Current Approaches for Dissolution Similarity Assessment, Requirements, and Global Expectations.

This report summarizes podium presentations and breakout sessions from the second day of the 2019 M-CERSI workshop on In Vitro Dissolution Similarity Assessment in Support of Drug Product Quality: What, How, and When? Presenters from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Health Canada (HC), European Medicines Agency (EMA), Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency (ANVISA), and the pharmaceutical industry shared experiences/concerns with dissolution profile similarity assessment supporting minor/moderate Chemistry, Manufacturing and Control (CMC) changes. Members from regulatory agencies explained that dissolution profile similarity testing is only part of the overall assessment of the acceptability of the proposed changes; decisions are usually made based on aggregate weight of evidence. Scientific shortcomings of f2 were highlighted but no proposal on how to replace it was made. Controlling dissolution timepoint variability and application of pairwise batch-to-batch comparisons (PBC) of dissolution profiles caused considerable debate. Several industry participants suggested increased sample sizes to raise confidence in decision-making and to avoid PBC. They proposed identification of a single mathematical method with predefined acceptance criteria and suggested that dissolution timepoint selection should follow EMA and HC guidance. A majority of meeting attendees favored applying clinically relevant dissolution specifications (CRDS) and dissolution safe space to determine the impact of minor/moderate CMC changes as opposed to dissolution profile similarity assessment via statistical methods. Day 2 of the workshop highlighted the need and opportunities for global harmonization including variability, timepoint selection, role of CRDS, and statistical methods to address the ambiguity globally operating pharmaceutical companies are currently facing.

In Vitro Biopredictive Methods: A Workshop Summary Report.

This workshop report summarizes the proceedings of Day 1 of a three-day workshop on "Current State and Future Expectations of Translational Modeling Strategies to Support Drug Product Development, Manufacturing Changes and Controls". Physiologically based biopharmaceutics models (PBBM) are tools which enable the drug product quality attributes to be linked to the in vivo performance. These tools rely on key quality inputs in order to provide reliable predictions. After introducing the objectives of the workshop and the expectations from the breakout sessions, Day 1 of the workshop focused on the best practices and challenges in measuring in vitro inputs needed for modeling, such as the drug solubility, the dissolution rate of the drug product, potential precipitation of the drug and drug permeability. This paper reports the podium presentations and summarizes breakout session discussions related to A) the best strategies for determining solubility, supersaturation and critical supersaturation; B) the best strategies for the development of biopredictive (clinically relevant) dissolution methods; C) the challenges associated with describing gastro-intestinal systems parameters such as mucus, liquid volume and motility; and D) the challenges with translating biopharmaceutical measures of drug permeability along the gastrointestinal tract to a meaningful model parameter.

Current State and Future Expectations of Translational Modeling Strategies to Support Drug Product Development, Manufacturing Changes and Controls: A Workshop Summary Report.

The implementation of clinically relevant drug product specifications (CRDPS) depends on establishing a link between in vitro performance and in vivo exposure. The scientific community, including regulatory agencies, relies on biopharmaceutics tools on the in vitro performance side, while to enable the link to in vivo exposure, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling offers much promise. However, when it comes to PBPK applications in support of CRDPS, otherwise called physiologically based biopharmaceutics models (PBBM), the tools are not yet at the desired level. Currently, it is not possible to integrate detailed variations in chemistry, manufacturing and controls (CMC) attributes and parameters into these models in a way that can consistently predict their effect on local and systemic drug exposure. Specifically, to achieve the desired level, there is a need to advance the science and policy of PBBM. This manuscript summarizes the proceedings of a three-day workshop where the following themes were discussed: 1) Challenges in the development and implementation of in vitro biopredictive tools needed for successful mechanistic modeling; 2) Best practices in model development, verification and validation; and 3) Appropriate terminology (e.g., PBBM vs. PBPK models for biopharmaceutics applications) and applications of PBBM in support of drug product quality.

Applications of Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modeling (PBBM) to Support Drug Product Quality: A Workshop Summary Report.

