Ultrasound Use by Upper Extremity Surgeons in 2020: A Survey of ASSH Members.

BACKGROUND: The use of musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) among hand surgeons appears to be increasing. The purpose of this study was to determine the utilization patterns and attitudes regarding US among American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) members in 2020 as well as the changes in usage patterns since a previous survey in 2015. METHODS: In 2020, an updated and expanded 27-question survey was distributed to 4852 members of the ASSH. Questions assessed respondent demographics, training, and practice patterns, and access, utilization, training, and opinions pertaining to US. RESULTS: A total of 418 surveys (8.6%) were analyzed. Compared to 2015, there was an increase in the percentage of respondents using US for diagnostic purposes (51%-68%), as well as having personal access to US machines (43% to 58%). US use to assist in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome increased from 19% to 27%. The most common reason for using US was convenience and practice efficiency, while the most common reasons for not using US was no machine access. In 2020, 33% of respondents performed US-guided injections. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to 2015, the majority of responding upper extremity surgeons now have personal access to US machines. Utilization of diagnostic US appears to be increasing, and two-thirds of respondents believed that US use will continue to increase among upper extremity surgeons.

Comparison of Borderline Ultrasound and Nerve Conduction Studies for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Choosing cutoff values for nerve conduction studies (NCS) and ultrasound cross-sectional area (CSA) in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is critical in determining the diagnostic accuracy of the tests. The goals of this study were to: (1) determine the sensitivity and specificity of various electrodiagnostic and ultrasound threshold values for diagnosis of CTS; and (2) determine the number of hands that underwent NCS and ultrasound that were within 10% of threshold values. METHODS: A total of 309 hands of 235 patients were included in this study. Diagnosis of median neuropathy was made based on NCS by the independent physician performing the NCS. Criteria analyzed included distal motor latency of 4.4+ ms, distal sensory latency of 3.6+ ms, difference in median-ulnar mixed nerve palmar latency of 0.4+ ms, and CSA of the median nerve of 10+ mm2. RESULTS: Median neuropathy was diagnosed in 235 hands, whereas 74 hands were found not to have median neuropathy. Overall, 141 hands (46%) had at least 1 of the 3 electrodiagnostic variables within 10% of the diagnostic cutoff values, and 137 hands (44%) had a median nerve CSA within 10% of 10 mm2. By performing ultrasound in addition to NCS for each patient, an additional 65 hands (21%) had a definitive diagnosis on at least 1 of the 2 diagnostic modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound and NCS yielded a similar number of patients within 10% of their diagnostic threshold values. When used together, the number of patients with a nonborderline diagnosis on at least 1 diagnostic modality was increased substantially.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings After Elbow Dislocation: A Descriptive Study.

BACKGROUND: The elbow is one of the most commonly dislocated joints, and dislocation is usually accompanied with an assortment of soft tissue injuries. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze and describe the patterns of ligamentous, tendinous, and muscular injuries in patients with an acute elbow dislocation and subsequent magnetic resonance image (MRI) evaluation. METHODS: From 2008 to 2020, 235 patients clinically diagnosed with an elbow dislocation were seen in the department, of which only 19 underwent an MRI of the affected elbow. Twelve patients met inclusion criteria, and MRIs were evaluated by both a radiologist and an upper extremity orthopedic surgeon. Magnetic resonance images were assessed for injury to the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL); radial collateral ligament (RCL); lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL); common flexor and extensor tendons; biceps, brachialis, and triceps tendons; fracture; and joint effusion. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance imaging findings included the following: UCL was injured in 11 of 12 patients; RCL was injured in 9 of 12 patients; LUCL was injured in 9 of 12 patients; common flexor tendon was injured in 11 of 12 patients; and common extensor tendon was injured in 9 of 12 elbows. The biceps, brachialis, and triceps tendons showed injury in 1 of 12, 2 of 12, and 2 of 12 elbows, respectively. Four elbows had at least 1 fracture present, whereas 8 demonstrated an effusion. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, injuries to the UCL and common flexor tendon were most common. Although ligamentous injuries are exceedingly common in elbow dislocations, large studies of MRI findings prove difficult due to MRI costs.

Ultrasound Measurement Error and Its Implications for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Diagnosis.

