Trial of Lixisenatide in Early Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Lixisenatide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist used for the treatment of diabetes, has shown neuroprotective properties in a mouse model of Parkinson's disease. METHODS: In this phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assessed the effect of lixisenatide on the progression of motor disability in persons with Parkinson's disease. Participants in whom Parkinson's disease was diagnosed less than 3 years earlier, who were receiving a stable dose of medications to treat symptoms, and who did not have motor complications were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to daily subcutaneous lixisenatide or placebo for 12 months, followed by a 2-month washout period. The primary end point was the change from baseline in scores on the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III (range, 0 to 132, with higher scores indicating greater motor disability), which was assessed in patients in the on-medication state at 12 months. Secondary end points included other MDS-UPDRS subscores at 6, 12, and 14 months and doses of levodopa equivalent. RESULTS: A total of 156 persons were enrolled, with 78 assigned to each group. MDS-UPDRS part III scores at baseline were approximately 15 in both groups. At 12 months, scores on the MDS-UPDRS part III had changed by -0.04 points (indicating improvement) in the lixisenatide group and 3.04 points (indicating worsening disability) in the placebo group (difference, 3.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 5.30; P = 0.007). At 14 months, after a 2-month washout period, the mean MDS-UPDRS motor scores in the off-medication state were 17.7 (95% CI, 15.7 to 19.7) with lixisenatide and 20.6 (95% CI, 18.5 to 22.8) with placebo. Other results relative to the secondary end points did not differ substantially between the groups. Nausea occurred in 46% of participants receiving lixisenatide, and vomiting occurred in 13%. CONCLUSIONS: In participants with early Parkinson's disease, lixisenatide therapy resulted in less progression of motor disability than placebo at 12 months in a phase 2 trial but was associated with gastrointestinal side effects. Longer and larger trials are needed to determine the effects and safety of lixisenatide in persons with Parkinson's disease. (Funded by the French Ministry of Health and others; LIXIPARK ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03439943.).

Descriptive analysis of the French NS-Park registry: Towards a nation-wide Parkinson's disease cohort?

INTRODUCTION: Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer's. The French clinical research network for PD (NS-Park) has created a national patient registry to i)report medical activity of Parkinson Expert Centers (PECs) to the Ministry of Health, ii)facilitate PD patients pre-screening for clinical trials, iii) provide a source for pharmaco-epidemiology studies. OBJECTIVE: Assess the French Parkinsonian population at a nation-wide level and discover new clinical characteristics. METHODS: In this feasibility study, PECs prospectively collected clinical data in a standardized manner. The population main clinical characteristics are described, focusing on motor and non-motor symptoms and treatments, assessing its representativeness. By using an unbiased clustering with multiple correspondence analysis (MCA), we also investigate potential relationships between multiple variables like symptoms and treatments, as clues for future studies. RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2016, among 11,157 included parkinsonian syndromes, 9454 (85%) had PD. MCA identified various profiles depending on disease duration. Occurrences of motor complications, axial signs, cognitive disorders and Levodopa use increase over time. Neurovegetative symptoms, psychiatric disorders, sleep disturbances and impulse control disorders (ICDs) seem stable over time. As expected, ICDs were associated to dopaminergic agonist use but other associations, such as ICDs and sleep disturbances for instance, or anxiety and depression, were found. CONCLUSIONS: Our results report one of the biggest PD registries ever reported and demonstrate the feasibility of implementing a nation-wide registry of PD patients in France, a potent tool for future longitudinal studies and clinical trials' population selection, and for pharmaco-epidemiology and cost-effectiveness studies.

Dopaminergic denervation using [123I]-FPCIT and pain in Parkinson's disease: a correlation study.

In patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), abnormal activations of nociceptive brain areas and lowered pain thresholds were reported, probably reflecting a central modification of pain processing. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible correlation between the striatal and extrastriatal dopaminergic system and pain threshold in PD patients. We included 25 PD patients with various intensities of central pain (visual analog scale). Subjective pain threshold (thermotest) and a motor examination (UPDRS III) were performed. Patients underwent SPECT imaging with [123I]-FP-CIT. We analyzed the correlation between [123I]-FP-CIT binding and subjective pain threshold, using a simple linear regression model for striatal uptake and a voxel-based approach for extrastriatal uptake. The covariables were age, sex, duration of PD, and UPDRS motor score. A pain matrix mask was also used to identify clusters in relation with pain matrix. Striatal analysis revealed that [123I]-FP-CIT binding was negatively correlated with age (p = 0.02), duration of PD (p = 0.0002) and UPDRS motor score (p = 0.006), but no correlation with pain threshold was observed. The extrastriatal analysis showed a positive correlation between [123I]-FP-CIT binding and subjective heat pain threshold for the left posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) (p < 0.001) and negative correlations for the right secondary visual cortex (p < 0.001) and left insula (p < 0.001). When applying the pain matrix mask, correlations remained significant only in the left PCC and the left insula. We suggest that pain perception abnormalities in PD are not directly related to striatal dopaminergic dysfunction. Painful sensations may be related to extrastriatal monoaminergic systems.

Naftazone in advanced Parkinson's disease: An acute L-DOPA challenge randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: There is an unmet need to better control motor complications in Parkinson's disease (PD). Naftazone, which exhibits glutamate release inhibition properties, has shown antiparkinsonian and antidyskinetic activity in preclinical models of PD and in a clinical proof of concept study. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled cross-over trial in PD patients with motor fluctuations and dyskinesia testing naftazone 160 mg/day versus placebo for 14 days. The two co-primary endpoints were the area under curve (AUC) of motor (MDS-UPDRS part III) and dyskinesia (AIMS) scores during an acute levodopa challenge performed at the end of each period. Secondary endpoints were UDysRS and axial symptoms scores during the challenge; AIMS, UDysRS, and time spent with or without dyskinesia the day before the challenge. The primary analysis was performed in the per protocol population. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were included in the analysis. There was no difference between naftazone and placebo for the AUC of MDS-UPDRS III (-89, 95%CI[-1071; 893], p = 0.85), and AIMS (70, 95%CI[-192; 332], p = 0.57). At the end of treatment periods, AIMS score tended to be lower with naftazone than placebo (4.4 ±â€¯3.4 versus 6.7 ±â€¯4.4, p = 0.07), but UDysRS scores and other secondary outcomes were not different. Naftazone was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not confirm previous results on the efficacy of naftazone on dyskinesia nor motor fluctuations highlighting the problem of translating results obtained in preclinical models into clinical trials. Further investigation of naftazone may be conducted in PD with longer treatment duration.

Withdrawing amantadine in dyskinetic patients with Parkinson disease: the AMANDYSK trial.

OBJECTIVE: The AMANDYSK trial was designed to assess long-term efficacy of chronic treatment with amantadine in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) and levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID). METHODS: This was a 3-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, wash-out study conducted in 57 amantadine-treated (≥200 mg/d for ≥6 months) dyskinetic patients with PD. The primary outcome measure was the change from baseline in a Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) dyskinesia subscore (items 32 [duration] + 33 [severity]). Secondary outcomes included other LID measurements ("responders" analysis, premature dropout for LID, Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale). Exploratory outcomes included time with troublesome dyskinesia as measured by diaries, UPDRS Motor Examination (part III) for motor symptoms of PD, and fatigue and apathy scores for nonmotor symptoms. RESULTS: UPDRS items 32 + 33 deteriorated more in patients switched to placebo ("discontinuing" group) (+1.7 ± 2.0 units; 95% confidence interval 0.9, 2.4) as compared with those maintained on amantadine ("continuing" group) (+0.2 ± 1.5 units; 95% confidence interval -0.4, 0.8; p = 0.003). Secondary outcomes confirmed this difference because there were significantly more responders, more dropouts for LID, greater increase in "ON" time with troublesome dyskinesia, and greater worsening of Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale score in the discontinuing group. There were no between-group differences in the UPDRS Motor Examination, whereas apathy (as measured by caregivers) and fatigue scores tended to worsen more in patients randomized to placebo. CONCLUSION: Wash-out of amantadine in dyskinetic patients with PD significantly worsened LID. No significant effect was observed on motor parkinsonian symptoms, while exploratory outcomes suggested that amantadine might improve apathy and fatigue in such patients. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This article provides Class II evidence that in patients with PD, withdrawing amantadine significantly aggravates LID in a median time of 7 days.

