Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Turk J Pediatr ; 63(2): 200-205, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33929109

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and its resistance to multiple antibiotics has become a serious challenge since the early 2000s. Especially, community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) infections that appear mainly as skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) tend to increase worldwide. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the trends in the frequency of SSTIs due to community-acquired S. aureus among children. METHODS: All children with SSTIs caused by culture positive community-acquired S. aureus during the period from 2013 to 2018 were included in this study. Data of the outpatients were collected from medical records. Annual alteration in frequencies of CA-MRSA and community-acquired methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (CAMSSA) were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 112 cases was evaluated. Of these, 35 (31.25%) were CA-MRSA. The rates of CA-MRSA had emerged from an increasing annual frequency of 9.5 cases per 10,000 SSTIs as of 2014 to 96.8 cases per 10,000 SSTIs in 2018. The ratio of cases with CA-MRSA to cases with CA-MSSA was 0 - 0.09 in two years of the study period and increased to a maximum ratio of 0.6 - 0.72 in the last two years. Consequently, the frequency of S. aureus in cases with SSTIs was significantly higher in 2016 - 2018 compared to the initial study period within the years of 2013-2015 [p < 0.001, relative risk increase: 7 (2.6-28.7) for CA-MRSA and p=0.002, relative risk increase: 2.1 (1.2-3.5)]. Cases with CA-MRSA increased approximately eight-fold during the six-year-study period. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of CA-MRSA in SSTIs among children increased significantly compared to CA-MSSA. The clinical impact of this increase should be evaluated, especially in patients with SSTI who are unresponsive to empirical treatment.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Soft Tissue Infections , Staphylococcal Infections , Staphylococcal Skin Infections , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy , Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Soft Tissue Infections/drug therapy , Soft Tissue Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus aureus
3.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 336, 2020 Apr 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32316939

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Central line bundle programs were found to be effective in decreasing central line-associated bloodstream infection rates in pediatric cancer patients with ports. However, cost-effectiveness studies of central line bundle programs in pediatric cancer patients are limited, and most available data are from intensive care unit or adult studies. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study spanning 6 years, comprehensive assessment of total health care costs attributable to CLABSI's associated with ports between two periods. RESULTS: This cross-sectional study was carried out in the pediatric hematology-oncology ward of Dr. Behçet Uz Children's Hospital from 1 August November 2011 to 31 July 2017. The CLABSI rates decreased significantly from 8.31 CLABSIs to 3.04 per 1000 central line days (p < 0.001). In the pre-bundle period, total attributable costs spent for of patients with CLABSI were $130,661, and in the bundle period, total attributable costs spent for patients with CLABSI were $116,579. Within bundle implantation, 71 potential CLABSI were prevented, which saved an additional $208,977. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that central line bundles decreases not only the CLABSI rate but also decreases attributable costs due to CLABSI. Expenses spent for bundle elements, were covered by savings by preventing CLABSI with higher costs.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheterization, Central Venous/instrumentation , Central Venous Catheters/microbiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Syringes , Adult , Child , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Care Costs , Health Resources , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Neoplasms
4.
J Vasc Access ; 20(6): 604-607, 2019 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30722715

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The optimal scrubbing time for the disinfection of the surface of needleless connectors has not been determined. The evidence for successful needleless connector decontamination with 70% isopropyl alcohol ranges from 5 to 60 s. The aim of this prospective study was to identify colonization on the external surface of needleless connectors on central venous catheters and measure the efficiency of 15 s of scrubbing with 70% alcohol. METHOD: A total of 31 patients were included. Samples were collected adhering to aseptic no-touch technique policies. Two samples were collected from the injectable surface of the needleless connector with sterile sodium chloride 0.9% moistened and a dry swab from the same site. Then the surface was scrubbed with alcohol 70% for 15 s for disinfection and second couples of samples for the cultures were taken after disinfection. FINDINGS: A total of 420 swabs were obtained. The number of colonization (equal or higher than 15 CFU/plate) was present on 21 of the needleless connectors (20.0%). Coagulase-negative staphylococci was responsible for all the colonization. After disinfection for 15 s, no isolation exceeding 1 CFU/plate was present. CONCLUSION: Scrubbing for 15 s with 70% alcohol was found to be successful at elimination of colonization of the surface of needleless connector even in high microorganism counts.


