Factors affecting rehabilitation of infants with Central Coordination Disorders during a three-month-long observation.

BACKGROUND: Central coordination disorders (CCD) encompass various abnormalities observed in infants but early therapy may have an impact on their condition. The aim was to seek factors that may affect the early results of therapy of infants with CCD. METHODS: We analyzed the outcomes of a three-month period of rehabilitation of infants living with CCD. Children were treated at Non-public Specialist Healthcare Institution Medi-Reh in Kalisz in the period from 1 Jan 2014 to 31 Nov 2019. In our retrospective study results of three-month therapy of infants, aged 1 to 6 months, with CCD were analysed regards to the effectiveness and the potential impact of different factors. Therapy and assessment of children were conducted with the use of the Vojta method, which was performed during the first visit (WW) and the follow-up visit (after 3 months- 1WK). The analysis of the influence of various factors on the effect of therapy included: mother's age at the time of delivery, duration of breastfeeding, child APGAR, gestational age in which the child was born, sex of the child, birth weight, age of the child at WW, type of delivery, craniosacral therapy as an additive treatment. RESULTS: Based on the examination results from 66 medical records it was demonstrated that after active period of the therapy, improvement was observed in 54 (81.81%) (p=0.48) children (condition during WW versus 1WK among the group). The sole factor impacting improvement after 3 months was the age of the child at WW, when the child started therapy. This factor significantly (p=0.002) increased the chance of achieving improvement - by 3.2 times (OR= 3,2; CI= 95). No statistically significant differences were shown for the other studied factors. CONCLUSIONS: Prompt implementation of rehabilitation in children with CCD provides a better chance of improving their motor function. The rehabilitation should be started as soon as possible after the diagnosis is constituted.

Assessment of the level of anxiety and pain in women who do and do not attend childbirth classes during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Participation in childbirth classes is aimed at learning to cope with the anxiety that accompanies a woman during her pregnancy and childbirth. The aim of the study was to answer the question whether the lack of access to childbirth classes affected anxiety and perinatal pain in pregnant women who gave birth during the pandemic period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional survey-based study involved women who were pregnant during the lockdown period. The respondents were asked to fill in the following questionnaires: a personal questionnaire, the Polish version of the Delivery Fear Scale and the Numeric Rating Scale for the assessment of average and maximum pain experienced during the labour. The survey was completed within 24-72 hours after the birth of the child. The obtained questionnaires were divided into 2 groups based on the information concerning attending or not attending childbirth classes (divided into subgroups): group A - patients participated in childbirth classes, and group B - patients did not participate in childbirth classes. RESULTS: Groups were homogeneous in terms of age, weight, height, body mass index and week of gestation. Perception of anxiety did not differ between groups. There was a correlation between particular formulation of the Delivery Fear Scale and "week of gestation" variable. In the group of women who gave birth naturally without anesthesia, there were no significant differences between groups in terms of mean and maximum pain during labour. CONCLUSION: The level of anxiety and pain associated with childbirth is not modulated by childbirth classes during the pandemic period. There is s a correlation between particular formulation of the Delivery Fear Scale and "week of gestation" variable. In the group of women who gave birth naturally without anesthesia, there are no significant differences between groups in terms of mean and maximum pain during labour.

The Use of Medical and Non-Medical Services by Older Inpatients from Emergency vs. Chronic Departments, during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in Poland.

The COVID-19 pandemic has forced numerous changes in medical care. The monitoring of current needs and problems among the elderly in health care facilities seems to be essential. This study aims to assess the difference in terms of the use of medical and non-medical services before planned or emergency hospitalisation by the older population during the strict lockdown period due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Poland. The study used the FIMA (Fragebogen zur Inanspruchnahme medizinischer und nicht-medizinischer Versorgungsleistungen im Alter) questionnaire. Patients admitted on a planned basis (n = 61) were on average 4 years younger, self-administered the questionnaire more frequently and used the services of different types of therapists. Patients admitted on an emergency basis (n = 60) were more likely to visit general practitioners and other specialists and used the carer's allowance benefits. In the case of the elderly, emergency hospitalisation during the pandemic is more frequently preceded by seeking outpatient care in specialists in various fields, covered by insurance. The chronically ill use the services of various therapists while awaiting hospitalisation, usually not covered by health insurance. For both groups, the age > 73 years is critical for the use of assisting means and completing the self-administered questionnaire, which can be used in planning the health care in these patients.

Knowledge and selected variables as determinants of the quality of life and general health of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an incurable disease resulting in progressive disability, which is associated with the loss of productivity and the inability to earn money, which might lead to a financial burden on the patient's family. Undoubtedly, the clinical picture of the disease and its consequences lead to the reduction of the quality of life. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of selected factors on the subjective assessment of the quality of life and general health of patients with RA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted among 270 patients with RA treated at the Department of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine. The quality of life and general health were assessed with the use of the SF-36 and the GHQ-30 questionnaires. RESULTS: In the study group, a statistically significant correlation between the results of the SF-36 and the GHQ-30 questionnaires was observed. It has been shown that the level of role limitations due to physical health problems (RP) is mostly affected by interpersonal relationships based on GHQ-30 questionnaire (p = 0.002), general health (GHQ-30) (p = 0.001) and subjective health condition (SF-36) (p < 0.001). In contrast, general health (GHQ-30) is positively affected by education (p = 0.003) and professional activity (p = 0.001), and negatively affected by a positive family history of RA (p = 0.002), frequent hospitalization (p = 0.008) and poor subjective health condition (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: People with poor subjective health condition are characterized by more limited activity due to physical health and lower general health condition. General health (GHQ-30) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis is influenced by education, place of residence, professional work, family history of RA and subjective health status.

[The usefulness of the latest diagnostic and therapeutic criteria ACR/EULAR in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis]. / Przydatnosc najnowszych kryteriów diagnostycznych i terapeutycznych ACR/EULAR w leczeniu reumatoidalnego zapalenia stawów.

In Poland nearly 400 thousand people are treated for rheumatoid arthritis and each year there are about 8 to 16 thousand new patients with this disease. Rheumatoid diseases constitute and enormous health problem which statistically encounters every the third person of the population. The condition for effective treatment of rheumatoid arthritis is early diagnosis and aggressive treatment of disease. So it became necessary to develop in 2010, the new ACR/ EULAR, much simpler than the ACR criteria of 1987, intended to enable the rapid implementation of appropriate intensive treatment, both conventional disease modifying drugs and biologicals.