ABSTRACT
AIM: To assess frequency of unstable angina due to restenosis after percutaneous angioplasty of venous grafts and to elucidate risk factors of its development. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Percutaneous interventions were successfully performed in 100 out of 106 patients with venous graft stenoses. These patients were followed up for 17+/-11 (maximum 36) months. RESULTS: Unstable angina due to venous graft restenosis developed in 24% of patients. Patients with unstable angina compared with those without were characterized by higher frequency of hyperlipidemia (83 vs. 51%, respectively, p=0.032), lower rate of stenting (46 and 72%, respectively, p=0.032), greater residual stenosis (15+/-13 and 9+/-8%, respectively, p=0.008). At multifactorial regression analysis the following factors were significant predictors of unstable angina: hyperlipidemia (odds ratio [OR] 3.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64-8.39), and residual stenosis after intervention (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, p=0.04). In a subgroup of patients with hyperlipidemia there was a tendency to greater rate of unstable angina among patients not taking statins compared with users of statin (50 and 29%, respectively, p=0.083). CONCLUSION: Unstable angina developed in (1/4) of patients after balloon dilatation of venous grafts and hyperlipidemia was its most powerful predictor.
Subject(s)
Recurrence , Saphenous Vein , Angina, Unstable , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Humans , PrognosisABSTRACT
AIM: To elucidate factors related to acute vessel closure (AVC) after transluminal coronary intervention. METHODS: From population of 10439 patients subjected to transluminal coronary intervention 2 groups were formed: with (n=885) and without (n=885) acute vessel closure (AVC). Twenty five clinical, angiographical and procedural characteristics of patients of these 2 groups were included into mono and multifactorial logistic regression analysis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The following factors were univariate predictors of acute vessel closure: smoking [odds ratio (OR) 1.42], unstable angina (OR=2.130, acute myocardial infarction within previous 24 hours (OR 2.76), cardiogenic shock (OR 4.31), urgent procedure (OR 1.94), eccentric stenosis (OR 1.67), calcified lesion (OR 2.21), preexisting thrombosis (OR 3.79), lacerated complicated stenosis (OR 2.02), tortuous lesion (OR 1.35), low operator experience (OR 3.37), balloon angioplasty as sole procedure (OR 1.66), concomitant rheolytic thrombectomy (OR 1.95), urgent stenting (OR 1.45). Elective stenting significantly lowered risk of acute vessel thrombosis. Multifactorial step-up analysis selected the following independent predictors of AVC: smoking, acute myocardial infarction within previous 24 hours, cardiogenic shock, preexisting thrombosis, lacerated complicated stenosis, and concomitant rheolytic thrombus extraction. Thus only elective stenting significantly reduced risk of AVC.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Coronary Angiography , Angina, Unstable , Coronary Vessels , Humans , StentsABSTRACT
In-stent restenosis (ISR), when treated with balloon angioplasty (PTCA) alone, has an angiographic recurrence rate of 30-85%. Ablating the hypertrophic neointimal tissue prior to PTCA is an attractive alternative, however late outcomes of such treatment have not been fully determined. This multicenter case control study assessed angiographic and clinical outcomes of 137 consecutive procedures in 125 patients treated for ISR with either PTCA alone (n = 58) or excimer laser assisted coronary angioplasty (ELCA, n = 67). Demographics were similar. Lesions selected for ELCA compared with those selected for \PTCA were longer (17.1+/-9.9 mm vs. 13.6+/-9.1 mm; p=0,034), more complex (ACC/AHA type C: 36,5% vs. 14,3%; p=0,006), and with reduced antegrade flow (TIMI flow < 3: 18,9% vs. 4,8%; p = 0,025). ELCA- and PTCA treated patients had similar rates of procedural success (98,5 and 98,3%, respectively, p=1,0), major clinical complications (3,0% and 8,6%; respectively, NS), major cardiac events at 1 year (37,3 and 46,6%. respectively, NS), and target lesion revascularization (32,8 and. 34,5%; respectively, NS). These data suggest that ELCA in patients with complex in-stent restenosis is as safe and effective as PTCA. Despite higher lesion complexity in ELCA-treated patients, no increase in event rates was observed.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Angioplasty, Balloon, Laser-Assisted , Coronary Restenosis/surgery , Stents , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Restenosis/diagnostic imaging , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
AIM: An open non-randomized trial was initiated to assess clinical and angiographic results of using the coronary stent "Ephesos" in 457 patients with stable or unstable angina pectoris and native coronary affections. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 268 stents have been implanted in 231 patients with stable angina (SA) and 271 stents--in 226 patients with unstable angina (UA). 46% lesions were complicated. The length of stenosis was 12.9 +/- 6.7 mm in the group SA and 14.1 +/- 7.4 mm in the group UA, 30% stenoses were long. RESULTS: Successful stenting was stated in 99% without cases of acute thrombosis. Non-fatal myocardial infarction took place in hospital in 1.3% of SA patients and in 2.6% of UA patients. Incidence of cardiac complications (death, recurrent angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, restenosis, repeated revascularization) for 6-month follow-up was 15.6% in SA group and 18.1% in UA group. At angiographic control, the index of vascular diameter loss made up 0.22 +/- 0.2 in SA group and 0.3 +/- 0.27 in UA group. Incidence of restenosis was 12 and 14%, respectively. 18-month follow-up found no differences in frequency of complications: 21.6 and 22.6% in groups SA and UA, respectively. CONCLUSION: Implantation of the stent "Ephesos" is effective in prevention of thrombosis and restenosis in patients with stable or unstable angina pectoris at high risk of intervention.