This report summarizes the proceedings for Day 3 of the workshop titled "Current State and Future Expectations of Translational Modeling Strategies toSupportDrug Product Development, Manufacturing Changes and Controls". From a drug product quality perspective, patient-centric product development necessitates the development of clinically relevant drug product specifications (CRDPS). In this regard, Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics modeling (PBBM) is a viable tool to establish links between in-vitro to in-vivo data, and support with establishing CRDPS. The theme of day 3 was practical applications of PBBM to support drug product quality. In this manuscript, case studies from US FDA, EMA and pharmaceutical industry on applications of PBBM in drug product quality are summarized which include 1) regulatory agency's perspectives on establishing the safe space and achieving study waivers, 2) model-informed risk assessment on the effects of acid reducing agents, bridging of dissolution methods, food effect, and formulation selection, and 3) understanding clinical formulation performance. Breakout session discussions focused on four topics - 1) terminologies related to physiologically based modeling in support of drug product quality, 2) regulatory harmonization on evidentiary standards, 3) CRDPS approaches and 4) bridging between biorelevant and quality control (QC) dissolution methods.

Development and Validation of Sample Preparation and an HPLC Analytical Method for Dissolution Testing in Fed-State Simulated Gastric Fluid-Illustrating Its Application for Ibuprofen and Ketoconazole Immediate Release Tablets.

Dissolution testing and solubility determinations in different biorelevant media have gained considerable interest in the pharmaceutical industry from early-stage development of new products to forecasting bioequivalence. Among all biorelevant fluids, the preparation of fed-state simulated gastric fluid (FeSSGF) and handling of samples from dissolution/solubility testing in FeSSGF is considered to be relatively challenging. Challenges include maintaining the stability of FeSSGF medium upon sampling, filtration, and mitigating analytical interference of excipients and milk components. To overcome these challenges, standard and uniform working practices are required that are not only helpful in preparation of stable FeSSGF but also serve as a harmonizing guide for the collection of dissolution/solubility samples and their subsequent processing (i.e., handling and assay). The optimization of sample preparation methodology is crucial to reduce method-related variance by ensuring specificity, robustness, and reproducibility with acceptable recovery of the analytes. The sample preparation methodology includes a combination of techniques including filtration, solvent treatment, and centrifugation to remove the interfering media-related components and excipients from the analyte. The analytes of interest were chromatographically separated from the interfering analytes to quantify the drug concentration using the new high-performance liquid chromatography methods with ultraviolet detection. The methods developed allow rapid sample preparation, acceptable specificity, reproducible recoveries (greater than 95% of label claim), and quantification of study drugs (ibuprofen and ketoconazole). The sample preparation technique and method considerations provided here for ibuprofen and ketoconazole can serve as a starting point for solubility and dissolution testing of other small molecules in FeSSGF.

In Vitro Dissolution Profiles Similarity Assessment in Support of Drug Product Quality: What, How, When-Workshop Summary Report.

The pharmaceutical industry and regulatory agencies rely on dissolution similarity testing to make critical product performance decisions as part of drug product life cycle management. Accordingly, the application of mathematical approaches to evaluate dissolution profile similarity is described in regulatory guidance. However, the requirements (e.g., which time points, number of time points, %CV) to apply the widely known similarity factor f2 and other alternative statistical approaches diverge noticeably across regulatory agencies. In an effort to highlight current practices to assess dissolution profile similarity and to strive towards global harmonization, a workshop entitled "in vitro dissolution similarity assessment in support of drug product quality: what, how, when" was held May 21-22, 2019, at the University of Maryland, Baltimore. This article summarizes key points from the podium presentations and breakout (BO) sessions focusing on (1) contrasting the advantages and disadvantages of several statistical methods; (2) the importance of experimental design for successful similarity evaluation; (3) the value of similarity evaluation in light of clinically relevant specifications; and (4) the need for creating a robust and scientifically appropriate path (e.g., non-prescriptive decision tree) for dissolution profile similarity assessment as a stepping stone for global harmonization.

Applications of Clinically Relevant Dissolution Testing: Workshop Summary Report.

