Evaluación de la biopsia de fusión elástica vs. biopsia sistemática para la detección del cáncer de próstata: resultados de un estudio multicéntrico en 1.119 pacientes / Elastic fusion biopsy versus systematic biopsy for prostate cancer detection: Results of a multicentric study on 1.119 patients

Objetivos: Evaluar la precisión de las biopsias guiada y sistemática para la detección del cáncer de próstata (CP) y CP clínicamente significativo (CPCS) en la práctica diaria, analizando el requerimiento de biopsias sistemáticas adicionales en el momento de la biopsia guiada. Pacientes y métodos: De nuestra base de datos multicéntrica que incluye 2.115 pacientes sometidos a biopsia de fusión con el sistema Koelis(TM) entre 2010 y 2017, seleccionamos 1.119 pacientes que recibieron biopsias guiadas (una mediana de 3 por cada lesión), con posterior muestreo sistemático (12 a 14 núcleos). Se evaluó la tasa de detección de cáncer (TDC) global y clínicamente significativa de las biopsias de fusión de Koelis(TM), comparando la biopsia guiada con la sistemática. Como objetivo secundario, está la identificación de los predictores de detección de CP. Resultados: La TDC de la biopsia guiada fue del 48% para todos los tipos de cáncer y del 33% para el CPCS. El muestreo de próstata sistemático adicional mejoró la TDC global en un 15% y en un 12% para CPCS. Se detectó CP en el 35, 69 y 92% de los pacientes con lesiones calificadas como PI-RADS 3, 4 y 5, respectivamente. Una puntuación elevada de PI-RADS y un examen rectal digital positivo fueron factores predictores de CP, y la condición «biopsia naïve» se asoció con CPCS. Conclusión: En la práctica diaria, la biopsia guiada con Koelis(TM) logra una buena TDC para todos los CP y CPCS, y mejora significativamente con el muestreo sistemático posterior de la próstata. Los excelentes resultados de la biopsia por fusión se confirman también en pacientes naïve. La puntuación PI-RADS elevada y el examen rectal digital positivo están altamente asociados con la presencia de CP

Objectives: To assess the accuracy of targeted and systematic biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) in the everyday practice, evaluating the need for additional systematic biopsies at the time of targeted biopsy. Patients and methods: From our multicentric database gathering data on 2,115 patients who underwent fusion biopsy with Koelis(TM) system between 2010 and 2017, we selected 1,119 patients who received targeted biopsies (a median of 3 for each target), followed by systematic sampling of the prostate (12 to 14 cores). Overall and clinically significant cancer detection rate (CDR) of Koelis(TM) fusion biopsies were assessed, comparing target and systematic biopsies. Secondary endpoint was the identification of predictors of PCa detection. Results: The CDR of targeted biopsies only was 48% for all cancers and 33% for csPCa. The performance of additional, systematic prostate sampling improved the CDR of 15% for all cancers and of 12% for csPCa. PCa was detected in 35%, 69%, and 92% of patients with lesions scored as PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5, respectively. Elevated PI-RADS score and positive digital rectal examination were predictors of PCa, whereas biopsy-naïve status was associated with csPCa. Conclusion: In the everyday practice target biopsy with Koelis(TM) achieves a good CDR for all PCa and csPCa, which is significantly improved by subsequent systematic sampling of the prostate. The outstanding outcomes of fusion biopsy are confirmed also in biopsy-naïve patients. Elevated PI-RADS score and positive digital rectal examination are strongly associated with presence of PCa

