and ethnic minority GBMSM and that to fully understand uptake a more robust measure of perceived norms may be needed.
Subject(s)
Bisexuality/ethnology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Homosexuality, Male/ethnology , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis/methods , Sexual Behavior/ethnology , Social Norms/ethnology , Adult , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Bisexuality/psychology , HIV Infections/ethnology , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Homosexuality, Male/psychology , Humans , Male , Perception , Safe Sex , Sexual Behavior/psychology , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Surveys and Questionnaires , Texas/epidemiology , White People/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to understand how bear identity influenced condom use during the last anal sex event. Participants were recruited to complete an online, anonymous self-report survey through bear-related sexual and social networking websites. A total of 1,080 men who identified as gay or bisexual and as a member of the bear community and were 18 years or older completed the survey. Overall, fewer than a third of men reported condom use during the most recent receptive (28%) and insertive (30%) anal sex event. Men in bear concordant pairings were less likely to use a condom during receptive and insertive anal sex compared to those is discordant pairings (p < .05). Findings suggest that bear identity concordance influences condom use during anal sex after accounting for an individual's relationship to their most recent partner as well as other confounding variables.