Effect of subthalamic deep brain stimulation on pain in Parkinson's disease.

Painful sensations are common in Parkinson's disease. In many patients, such sensations correspond to neuropathic pain and could be related to central alterations of pain processing. Subthalamic nuclei deep brain stimulation improves motor function in Parkinson's disease. Several structures of the basal ganglia are involved in nociceptive function, and deep brain stimulation could thus also modify pain perception in Parkinson's disease. To test this hypothesis, we compared subjective heat pain thresholds, in deep brain stimulation OFF and ON conditions in 2 groups of Parkinson's disease patients with or without neuropathic pain. We also compared pain-induced cerebral activations during experimental nociceptive stimulations using H(2)(15)O positron emission tomography in both deep brain stimulation OFF and ON conditions. Correlation analyses were performed between clinical and neuroimaging results. Deep brain stimulation significantly increased subjective heat pain threshold (from 40.3 ± 4.2 to 41.6 ± 4.3, P=.03) and reduced pain-induced cerebral activity in the somatosensory cortex (BA 40) in patients with pain, whereas it had no effect in pain-free patients. There was a significant negative correlation in the deep brain stimulation OFF condition between pain threshold and pain-induced activity in the insula of patients who were pain free but not in those who had pain. There was a significant positive correlation between deep brain stimulation-induced changes in pain threshold and in pain-induced cerebral activations in the primary somatosensory cortex and insula of painful patients only. These results suggest that subthalamic nuclei deep brain stimulation raised pain thresholds in Parkinson's disease patients with pain and restored better functioning of the lateral discriminative pain system.

Emerging analgesic drugs for Parkinson's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Pain affects between 40 and 85% of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. It is a frequently disabling and overlooked feature, which can significantly reduce health-related quality of life. Unfortunately, there are no universally recommended treatments for this condition. AREAS COVERED: Evidence about the efficacy and safety of available analgesic treatments is summarized in this review. Potential targets for upcoming therapies are then discussed in light of what is currently known about the physiopathology of pain in PD. Protocols for efficacy and safety assessment of novel analgesic therapies are discussed. Finally, critical aspects of study protocol design such as patient selection or outcomes to be evaluated are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Preliminary results indicate that duloxetine, cranial electrotherapy stimulation, rotigotine, subthalamic or pallidum nuclei stimulation or lesion or levodopa could be effective for treating pain in PD. Similarly, some case reports indicate that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or apomorphine could be effective for relieving painful off-period dystonia. Clinical trials with rTMS or oxycodone/naloxone prolonged-release tablets for neuropathic pain or botulinum toxin for off-period dystonia are underway. Success of clinical trials about analgesic strategies in PD will depend on the selection of the right PD population to be treated, according to the type of pain, and the proper selection of study outcomes and follow-up of international recommendations.

Apomorphine effect on pain threshold in Parkinson's disease: a clinical and positron emission tomography study.

Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) frequently experience pain that could be in part due to central modification of nociception. In this randomized controlled double blind study, we compared the effect of apomorphine versus placebo on pain thresholds and pain-induced cerebral activity in 25 patients with PD. Subjective pain threshold (using thermal stimulation, thermotest), objective pain threshold (nociceptive flexion reflex), and cerebral activity (H(2)(15)O PET) during noxious and innocuous stimulations were performed. Neither subjective nor objective pain thresholds nor pain activation profile were modified by apomorphine compared with placebo in 25 PD patients. Apomorphine has no effect on pain processing in PD. We suggest that other monoamine systems than dopaminergic system could be involved.