Background: Ultrasound (US) measurement of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of peripheral nerves has been validated as a method for diagnosing peripheral nerve compression; however, the accuracy of US measurements and variation among examiners have not been well established. The purpose of this study was to determine the percent error from a known measurement among multiple US examiners using a gel phantom model. Methods: A US phantom gel, with 2 embedded, premeasured cylindrical objects, was constructed, and 9 residents, fellows, and attending physicians with upper-extremity US experience were recruited to use US to measure the CSA of each object. Percent error was calculated based on the premeasured value of each object, which was measured using digital calipers, and was calculated using the formula for CSA of a cylinder (A = pi × r2) prior to insertion into the gel phantom. Results: The mean percent error for examiners' CSA measurements was 9.0% ± 4.7% (range, 1.6%-17.0%). There was a greater mean percent error for the smaller measured object compared with the larger one. There was a very minimal decline in percent error with increase in years of training experience (slope = -0.029, R2 = 0.0002). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that US examiners were able to measure CSAs of premeasured objects with approximately 10% error. When considering the use of US for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome, a cutoff value of 10 mm2 is often used, and therefore in cases where measurements are within 10% of the diagnostic threshold, caution should be exercised in interpreting the results.

Prognostic Value of Ultrasound Imaging of the Median Nerve in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Background: Ultrasound has been well established as a diagnostic modality for carpal tunnel syndrome, but its prognostic utility has not been deeply investigated. Few studies, showing contradictory results, exist investigating ultrasound results as a predictor of patient outcomes. Methods: Patients with ultrasound measurement of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve who completed the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) and followed up after surgery were included in the study. A total of 199 wrists from 172 patients met the inclusion criteria. Preoperative CSA of the median nerve at the wrist was compared with change in BCTQ at various follow-up times postoperatively. Results: The BCTQ score was found on average to decrease for patients after surgery at all 3 follow-up times. There was a larger decrease in the preoperative BCTQ with each progressive follow-up time, with the largest change of 1.43 points coming at 6+ months. The average change in BCTQ at each follow-up time was found to be greater than the minimal clinically important difference. The greatest R2 for preoperative CSA compared with change in BCTQ was 0.0552 for the 6+ month visits. No specific CSA value or range above or below which patients have better postoperative outcomes was found. Conclusions: Higher preoperative CSA, signifying worse carpal tunnel severity, showed almost no correlation with better outcomes after carpal tunnel release surgery as measured by improvement in patient-reported outcome scores.

Surgical Management of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fracture-Dislocations: A Review of Outcomes.

Background: Treatment of proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) fracture-dislocations is difficult given the potential long-term complications of the involved finger and entire hand. Several surgical methods have been utilized for management of these injuries, none of which have shown consistently favorable results. The purpose of this systematic review of the literature is to report the post-operative outcomes of multiple treatment modalities for PIPJ fracture-dislocations in various studies. Methods: A literature review of PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed for all articles on PIPJ fracture-dislocations. Outcomes of interest included PIPJ range of motion, grip strength (% of contralateral hand), and quick disabilities of arm, shoulder, hand (QuickDASH). Articles were distributed into 5 groups by surgical method: open reduction, percutaneous fixation, dynamic external fixation, extension-block pinning, and hemi-hamate arthroplasty. Results: Forty-eight of 1679 total screened articles were included. The weighted means of post-operative range of motion (ROM; degrees) at final follow-up were open reduction 84.7 (n = 146), percutaneous fixation 86.5 (n = 32), dynamic external fixation 81.7 (n = 389), extension-block pinning 83.6 (n = 85), and hemi-hamate arthroplasty 79.3 (n = 52). Dorsal fracture-dislocations, regardless of surgical method, had an average ROM of 83.2 (n = 321), grip strength 91% (n = 132), and QuickDASH of 6.6 (n = 59) while pilon injuries had an average ROM of 80.2 (n = 48), grip strength 100% (n = 13), and QuickDASH of 11.4 (n = 13). Conclusion: Percutaneous fixation yielded the highest post-operative ROM at final follow-up while extension-block pinning resulted in the greatest grip strength. While dorsal fracture-dislocations produced higher average ROM and lower QuickDASH score, pilon fractures produced a higher grip strength. No treatment method or fracture type yielded consistently better outcomes than another.

