Paramedic accuracy using SALT triage after a brief initial training.

OBJECTIVE: To determine paramedics' understanding of and accuracy using SALT (sort-assess-lifesaving interventions-treatment/transport) triage, a proposed national guideline for primary triage during mass-casualty incidents, immediately and four months after training. METHODS: A 20-minute lecture on SALT triage was provided to all paramedics (n = 320) from a single county during mandatory continuing education. Triage concepts were reemphasized during a 10-minute small-group lecture throughout the study period as part of standard refresher training. After the initial training, all paramedics were asked to complete a posttest consisting of three general knowledge questions about SALT triage and 10 patient scenarios in which they had to assign a triage category. The same test was administered four months after the original educational session. Demographic and job experience information was also obtained. Responses were scored and matched for each paramedic and compared using paired t-test. RESULTS: A total of 290 (91%) paramedics completed the initial posttest. They correctly answered an average (± standard deviation) of 10.7 ± 2.3 of the 13 questions (82%). For the 10 patient scenarios, they correctly triaged an average of 8.1 ± 2.0 patients. A total of 159 paramedics completed both tests. Sixty-seven percent had more than 10 years of emergency medical services (EMS) experience; 72% had prior mass-casualty drill experience; 51% had prior actual mass-casualty experience; and 23% had heard of SALT triage prior to the training. There were no statistically significant differences in initial test scores for any of these demographic groups. For those subjects who completed both tests, the mean overall score for the initial test was 10.9 ± 1.9 (84%) and for the later test was 11.0 ± 1.9 (85%) (p < 0.770; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.3 to 0.3). For the 10 patient scenarios, the paramedics correctly triaged an average of 8.3 ± 1.7 patients on the initial test and 8.3 ± 1.4 patients on the later test (p < 0.565; 95% CI -0.4 to 0.2). CONCLUSION: Following a short didactic course, paramedics were able to accurately perform SALT triage during a written scenario. Four months after the training, they had retained their understanding of and accuracy using SALT triage. It appears that a brief educational tool was effective for training EMS providers in SALT triage.

Sowing the seeds. A study of employment expectations of EMT students reveals important info for EMS managers.

Although EMS recruitment and retention issues have been frequently discussed, little scientific research has been conducted to determine why people are entering and leaving the EMS field. To date no research has been done to analyze the demographics of people enrolling in EMT classes and determine what their attitudes and expectations are for employment.

Disaster training for prehospital providers.

OBJECTIVE: To survey prehospital providers to determine 1) the quantity and format of training recalled over the past year in chemical, biological, radiological/nuclear (CBRN), and other mass casualty events (MCEs); 2) preferred educational formats; 3) self-assessed preparedness for various CBRN/MCEs; and 4) perceived likelihood of occurrence for CBRN/MCEs. METHODS: A survey, consisting of 11 questions, was distributed to 1,010 prehospital providers in a system where no formal CBRN/mass casualty training was given. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 640 (63%) prehospital providers. Twenty-two percent (22%) of prehospital providers recalled no training within the past year for CBRN or other MCEs, 19% reported 1-5 hours, 15% reported 6-10 hours, 24% reported 11-39 hours, and 7% reported receiving greater than 40 hours. Lectures and drills were the most common formats for prior education. On a five-point scale (1: "Never Helpful" through 5: "Always Helpful") regarding the helpfulness of training methods, median scores were the following: drills-5, lectures-4, self-study packets-3, Web-based learning-3, and other-4. On another five-point scale (1: "Totally Unprepared" through 5: "Strongly Prepared"), prehospital providers felt most prepared for MCEs-4, followed by chemical-4, biological-3, and radiation/nuclear-3. Over half (61%) felt MCEs were "Somewhat Likely" or "Very Likely" to occur, whereas chemical (42%), biological (38%), or radiation/nuclear (33%) rated lower. CONCLUSION: The amount of training in the past year reported for CBRN events varied greatly, with almost a quarter recalling no education. Drills and lectures were the most used and preferred formats for disaster training. Prehospital providers felt least prepared for a radiological;/nuclear event. Future studies should focus on the consistency and quality of education provided.