Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Male Fertility: Should Fertility Preservation Options Be Considered before Treatment?

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a viable option for many cancer patients, including specific subgroups of pediatric patients. Despite their efficiency in treating different types of cancer, ICIs are responsible for a number of immune-related adverse events, including inflammatory toxicities, that can affect several organs. However, our knowledge of the impact of ICIs on the testis and male fertility is limited. It is possible that ICI treatment affects testicular function and spermatogenesis either directly or indirectly (or both). Treatment with ICIs may cause increased inflammation and immune cell infiltration within the seminiferous tubules of the testis, disturbing spermatogenesis or testosterone deficiency (primary hypogonadism). Additionally, the interference of ICIs with the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis may alter testosterone production, affecting testicular function (secondary hypogonadism) and spermatogenesis. This review provides an overview of the available evidence on the potential association between ICIs and the disruption of spermatogenesis, with special focus on ICIs targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). Moreover, it highlights the need for further investigations and encourages the discussion of associated risks and fertility-preservation considerations between clinicians and patients.

Empowering tomorrow's leaders: the impact of the 15th Network of Young Researchers in Andrology (NYRA) meeting on male reproductive health and interdisciplinary collaboration.

The 15th Network of Young Researchers in Andrology (NYRA) meeting, held at the Palace de Caux, Switzerland, served as a valuable platform to disseminate cutting-edge research and facilitate interactions among early-career researchers and trainees in andrology from around the world. Preceding the 22nd European Testis Workshop, the 2-day event brought together participants from a variety of countries to discuss a range of topics pertaining to men's reproductive health and biology. Specific focuses included piRNAs in mammalian reproduction, biomolecules enhancing sperm physiology, advances in in vitro spermatogenesis, reproductive strategies across species, and career development. A dedicated 'scientific speed-dating' social event also stood out, encouraging cross-disciplinary collaborations and strengthening ties within the scientific community. The high participation rate of the meeting highlighted its value in connecting the andrology community. Finally, the announcement of NYRA's merger with the European Academy of Andrology (EAA) marked a pivotal moment, enabling NYRA to support young researchers while collaborating with the EAA to advance andrology research. The 15th NYRA meeting played a crucial role in enhancing knowledge dissemination and andrology research, empowering young researchers, and addressing key challenges in male infertility.

Gonadal development and function after immature testicular tissue banking as part of high-risk gonadotoxic treatment.

BACKGROUND: Experimental fertility preservation programs have been started to safeguard the future fertility of prepubertal and pubertal males requiring high-risk gonadotoxic treatment protocols. However, long-term follow-up studies evaluating the effects on their gonadal development and function related to the testicular biopsy procedure are rather limited. DESIGN: This two-center follow-up study (between 2002 and 2020) evaluated the gonadal development and function of a cohort of 59 prepubertal and pubertal males who have been offered immature testicular tissue banking (TTB) prior to conventional high-risk chemo- and/or radiotherapy (HR-C/R) or conditioning therapy before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (CT-HSCT). The aim is to investigate the long-term impact of the testicular biopsy procedure and the high-risk gonadotoxic treatment. Testicular growth and the reproductive hormones luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone (T), and inhibin B (INHB) were analyzed after treatment completion, and compared between males accepting TTB and those refusing TTB (control) as well as between HR-C/R and CT-HSCT treatment protocols. RESULTS: Of the 59 prepubertal and pubertal males included, 25 were treated by HR-C/R and 34 required CT-HSCT. TTB was accepted for 39 males and refused for 20 males. Most patients were prepubertal at diagnosis (85%), at TTB (79%), and at treatment completion (76%), and pubertal or postpubertal at their last follow-up visit (66%). After 5.0 (1.0-13.0) years post treatment, most patients show normal testicular volumes (83%) and normal LH (89%), FSH (87%), T (87%), and INHB (79%) serum levels. The testicular biopsy procedure did not have an effect on testicular growth, LH, FSH, T, and INHB. Significantly more small postpubertal testicular volumes (p = .0278) and low INHB serum levels (p = .0130) were recorded after CT-HSCT, especially after myeloablative conditioning. CONCLUSION: The clinical follow-up data demonstrate no effect related to the biopsy procedure, but a substantial risk for impaired gonadal development after high-risk gonadotoxic treatment, in particular myeloablative CT-HSCT. Longer follow-up studies with a larger study population are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.

Testicular Tissue Banking for Fertility Preservation in Young Boys: Which Patients Should Be Included?

Due to the growing number of young patients at risk of germ cell loss, there is a need to preserve spermatogonial stem cells for patients who are not able to bank spermatozoa. Worldwide, more and more clinics are implementing testicular tissue (TT) banking programs, making it a novel, yet indispensable, discipline in the field of fertility preservation. Previously, TT cryopreservation was predominantly offered to young cancer patients before starting gonadotoxic chemo- or radiotherapy. Nowadays, most centers also bank TT from patients with non-malignant conditions who need gonadotoxic conditioning therapy prior to hematopoietic stem cell (HSCT) or bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Additionally, some centers include patients who suffer from genetic or developmental disorders associated with prepubertal germ cell loss or patients who already had a previous round of chemo- or radiotherapy. It is important to note that the surgical removal of TT is an invasive procedure. Moreover, TT cryopreservation is still considered experimental as restoration methods are not yet clinically available. For this reason, TT banking should preferably only be offered to patients who are at significant risk of becoming infertile. In our view, TT cryopreservation is recommended for young cancer patients in need of high-risk chemo- and/or radiotherapy, regardless of previous low-risk treatment. Likewise, TT banking is advised for patients with non-malignant disorders such as sickle cell disease, beta-thalassemia, and bone marrow failure, who need high-risk conditioning therapy before HSCT/BMT. TT retrieval during orchidopexy is also proposed for patients with bilateral cryptorchidism. Since patients with a medium- to low-risk treatment generally maintain their fertility, TT banking is not advised for this group. Also for Klinefelter patients, TT banking is not recommended as it does not give better outcomes than a testicular sperm extraction later in life.