Elastic fusion biopsy versus systematic biopsy for prostate cancer detection: Results of a multicentric study on 1,119 patients. / Evaluación de la biopsia de fusión elástica vs. biopsia sistemática para la detección del cáncer de próstata: resultados de un estudio multicéntrico en 1.119 pacientes.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of targeted and systematic biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) in the everyday practice, evaluating the need for additional systematic biopsies at the time of targeted biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From our multicentric database gathering data on 2,115 patients who underwent fusion biopsy with Koelis™ system between 2010 and 2017, we selected 1,119 patients who received targeted biopsies (a median of 3 for each target), followed by systematic sampling of the prostate (12 to 14 cores). Overall and clinically significant cancer detection rate (CDR) of Koelis™ fusion biopsies were assessed, comparing target and systematic biopsies. Secondary endpoint was the identification of predictors of PCa detection. RESULTS: The CDR of targeted biopsies only was 48% for all cancers and 33% for csPCa. The performance of additional, systematic prostate sampling improved the CDR of 15% for all cancers and of 12% for csPCa. PCa was detected in 35%, 69%, and 92% of patients with lesions scored as PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5, respectively. Elevated PI-RADS score and positive digital rectal examination were predictors of PCa, whereas biopsy-naïve status was associated with csPCa. CONCLUSION: In the everyday practice target biopsy with Koelis™ achieves a good CDR for all PCa and csPCa, which is significantly improved by subsequent systematic sampling of the prostate. The outstanding outcomes of fusion biopsy are confirmed also in biopsy-naïve patients. Elevated PI-RADS score and positive digital rectal examination are strongly associated with presence of PCa.

Rapid, economical treatment of large impacted calculi in the proximal ureter with ballistic ureteral lithotripsy and occlusive, percutaneous balloon catheter: the high pressure irrigation technique.

PURPOSE: We describe our innovative technique for the treatment of large calculi (greater than 1.5 cm) of the proximal ureter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2003 and 2005 we positioned an 8Ch pyelostomy in 25 patients diagnosed with impacted calculi of the proximal ureter greater than 1.5 cm on ultrasound, direct x-ray of the abdomen, and/or computerized tomography and subsequent retrograde pyelography. After 30 days all patients underwent combined treatment in the Valdivia supine position, including positioning a 0.035-inch guidewire through the pyelostomy into the ureter up to above the calculus, pyelostomy removal and insertion onto the guide of a 7Ch balloon occlusion catheter, which was inflated in the ureter immediately above the calculus. Ureteral lithotripsy was done with an 8.5 to 11.5Ch ureteroscope (Wolf, Dudley, Massachusetts) with a 6Ch operating channel and a Calcusplit ballistic probe, alternating high antegrade pressure by the balloon catheter and retrograde pressure using the ureteroscope, as required. After lithotripsy and fragment dislocation the ureteroscope was retracted with rapid flow antegrade irrigation. At the end of the procedure after antegrade contrast medium followup the balloon catheter was retracted as far as the pelvis as a nephrostomy. We analyzed operative time, the number of postoperative recovery days, the incidence of complications during and after surgery, and the stone-free rate immediately, after 5 days and after 1 month. RESULTS: Average calculus size was 1.7 cm. Ten patients presented with multiple ureteral bending upon diagnosis, which was no longer found at surgery with a consequent lack of difficult ureteroscope feeding. Significant edema downstream of the calculus was present in all cases. High pressure irrigation, a rigid ballistic probe and retrieving forceps enabled the dislocation of even larger fragments from the original calculous site in all cases. Antegrade high pressure irrigation after lithotripsy enabled the complete clearance of calcareous fragments as far as the bladder without the need for ancillary maneuvers. We observed no cases of calcareous fragment push-back. No retroperitoneal extravasation, or pyelolymphatic or pyelovenous backflow was observed. Average procedure time was 33 minutes. The renal-ureteral stone-free rate was 100% at the end of the procedure and all calcareous fragments were in the bladder. We did not observe any ureteral lesions. In no case was there onset of fever. Average postoperative hospitalization was 2 days. Followup with contrast material after 5 days showed a renal-ureteral stone-free rate of 100% and a bladder stone-free rate of 84%. The nephrostomy was removed at an average of 5.5 days. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the techniques described in the medical literature our method appears to have certain advantages, including a mini-invasive approach to the renal pelvis compared to that of percutaneous nephrolithotomy with protection of the renal parenchyma from high pressure, rigid ureteroscope use, which provides a high level of maneuverability and low operating costs, ballistic probe use, which provides lower costs and higher speeds than the laser, and balloon catheter use, which removes the risk of push-back and enables push-down of the fragments without any further ancillary maneuvers. The balloon catheter also enables contrast medium followup and immediate postoperative drainage. The speed of the procedure and the ability to adjust antegrade or retrograde flow with variable pressure and direction make this technique highly suitable for the complete resolution of large, impacted calculi of the proximal ureter.