The Sensitivity and Specificity of Nerve Conduction Studies for Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

Background: The utility of nerve conduction studies (NCS) for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) has continued to be a subject of debate. Proponents of NCS assume a high sensitivity and specificity; however, many are unaware of the actual literature on this topic and the cutoff values commonly used for diagnosis. The purpose of this systematic review of the literature is to report the sensitivity and specificity of NCS for diagnosis of CTS in various studies. Methods: A literature review of PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed for all articles on NCS for diagnosis of CTS. The outcome of interest was the sensitivity and/or specificity of the NCS distal motor latency (DML) or distal sensory latency (DSL) cutoff value used to diagnose CTS in each study. Results: A total of 3066 total articles were screened and 21 were included in the review after assessment by two independent reviewers. The mean cut-off value for DSL was 3.37 ms (range 2.8-4 ms) and the mean cutoff value for DML was 4.28 ms (range 3.8-4.6 ms). Weighted mean DSL sensitivity was 73.4% and weighted mean DSL specificity was 93.6%. Weighted mean DML sensitivity was 56.2% and weighted mean DML specificity was 95.8%. Conclusions: There is significant variation in the cutoff values used for both DSL and DML. The wide range of cut-off values makes it difficult to interpret the literature, and there is a lack of high-quality studies with control groups using a priori cut-off values for diagnosis.

Electrodiagnostic Studies and Ultrasound Cross-Sectional Area of the Median Nerve in Patients With Isolated Cervical Radiculopathy.

Purpose: Although the literature has shown that the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the carpal tunnel on ultrasound is enlarged in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, it does not provide information regarding whether proximal nerve pathology, such as that seen in cervical radiculopathy, increases the CSA of the median nerve. Methods: In this study, 15 patients were enrolled who had a clinical diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy but not carpal tunnel syndrome. All patients underwent electrodiagnostic studies and ultrasound measurement of the CSA of the median nerve. Results: Increased median nerve CSA was seen in 1 of 15 patients (7%). Positive findings of cervical radiculopathy were found in 7 patients (47%) by electrodiagnostic studies. Conclusions: In patients clinically diagnosed with isolated cervical radiculopathy, the vast majority have normal median nerve CSA measured on ultrasound. Type of study/level of evidence: Prognostic IV.

Changes in Nerve Conduction Studies After Distal Radius Fracture Fixation Using a Volar Approach and Locked Plate.

Purpose: To determine whether there are changes in nerve conduction studies (NCS) of the median nerve after distal radius fracture (DRF) and to determine how operative fixation through a volar approach with a locking plate contributes to nerve conduction changes. We hypothesized that a considerable percentage of patients would have electrodiagnostic evidence of median neuropathy at the wrist after fracture, but fixation with a volar locked plate would not worsen the electrodiagnostic findings. Methods: This was a prospective cohort study of 14 neurologically asymptomatic patients who underwent surgical treatment of an isolated DRF using a volar plate. All patients underwent surgery within 2 weeks of injury. On the day of surgery and at the 6-week follow-up, patients were clinically examined, Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire was completed, and patients underwent NCS using a handheld device with the unaffected limb, which was used as a comparison. Preoperative and postoperative nerve function were compared with the unaffected limb as a baseline. Results: Patients without symptoms after DRF had a 28% incidence of prolonged latencies compared with reference values for the device used. Distal sensory latencies of the median nerve were 3.64 ± 0.32 ms in the unaffected arm, 3.76 ± 0.70 ms before surgery, and 3.81 ± 0.52 ms after surgery. Distal motor latencies of the median nerve were 3.91 ± 0.59, 3.60 ± 0.68, and 3.88 ± 0.36 ms in respective arms and time points. Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores improved from 77 before surgery to 46 at 6 weeks. Conclusions: Asymptomatic patients may satisfy nerve conduction criteria for median neuropathy at the wrist after DRF; however, open reduction and treatment with a volar locked plate has no significant effect on NCS findings. Type of study/level of evidence: Prognostic II.

Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound in CTS in Diabetic Versus Nondiabetic Populations.

Purpose: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a well-known risk factor for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, few studies have compared differences in the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve in patients with and without DM. The purpose of this study was to compare the utility of ultrasound for the diagnosis of CTS in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients. Method: A total of 248 hands of 155 patients were evaluated: 154 hands belonged to non-DM patients with CTS, 80 to DM patients with CTS, 13 patients with DM but no CTS, and 51 patients without DM or CTS. All hands underwent ultrasonography of the median nerve at the wrist for determination of CSA; patients completed a CTS Symptom Severity Scale and Functional Status Scale for each hand. Results: Average CSA (mm2) of non-DM patients with CTS was 11.25 whereas the average in DM patients with CTS was 12.23 (P = .17). Cross-sectional area of 9.5 or greater was the most powerful predictor of CTS in patients without DM, and CSA of 10.5 or greater in patients with DM. Conclusions: Cross-sectional area of the median nerve was similar for patients with and without DM; however, cutoff values for positive diagnosis may need to be adjusted in patients with DM. Ultrasonography of the wrist is a valuable resource for diagnosing CTS in patients with and without DM. Type of study/level of evidence: Diagnostic II.