A new, easy, and rapid high-throughput detection method for the common GJB2 (CX26), 35delG mutation.

GJB2 (Gap Junction protein beta type 2; Connexin 26, CX26) is known for its contribution to nonsyndromic recessive deafness (NSRD). One particular mutation, 35delG, a deletion of one guanine from a stretch of six leading to a frame shift early in the gene, has a high prevalence in populations from European descent. 35delG testing therefore has become a standard test in genetic diagnostic laboratories. Most of the currently available methods for the detection of 35delG are relatively time consuming, and not suited for high-throughput diagnostic testing. Within this paper we present a real-time PCR genotyping assay based on melting curve analysis, requiring only a single preparation step before the actual analysis. The assay was optimized on a panel of 48 samples with known 35delG genotypes and subsequently tested using a large Belgian population (N = 460) with unknown 35delG status. For the latter set of samples, real-time PCR results were validated with SNAPShot, an assay used in our laboratory for diagnostic purposes. The real-time PCR genotyping method has proven to be highly reliable, rapid, cost-effective, and suitable for high-throughput screening. We believe that this genetic test for 35delG will find widespread applications in the DNA diagnostic field.

Contribution of the N-acetyltransferase 2 polymorphism NAT2*6A to age-related hearing impairment.

BACKGROUND: Age-related hearing impairment (ARHI) is the most common sensory impairment in older people, affecting 50% of those aged 80 years. The proportion of older people is increasing in the general population, and as a consequence, the number of people affected with ARHI is growing. ARHI is a complex disorder, with both environmental and genetic factors contributing to the disease. The first studies to elucidate these genetic factors were recently performed, resulting in the identification of the first two susceptibility genes for ARHI, NAT2 and KCNQ4. METHODS: In the present study, the association between ARHI and polymorphisms in genes that contribute to the defence against reactive oxygen species, including GSTT1, GSTM1 and NAT2, was tested. Samples originated from seven different countries and were combined into two test population samples, the general European population and the Finnish population. Two distinct phenotypes for ARHI were studied, Z(low) and Z(high), representing hearing in the low and high frequencies, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed for single polymorphisms (GSTM1, GSTT1, NAT2*5A, NAT2*6A, and NAT2*7A), haplotypes, and gene-environment and gene-gene interactions. RESULTS: We found an association between ARHI and GSTT1 and GSTM1 in the Finnish population sample, and with NAT2*6A in the general European population sample. The latter finding replicates previously published data. CONCLUSION: As replication is considered the ultimate proof of true associations in the study of complex disorders, this study provides further support for the involvement of NAT2*6A in ARHI.

Prevalence of tinnitus and audiometric shape.

OBJECTIVES: Studies of tinnitus are often conducted on patient populations presenting for treatment. It is, however, difficult to generalise prevalence numbers and aetiological results from these studies to a healthy, elderly population. The first aim of our study was to determine the prevalence of tinnitus in an otologically screened population between 55 and 65 years old. Secondly, both prevalence and the specific characteristics of tinnitus were compared in subjects with either a flat audiogram, a high-frequency gently sloping audiogram or a high-frequency steeply sloping audiogram. METHODS: 1147 subjects (549 males and 598 females) were recruited through population registers and underwent thorough clinical and audiological examinations. Subjects who reported tinnitus in the general questionnaire about medical history and environmental exposure were invited to complete an additional questionnaire on tinnitus history. RESULTS: The prevalence of tinnitus was 19.3% according to the general questionnaire on medical health and environmental exposure and 11.8% according to the additional detailed tinnitus-specific questionnaire. Furthermore, our results indicate that gender has a significant effect (tinnitus is more common in males than in females), as does audiometric configuration (tinnitus is more common in subjects with a high-frequency steeply sloping audiogram than in subjects with a flat audiogram). Both effects were significant in noise-/solvent-exposed subjects, as well as in non-exposed subjects. Finally, comparison of "tinnitus characteristics" in subjects categorised by audiogram configuration revealed significant differences in loudness, pitch, temporal variability and family history of tinnitus.

Familial aggregation of tinnitus: a European multicentre study.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Tinnitus is a common condition affecting approximately 20% of the older population. There is increasing evidence that changes in the central auditory system following cochlear malfunctioning are responsible for tinnitus. To date, few investigators have studied the influence of genetic factors on tinnitus. The present report investigates the presence of a familial effect in tinnitus subjects. METHODS: In a European multicentre study, 198 families were recruited in seven European countries. Each family had at least 3 siblings. Subjects were screened for causes of hearing loss other than presbyacusis by clinical examination and a questionnaire. The presence of tinnitus was evaluated with the question "Nowadays, do you ever get noises in your head or ear (tinnitus) which usually last longer than five minutes". Familial aggregation was tested using three methods: a mixed model approach, calculating familial correlations, and estimating the risk of a subject having tinnitus if the disorder is present in another family member. RESULTS: All methods demonstrated a significant familial effect for tinnitus. The effect persisted after correction for the effect of other risk factors such as hearing loss, gender and age. The size of the familial effect is smaller than that for age-related hearing impairment, with a familial correlation of 0.15. CONCLUSION: The presence of a familial effect for tinnitus opens the door to specific studies that can determine whether this effect is due to a shared familial environment or the involvement of genetic factors. Subsequent association studies may result in the identification of the factors responsible. In addition, more emphasis should be placed on the effect of role models in the treatment of tinnitus.