ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This project examined the intermodal perception of temporal synchrony in 16 young children (ages 4 to 6 years) with autism compared to a group of children without impairments matched on adaptive age, and a group of children with other developmental disabilities matched on chronological and adaptive age. METHOD: A preferential looking paradigm was used, where participants viewed non-linguistic, simple linguistic or complex linguistic events on two screens displaying identical video tracks, but one offset from the other by 3 seconds, and with the single audio track matched to only one of the displays. RESULTS: As predicted, both comparison groups demonstrated significant non-random preferential looking to violations of temporal synchrony with linguistic and non-linguistic stimuli. However, the group with autism showed an impaired, chance level of responding, except when presented with non-linguistic stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: Several explanations are offered for this apparently autism-specific, language-specific pattern of responding to temporal synchrony, and potential developmental sequelae are discussed.
Subject(s)
Autistic Disorder/diagnosis , Developmental Disabilities/epidemiology , Discrimination, Psychological , Time Perception , Adaptation, Psychological , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Fixation, Ocular , Humans , Language Disorders/diagnosis , Language Disorders/epidemiology , Male , Videotape RecordingABSTRACT
The authors evaluated the hypothesis that controlled and automatic processes are opposite ends of a continuum of learning (e.g., R. M. Shiffrin & W. Schneider, 1977) vs. an alternative, concurrent emergence hypothesis (e.g., J. M. Bebko et al., 2003; G. Logan, 1989). The authors also measured potential positive transfer effects of learning from one motor task to another. Four experienced cascade jugglers and 5 novices learned to bounce juggle, practicing regularly for 5 weeks. The experienced jugglers showed positive transfer of learning, maintaining a lead of approximately 6-10 days over the novices, even as both groups automatized the new skill. Measures of automatic and controlled processing were positively correlated, indicating that those processes emerge concurrently. The authors present a model in which controlled and automatic processes emerge orthogonally.
Subject(s)
Automatism , Hand/physiology , Movement , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Transfer, Psychology , Visual Perception/physiology , Adult , Female , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
Previous researchers have reported autistic features in children with fragile X syndrome. We compared 21 children with pervasive developmental disorders (autism group) to 15 with fragile X syndrome on the Childhood Autism Rating Scale and the Reiss Scales for Children's Dual Diagnosis. The 7 children (47%) with fragile X who scored above the Childhood Autism Rating Scale cut-off (fragile X-autism group) were more impaired than the remaining children (fragile X-no autism) on Childhood Autism Rating Scale subscales related to emotion, visual and listening responses, and communication. The autism group's Reiss scores were higher than fragile X-no autism group, but not fragile X-autism group. Although the Childhood Autism Rating Scale identified almost 50% of children with fragile X as having autism, qualitative differences may exist in specific autistic-like behaviors between children with autism and children with fragile X.
Subject(s)
Autistic Disorder/psychology , Fragile X Syndrome/psychology , Adolescent , Autistic Disorder/complications , Autistic Disorder/diagnosis , Child , Child Behavior , Child, Preschool , Female , Fragile X Syndrome/complications , Fragile X Syndrome/diagnosis , Humans , Intellectual Disability/diagnosis , Intellectual Disability/etiology , Male , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
The learning patterns of 3-ball cascade juggling from acquisition until automaticity were examined in 10 participants. On the basis of outcome measures derived from 26 practice sessions and 4 periodic probe sessions, the authors differentiated participants into 3 distinct learning types: a proficient group, an emerging group, and a single late learner. The proficient group was distinguished by how rapidly they learned and automatized performance. Most interesting, an inverse response cost (i.e., performance boost) on the secondary task was found in the majority of proficient group members during the dual-task condition. The present results are discussed in relation to the P. L. Ackerman model (1987, 1988) of complex skill acquisition as is the significance of the inverse response cost finding.