This publication summarizes the proceedings of day 3 of a 3-day workshop on "Dissolution and Translational Modeling Strategies Enabling Patient-Centric Product Development." Specifically, this publication discusses the current approaches in building clinical relevance into drug product development for solid oral dosage forms, along with challenges that both industry and regulatory agencies are facing in setting clinically relevant drug product specifications (CRDPS) as presented at the workshop. The concept of clinical relevance is a multidisciplinary effort which implies an understanding of the relationship between the critical quality attributes (CQAs) and their impact on predetermined clinical outcomes. Developing this level of understanding, in many cases, requires introducing deliberate but meaningful variations into the critical material attributes (CMAs) and critical process parameters (CPPs) to establish a relationship between the resulting in vitro dissolution/release profiles and in vivo PK performance, a surrogate for clinical outcomes. Alternatively, with the intention of improving the efficiency of the drug product development process by limiting the burden of conducting in vivo studies, this understanding can be either built, or at least enhanced, through in silico efforts, such as IVIVC and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) absorption modeling and simulation (M&S). These approaches enable dissolution testing to establish safe boundaries and reject drug product batches falling outside of the established safe range (e.g., due to inadequate in vivo performance) enabling the method to become clinically relevant. Ultimately, these efforts contribute towards patient-centric drug product development and allow regulatory flexibility throughout the lifecycle of the drug product.

Regulatory Perspectives on Strength-Dependent Dissolution Profiles and Biowaiver Approaches for Immediate Release (IR) Oral Tablets in New Drug Applications.

Dissolution profile comparisons are used by the pharmaceutical industry to assess the similarity in the dissolution characteristics of two formulations to decide whether the implemented changes, usually minor/moderate in nature, will have an impact on the in vitro/in vivo performance of the drug product. When similarity testing is applied to support the approval of lower strengths of the same formulation, the traditional approach for dissolution profile comparison is not always applicable for drug products exhibiting strength-dependent dissolution and may lead to incorrect conclusions about product performance. The objective of this article is to describe reasonable biopharmaceutic approaches for developing a biowaiver strategy for low solubility, proportionally similar/non-proportionally similar in composition immediate release drug products that exhibit strength-dependent dissolution profiles. The paths highlighted in the article include (1) approaches to address biowaiver requests, such as the use of multi-unit dissolution testing to account for sink condition differences between the higher and lower strengths; (2) the use of a single- vs. strength-dependent dissolution method; and (3) the use of single- vs. strength-dependent dissolution acceptance criteria. These approaches are cost- and time-effective and can avoid unnecessary bioequivalence studies.

Influence of ß-cyclodextrin on the Properties of Norfloxacin Form A.

Cyclodextrins are able to form host-guest complexes with hydrophobic molecules to result in the formation of inclusion complexes. The complex formation between norfloxacin form A and ß-cyclodextrin was studied by exploring its structure affinity relationship in an aqueous solution and in the solid state. Kneading, freeze-drying, and physical mixture methods were employed to prepare solid complexes of norfloxacin and ß-cyclodextrin. The solubility of norfloxacin significantly increased upon complexation with ß-cyclodextrin as demonstrated by a solubility isotherm of the AL type along with the results of an intrinsic dissolution study. The complexes were also characterized in the solid stated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, X-ray diffractometry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (ssNMR) spectrometry. The thermal analysis showed that the thermal stability of the drug is enhanced in the presence of ß-cyclodextrin. Finally, the microbiological studies showed that the complexes have better potency when compared with pure drug.

A biorelevant in vitro release/permeation system for oral transmucosal dosage forms.

This research describes the development and validation of a biorelevant in vitro release/permeation system to predict the in vivo performance of oral transmucosal dosage forms. The system is a biorelevant bidirectional transmucosal apparatus which allows better simulation of oral cavity physiological variables in comparison to compendial dissolution apparatuses and therefore may be a better predictor of in vivo behavior. The feasibility of the bidirectional apparatus was studied using smokeless tobacco (snus) as a model oral transmucosal product. In this research, nicotine release and permeation was investigated from commercially available snus using a modified USP IV flow-through apparatus, a commercially available vertical diffusion cell and a fabricated novel bidirectional transmucosal apparatus. The percent nicotine released/permeated was utilized as an input function for the prediction of in vivo plasma nicotine profiles by back calculation based on the Wagner-Nelson method. The prediction errors in C(max) and AUC(0-∞) with the USP IV flow-through device, vertical diffusion cell and novel apparatus were 4.03, 22.85 and 1.59 and -5.85, 5.85 and -9.27% respectively. This work demonstrated the suitability of the novel bidirectional transmucosal apparatus for predicting the in vivo behavior of oral transmucosal products.