Congenital stationary night blindness in a patient with mild learning disability due to a compound heterozygous microdeletion of 15q13 and a missense mutation in TRPM1.

The complete form of congenital stationary night blindness (cCSNB) represents a non-progressive retinal disorder characterized by night vision problems and often congenital nystagmus, reduced vision, high myopia, strabismus and normal fundus appearance. Clinically this form of CSNB can be diagnosed by full-field electroretinogram. The mode of inheritance can be X-linked and autosomal recessive with mutations in genes coding for proteins mainly present at the dendritic tips of ON-bipolar cells. Mutations in NYX, GRM6, GPR179, LRIT3 and TRPM1 lead to this condition. The latter gene defect represents the major form underlying cCSNBC. It codes for the melastatin-related transient receptor 1 expressed in the inner nuclear layer of the retina, with the protein localized in ON-bipolar cells. To date, various homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations in TRPM1 have been reported. Small chromosomal rearrangements are frequent cause of mental retardation. In rare cases deletions can overlap with a mutation on the remaining chromosome and lead to a recessive disorder. Here, we describe a patient with mild neurological deficiencies and cCSNB caused by a microdeletion on 15q32 overlapping with a TRPM1 variant.

Portosystemic encephalopathy in an 86-year-old patient : a clinical challenge.

Abernethy malformations are rare vascular abnormalities, classified into two types : type 1 if the portal vein is absent, type 2 when the portal blood is diverted into vena cava through a hypoplastic portal vein. These conditions present symptoms related to portosystemic shunting, and usually become clinically evident in children or young adults. Here we report the first case of Abernethy malformation diagnosed in an 86-year-old female patient affected by portosystemicencephalopaty.

Application of clinical indexes in ulcerative colitis patients in regular follow-up visit: correlation with endoscopic 'mucosal healing' and implication for management. Preliminary results.

OBJECTIVE: Ulcerative Colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the colon of unknown etiology. Several clinical indexes have been proposed for UC disease activity evaluation, but none have been properly validated. Moreover, the reference parameter for the scores and their prognostic value is not clear. Mucosal healing has been recently proposed as an important end-point. Aim of the present study was to evaluate the correlation of four clinical indexes with objective diagnostic tools for UC evaluation, the discriminative ability in identifying patients with endoscopic mucosal healing, and to analyze the possible prognostic indication for disease course in 1 year of follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed data of 75 patients recorded in regular follow-up visit in IBD clinic at S. Andrea Hospital, Rome, between 2007-2011. We recorded clinical data and lab tests at the time of the visit, and endoscopic/histological reports performed within 1 month. Clinical indexes (Seo' activity index, Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index, partial Mayo score and Endoscopic-Clinical Correlation Index) were calculated and correlation to endoscopic and histologic activity, and to C-reactive protein increment, was assessed by mean of Spearman's rank correlation. Discriminative ability of the indexes for patients with and without endoscopic mucosal healing was tested by calculation of area under ROC curve (AUC). Patients with low and high clinical scores were compared for number of flares and increment of therapy during 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS: Clinical indexes had a good correlation with endoscopic activity (mean r = 0.73 ± 0.06), a fair correlation with CRP-increment (mean r = 0.55 ± 0.01) and a poor one with histologic activity (mean r = 0.35 ± 0.01). The discriminatory ability of the indexes for endoscopic mucosal healing was good for all the indexes (mean AUC = 0.87 ± 0.05). Patients with high clinical score had more flares and required more frequently increase of therapy at 1 year of follow up compared with patients with low score. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical indexes have a good correlation with endoscopic activity and can discriminate patients with and without mucosal healing. Patients with low and high score have different risk of disease flare and of need to increase therapy at 1 year. Clinical indexes may represent a useful tool for disease assessment in clinical practice in UC outpatients with mild-moderate disease.