[Fragments of prostatic biopsy: characteristics, dimensions, and number]. / I frammenti di biopsia prostatica: caratteristiche, dimensioni e numero.

Prostate needle biopsy can give important clinical information on tumor extension and grading, useful prognostic parameters for the therapeutic choice and prognostic definition. Currently about the 25% of positive biopsies for carcinoma contain only small foci of cancer that makes histopathological evaluation often the difficult and less reliable. We reviewed the literature about different methods to perform needle biopsies and methods to improve histologic yield of prostatic biopsies in order to obtain more histopathological information on the specimens to improve diagnostic accuracy on core biopsy. We report our initial experience using the preembedding methods proposed by Rogatsch. The best method to perform a prostate biopsy includes the use of using 18-gauges needles, single specimen identification and subsequent orientation of every bioptic fragment by inking its proximal end. We performed the preembedding technique of the fragments, proposed by Rogatsch et al., stretching the fragment between two nylon meshes enclosed in a tissue cassette in formalin. The full length of the biopsy is within the section plane. This technique partially modified in our preliminary experience with the employment of two sponges containing 10% buffered formalin placed in a tissue cassette (2.8 x 3.3 cm). This "sandwich" technique has furnished evident advantages for the pathologist, optimizing the visible area for section plane in comparison to that obtainable from free floating core biopsies. In conclusion, routinely application of the preembedding prostatic core biopsies could improve the accuracy of the histopathological examination and therefore provide more reliable data on tumor extension and grade.

[Intraprostatic spread of prostatic carcinoma: stereographic representation based on ultrasonography and biopsy findings]. / Diffusione ghiandolare del carcinoma prostatico: schema di rappresentazione steroegrafica su reperti ecografici e bioptici.

The aim of this study is to identify and evaluate a scheme of graphic representation of the prostate, that allows the reconstruction of cancer diffusion based on ultrasound findings and on histological biopsy findings. A graphical representation of the prostate using transversal and longitudinal sections is represented by the US-operator, who write severy single performed biopsies (site, directions, and angle) and draws the US relieves. Biopsy specimens are separately prepared on a paper-support and marked at one extremity with china ink. The histopathological examination on every single specimen allows to identify the tumor extent, Gleason grading and the percentage occupied by the neoplasia. Were performed 50 transrectal echo-guided mapping biopsies. Comparing biopsy results with the pathological analysis on 13 whole-mount radical prostatectomy: pathological stage was predicted in 6 of 7 cases, Gleason grading was predicted in 85% of cases. In 5 cases in which the core biopsy histological analysis showed only atypical glands suspicious for cancer it has been possible to repeat new biopsies in the same site of the gland. Tumor was this time diagnosed in 3 of 5 cases (60%). The proposed approach can be useful to reduce variables linked to operator, technique, and single clinical situation, but it needs an employment on a higher number of cases and a verification on more surgical specimens. The scheme proposed has been of easy complication and immediate interpretation by clinicians and pathologists.

[Ultrasound-guided cryosurgery of the prostate: short- and long-term experience]. / Criochirurgia ecoguidata della prostata: esperienza a breve e medio termine.

