Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arch Bronconeumol ; 56(12): 784-791, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35373774

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Current evidence on the diagnostic yield and safety of pleural cryobiopsy (CB) is based on a series of heterogeneous studies with limited cohorts. A pooled analysis of these studies could improve the evidence and contribute to a better understanding of this new technique. METHODOLOGY: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies that included data on the yield and diagnostic safety of pleural CB compared with procedures performed using conventional flexible forceps. The heterogeneity of the analysis was evaluated by determining the I2 index, while study quality was measured with the QUADAS-2 tool. RESULTS: Seven studies involving 356 patients were used for the final evaluation. In 55.6%, the etiology of the pleural effusion was malignant, 61.1% of which were lung cancer. The diagnostic yield of pleural CB was 95% (95% CI 92-97) vs. 91% (95% CI 87-94) with conventional flexible forceps (P =  .019). Mild bleeding was reported in 67% of CB procedures (95% CI 62-72) compared with 85% of conventional flexible forceps procedures (95% CI 79-90) (P <  .001). CB specimens were larger, and fewer artifacts were detected. A pooled analysis of the detection of molecular changes could not be performed. Heterogeneity was moderate to high, although the quality of the studies was acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: Pleural CB is a safe technique with a high yield for etiological diagnosis of pleural effusion, and larger specimens with fewer artifacts are obtained. Molecular determinations should be investigated in more depth.

2.
Ann Thorac Med ; 10(3): 181-4, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26229560

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: For patients that are expected to survive for longer, the risk of complications combined with the need for more vacuum drainage bottles have become barriers to the placement of indwelling pleural catheter (IPC), since these could increase costs. OBJETIVES: The objective of the current article is to determine the cost and efficiency of treating malignant pleural effusion (MPE) with IPC in Spanish hospitals. METHODS: We compared the cost associated with the use of IPC per outpatient and per inpatient. We analyzed the number of consultations, length of hospital stay, and outcome of the procedure. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were recruited. Spontaneous pleurodesis was achieved in 34.4% of the cases. Post-catheterization complications were observed in 7.2%. Supplementary procedures were unnecessary and 87.7% of the patients reported improved dyspnea. In 64.9% of the cases, the IPCs were inserted during hospitalization with a median hospitalization time of 4 days (1-7.5). There were differences in the number of visits with more consultations being observed in the outpatient group. There was no difference in the number of vacuum drainage bottles used. The complications supposed a cost increase of €1045.6 per outpatient and €432.54 per inpatient. The overall average cost of treatment per outpatient was €3310.2 and €5450.3 per inpatient. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment with IPC was effective, safe, without need of any more procedures and led to improved dyspnea in more than 85% of the patients. The cost is lower in the outpatient group, although complications represent an increased cost in both groups.

3.
Surg Endosc ; 24(12): 3031-6, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20499106

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although the diagnostic validity and predictive factors for the diagnostic yield of transbronchial biopsy (TBB) of clearly defined pulmonary lesions with no visible endobronchial lesion have been analyzed in numerous studies, very few have used multivariate analysis techniques to evaluate the validity of TBB as a diagnostic tool or to analyze the independent influence of clearly dependent variables, such as the bronchus sign and lesion size. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all cases in which this type of lesion underwent TBB under fluoroscopic control between 2006 and 2008. The analyzed variables included lesion size, localization, the presence of the bronchus sign, and the final result obtained. We performed a descriptive analysis of the TBB results and a multivariate analysis of the predictive factors for the results using logistic regression techniques. RESULTS: A total of 273 patients (206 males, 75.5%) were included in the study. The average lesion diameter was 34 (± 16) mm, with 24% 2 cm or smaller. Twenty-eight percent of the lesions were localized in the lower lobes and 32% in the peripheral third of the lung. The bronchus sign was present in 28% of the patients. Seventy-eight percent of the patients had primary or metastatic malignant lung lesions, the rest were benign lesions of diverse etiology. TBB was diagnostic in 45.4% of cases. In the multivariate analysis, the only independent predictors of outcome were malignant etiology (OR = 4.8; 95% CI = 2.210.4), diameter >20 mm (OR = 3.6; 95% CI = 1.8-7.3), and the presence of the bronchus sign (OR = 2.4; 95% CI = 1.3-4.3). CONCLUSIONS: TBB of lesions clearly delimited without an endobronchial lesion can lead to diagnosis in almost half of the patients. The nature of the lesion, diameter >20 mm, and the presence of the bronchus sign are independent predictors of outcome.


Subject(s)
Bronchoscopy , Lung Diseases/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung/pathology , Aged , Biopsy/methods , Bronchi , Female , Humans , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...