Factors Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Infection Risk among Healthcare Workers of an Italian University Hospital.

We report the results of a study on the cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections in about 6000 workers of the University Hospital of Modena, Northern Italy, in the period March 2020-January 2021, and the relations with some individual and occupational factors. Overall, in healthcare workers (HCW) the cumulative incidence of COVID-19 during the period was 13.8%. Results confirm the role of overweight and obesity as significant risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Chronic respiratory diseases, including asthma, also proved to be significantly associated with the infection rate. Considering occupational factors, the COVID-19 risk was about threefold (OR: 2.7; 95% CI 1.7-4.5) greater in nurses and nurse aides than in non-HCW, and about double (OR: 1.9; 95% CI 1.2-3.2) in physicians. Interestingly, an association was also observed between infection risk and nightshifts at work (OR: 1.8; 95% CI 1.4-2.3), significantly related to the total number of shifts in the whole eleven-month period. Even if the vaccination campaign has now greatly modified the scenario of SARS-CoV-2 infections among HCW, the results of this study can be useful for further development of health and policy strategies to mitigate the occupational risk related to the new variants of coronavirus, and therefore the evolution of the pandemic.

Risk of cataract in health care workers exposed to ionizing radiation: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The eye is an important sensory organ occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation (IR) in healthcare workers (HCWs) engaged in medical imaging (MI). New evidence highlights the possible induction of cataract at IR exposure levels to be much lower than expected in the past. OBJECTIVE: Conduct an updated review on the current evidence on cataract risk in healthcare workers exposed to IR. METHODS: Published scientific studies on cataract risk in IR exposed healthcare workers were collected through a systematic search of two biomedical databases (MEDLINE and Scopus). Data from included studies was extracted and summarized. Study quality was also assessed. RESULTS: All 21 eligible studies reported an increased prevalence of cataract, especially posterior subcapsular cataract, in IR exposed  HCWs with a higher prevalence in interventional cardiology staff. DISCUSSION: Our review synthesizes the latest evidence to support the hypothesis of a significantly increased risk of occupational cataract in healthcare workers operating MI and exposed to IR, especially in interventional cardiologists. Data also support a dose-response relationship between IR exposure and the prevalence of opacities, especially posterior subcapsular opacities. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight the need for effective control measures including appropriate training, adherence to protective procedures, and a constant use of shields and eye personal protective equipment in healthcare workers with optical exposure to IR. Periodic health surveillance programs, possibly including lens evaluation, are also important to monitor cataract risk in these MI operators.

Occupational Exposure to Solar UV Radiation of a Group of Fishermen Working in the Italian North Adriatic Sea.

Occupational solar radiation exposure is a relevant heath risk in the fishing sector. Our aim was to provide a detailed evaluation of individual UV exposure in three different fishing activities in Italy, with personal UV dosimeters and a simple formula to calculate the fraction of ambient erythemal UV dose received by the workers. The potential individual UV exposure of the fishermen was between 65 and 542 Joules/m2. The percentages of the ambient exposure were estimated between 2.5% and 65.3%. Workers' UV exposure was mainly influenced by the characteristics of the work activity, the postures adopted, and the type of boats. Overall, our data showed that 43% of the daily measurements could result largely above the occupational limits of 1-1.3 standard erythemal dose (i.e., 100 Joules/m2) per day, in case of exposure of uncovered skin areas. Measurements of individual UV exposure are important not only to assess the risk but also to increase workers' perception and stimulate the adoption of preventive measures to reduce solar UV risk. Furthermore, the simple method proposed, linking ambient erythemal UV dose to the workers' exposure, can be a promising tool for a reliable assessment of the UV risk, as time series of environmental UV dose are widely available.

Chronic pelvic pain improvement: impact on quality of life and mood.

Women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) frequently suffer from mood disturbances and reduced quality of life. Whether pain improvement ameliorates mood and quality of life is still unclear, and it was investigated in an observational prospective study performed in a cohort of 117 of the outpatient services for endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain at a University Hospital. Depending on disease, women were treated either by surgery or by the administration of an estrogen-progestin or a progestin alone. Pain during menses, between menses and at intercourse was evaluated by a 100 mm visual analog (VAS) scale. Quality of life was evaluated by the SF-36 questionnaire, state of anxiety by the Y-1 form of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y1) and depression the Self Evaluating Depression Scale (SDS). Women were 34.2 ± 8.1 years old. After a mean follow-up period of 10.0 ± 9.1 months, and independently on treatment (43.6% surgery), pain during menses (-28.2 ± 36.8; p<.0001), between menses (-11.3 ± 37.1; p<.002) and at intercourse (-8.3 ± 35.4; p<.02) decreased. SF-36 increased (3.3 ± 16.2; p<.03), STAI slightly decreased (-1.9 ± 8.6; p<.02), while depression did not change (-0.7 ± 7.8; p=.36). Pain changes were not related to changes of SF-36 or mood scores. In women with CPP, prolonged pain amelioration, has little impact on mood, particularly on depression. The data support the need for a multidisciplinary approach to women with CPP.