We have assessed 24 patients consecutively treated with cryosurgery and chosen according to the guidelines of the European Study Group of Urologic Cryosurgeons. Of the 24 patients (average age about 70, range 61-79), all were not considered candidates for radical prostatectomy, 9 (37%) were clinical stage cT2 N0M0, 15 (63%) cT3 N0M0 who had not received any prior treatment, except 1 patient (61 years old) who was treated with TCT and successive recurrence of the disease (cT2). Of the 24 chosen patients, 13 (55%) were over the age of 71, 11 (45%) had important factors of co-morbidity and an elevated risk of surgery (ASA 3). The average PSA was of 19.3 ng/ml (range 2.2-61). Gleason score was 2-5 in 9 cases, 6-7 in 14 and 8-10 in 1 case. In the follow-up, we evaluated serum PSA every 3 months and transrectal ultrasound and the echoguided prostatic biopsies at 6, 12 and 24 months. Post-operative complications included: ecchymosis and edema of external genitals (16/24), fever > 38 degrees C (1/24), sloughing syndrome (6/24), urinary tract infections (10/24) acute urine retention (1/24). In 2 cases, 6 months after treatment, a transrectal resection was carried out. After a follow-up at 6 months, the PSA was 0.4 ng/ml (range 0.1-0.9), in 1 case. In positive core biopsy out of 6 showed neoplastic cells with fibrous tissue; the patient had a PSA of 0.58 ng/ml. At 12 months there were 11 assessable patients. The average PSA was 0.3 ng/ml (range 0.1-0.9). At 24 months there were 4 assessable patients, 1 of 4 showed serum PSA level of 4 ng/ml and cancer in apical biopsy. Erectile dysfunction was assessed on 8 patients affective before surgery: 1 referred to sufficient erections at penetration (1/8, 12.5%). After removal of the catheter, 4 of the 20 patients suffered stress and urge incontinence with the use of 1 pad a day. In 1 case, 18 months from surgery, slight stress incontinence was found (1 pad/day). Cryoablation is an efficient method and is given to slight post-operative morbidity and no intra-operative mortality, also in patients with high risk for open surgery. Indications may be found in patients with the following conditions: older than 72 years, severe co-morbidity and high risk for surgery, neoplasia at high risk of progression, and disease recurrence after radiotherapy. Our case history is at the moment encouraging and a larger number of cases as well as longer follow-up are needed.

[Role of transrectal ultrasonography in the follow-up of patients treated with prostatic cryosurgery]. / Ruolo dell'ecografia transrettale nel follow-up dei pazienti sottoposti a criochirurgia prostatica.

Cryosurgery of prostate is a minimally invasive treatment for localized cancer. Imaging techniques (transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) or magnetic resonance) have been proposed to evaluate tumor persistence/recurrence after cryosurgical treatment other than serum PSA and prostate biopsies. Actually, criteria to identify cancer after cryosurgical ablation are not well assessed. Aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical significance and role of TRUS in detecting tumor within the former prostate gland after cryoablation. We evaluated ultrasound (US) features and imaging, serum PSA and biopsies in 20 patients treated by cryosurgery at our Hospital with a mean follow-up of 18 months. Twenty patients (mean age 70 years, PSA 25.9 ng/ml, clinical stage: 10 T2 N0M0 and 10 T3 N0M0) were followed up for a mean of 16 months. Ultrasound findings (gland volume, capsule, hypoechoic area, post-voided urine volume, seminal vesicles) were correlated to PSA levels (every 3 months) and prostate biopsies (6, 12 and 24 months). All cases were evaluated by the same ultrasound scanner (Eidos, Hitachi-5-6.5 MHz) and by two operators. Prostate capsule was interrupted by hypo-hyperechoic areas in all cases. Transition zone was no more recognizable. Ultrasound findings showed in all cases hypoechoic areas, but US did not identified tumor recurrence in 2 patients. During follow-up, PSA below 0.5 ng/ml was recorded in 75% of cases. We detected tumor in 2 cases, respectively 12 and 18 months after cryosurgery: in the first case few residual cancer cells within fibrous tissue were found in 1 out of 6 biopsies at 6 months (PSA 0.58 ng/ml), in the second one, tumor with viable normal prostatic glands was found in one biopsy of the apex at 18 months (PSA 4.0 ng/ml). TRUS showed several anaechoic foci with necrotic tissue and coalescence of liquid areas in 2 patients (one developed acute urinary retention). Actually, serum PSA is the best marker in order to detect clinically significant tumor after cryosurgery. Hypoechoic areas and capsule interruptions observed by ultrasound imaging of prostate gland after cryosurgery are not correlated with tumor recurrence or tumor persistence. TRUS is only indicated for ultrasound-guided biopsies during follow-up and to confirm urologic complications.