ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The repair of anterior mitral leaflet prolapse is known to be challenging. Hence, the study aim was to compare the mid-term results of anterior leaflet prolapse (ALP) using chordal transposition with results obtained using chordal replacement with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) sutures. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2012, a total of 96 consecutive patients (mean age 62 years) with ALP underwent mitral valve repair at the authors' institution. Surgery involved either chordal transposition from the posterior to the anterior leaflet (n = 67), or chordal replacement using ePTFE sutures (n = 29). Clinical, operative and follow up data were recorded prospectively for each patient. The follow up was 100% complete (mean 3.4 years; range 0 to 12.9 years). RESULTS: Mitral valve repair was accomplished in all patients, with no operative mortality. The durations of cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp were significantly longer in the chordal replacement group. Actuarial overall survival at one, five and 10 years was 95 ± 3%, 87 ± 5% and 82 ± 7% versus 89 ± 6%, 89 ± 6% and 89 ± 6% in the chordal transposition and chordal replacement groups, respectively (p = 0.84). Freedom from reoperation in the two groups at five years was 95 ± 3% and 91 ± 7%, respectively (p = 0.24). The recurrence of moderate or severe mitral regurgitation (MR) (grade ≤2+) and of severe (grade ≤3+) MR was significantly higher in patients who underwent chordal replacement compared to chordal transposition (p = 0.04 and p = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Provided that chordal quality is preserved, chordal transposition is easier and quicker to achieve for ALP repair, and is also durable in the mid term. Chordal replacement offers a satisfying durability even if the recurrence of severe MR appears to be higher. Preferably, both surgical techniques should be mastered to allow valve repair when anatomic conditions prevent chordal transposition.