Subject(s)
2-Propanol , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Central Venous Catheters/microbiology , Disinfectants , Disinfection/methods , Equipment Contamination , Staphylococcus/growth & development , Bacterial Load , Catheter-Related Infections/microbiology , Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Prospective Studies , Surface Properties , Time Factors
5.
Am J Infect Control ; 47(4): 387-390, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30502109

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Central line-associated bloodstream infection is the most common infection associated with healthcare in preterm infants. The purpose of this 18-month cross-sectional study was to evaluate the effectiveness of bundle applications in the prevention of umbilical venous catheter (UVC)-associated bloodstream infections. METHODS: This study included patients in whom UVCs were inserted and who were diagnosed with central line-associated bloodstream infection between July 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. During the second 9-month period of the study (April 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017), bundles were implemented. RESULTS: In the prebundle period, 589 patients were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit, and 6,769 hospitalization days and 485 UVC days were recorded. Similarly, during the bundle period, 508 patients were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit, and 7,789 hospitalization days and 508 UVC days were recorded. The UVC-associated bloodstream infection rate was 12.4 per 1,000 catheter days in the prebundle period and decreased to 3.9 per 1,000 catheter days in the bundle period. Thus, after introducing bundle applications, the rate of infection decreased by 68% (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that bundle application effectively reduced UVC-associated bloodstream infection.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Patient Care Bundles/methods , Sepsis/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Male , Treatment Outcome
6.
Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis ; 10(1): e2018055, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30210748

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Healthcare-associated infections results in increased health care costs and mortality. There are limited studies concerning the distribution of the etiologic agents and the resistance patterns of the microorganisms causing healthcare-associated urinary tract infections (HA-UTI) in pediatric settings. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of pathogens causing HA-UTI in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Isolates from 138 children with UTI who were hospitalized in pediatric, neonatal and pediatric surgery intensive care units were reviewed. RESULTS: Most common isolated organism was Klebsiella pneumoniae (34.1%) and Escherichia coli (26.8%). Among the Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Meropenem and imipenem resistance rates were 46.2% and 38.5%. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production was present in 48 Klebsiella species (82.8%). Among ESBL positive Klebsiella species, the rate of meropenem and imipenem resistance was 18.8%, and ertapenem resistance was 45.9%. Extended spectrum beta-lactamase production was present in 27 (72.9%) Escherichia coli species. Among ESBL positive E. coli, the rate of meropenem and imipenem resistance was 7.4%, and ertapenem resistance was 14.8. CONCLUSIONS: Emerging meropenem resistance in P. aeruginosa, higher rates of ertapenem resistance in ESBL positive ones in E. coli and Klebsiella species in pediatric nosocomial UTI are important notifying signs for superbug infections.

7.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 19(1): 58-61, Jan-Feb/2015. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-741233

ABSTRACT

Background: Vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization has been reported to increase the risk of developing infections, including bloodstream infections. Aim: In this study, we aimed to share our experience with the vancomycin-resistant enterococci bloodstream infections following gastrointestinal vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization in pediatric population during a period of 18 months. Method: A retrospective cohort of children admitted to a 400-bed tertiary teaching hospital in Izmir, Turkey whose vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization was newly detected during routine surveillances for gastrointestinal vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization during the period of January 2009 and December 2012 were included in this study. All vancomycin-resistant enterococci isolates found within 18 months after initial detection were evaluated for evidence of infection. Findings: Two hundred and sixteen patients with vancomycin-resistant enterococci were included in the study. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization was detected in 136 patients (62.3%) while they were hospitalized at intensive care units; while the remaining majority (33.0%) were hospitalized at hematology-oncology department. Vancomycinresistant enterococci bacteremia was present only in three (1.55%) patients. All these patients were immunosuppressed due to human immunodeficiency virus (one patient) and intensive chemotherapy (two patients). Conclusion: In conclusion, our study found that 1.55% of vancomycin-resistant enterococcicolonized children had developed vancomycin-resistant enterococci bloodstream infection among the pediatric intensive care unit and hematology/oncology patients; according to our findings, we suggest that immunosupression is the key point for developing vancomycinresistant enterococci bloodstream infections. .


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Bacteremia/microbiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/immunology , Cohort Studies , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/immunology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/immunology , Immunocompromised Host , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
8.
Braz J Infect Dis ; 19(1): 58-61, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25529366

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization has been reported to increase the risk of developing infections, including bloodstream infections. AIM: In this study, we aimed to share our experience with the vancomycin-resistant enterococci bloodstream infections following gastrointestinal vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization in pediatric population during a period of 18 months. METHOD: A retrospective cohort of children admitted to a 400-bed tertiary teaching hospital in Izmir, Turkey whose vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization was newly detected during routine surveillances for gastrointestinal vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization during the period of January 2009 and December 2012 were included in this study. All vancomycin-resistant enterococci isolates found within 18 months after initial detection were evaluated for evidence of infection. FINDINGS: Two hundred and sixteen patients with vancomycin-resistant enterococci were included in the study. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization was detected in 136 patients (62.3%) while they were hospitalized at intensive care units; while the remaining majority (33.0%) were hospitalized at hematology-oncology department. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci bacteremia was present only in three (1.55%) patients. All these patients were immunosuppressed due to human immunodeficiency virus (one patient) and intensive chemotherapy (two patients). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our study found that 1.55% of vancomycin-resistant enterococci-colonized children had developed vancomycin-resistant enterococci bloodstream infection among the pediatric intensive care unit and hematology/oncology patients; according to our findings, we suggest that immunosupression is the key point for developing vancomycin-resistant enterococci bloodstream infections.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/microbiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci , Adolescent , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/immunology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/immunology , Female , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/immunology , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...