Effect of muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration on mid-term clinical, and functional outcomes after Achilles tendon repair.

OBJECTIVES: Muscle atrophy is one of the most common problems after Achilles tendon repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of gastrosoleus muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration on clinical, and functional outcomes after Achilles tendon repair. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 46 patients (mean age = 39.3 ± 7.4 years) who underwent open Achilles tendon repair were included in the study. During the clinical evaluation of muscle atrophy, ipsilateral and contralateral calf circumference (CC), maximum heel rise (HR), and ankle range of motion measurements were recorded. Functional outcomes were assessed via The Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, and the Leppilahti score. Muscle volume (MV), cross-sectional area (CSA), and percent of fatty infiltration (FI) were measured via magnetic image resonance. RESULTS: The functional outcome scores were excellent: ATRS = 98.1 ± 2.2; AOFAS = 97.3 ± 4.1; Leppilahti score = 95.8 ± 5.1. There were significant differences detected between injured and non-injured legs regarding CC, HR, MV, CSA, and FI. Additionally, there were significant negative correlations between CSA and MV loss with all functional outcome scores. FI was correlated with only the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score. CONCLUSIONS: Significant muscle atrophy was measured after a mean follow-up period of 7.4 (range 2.0-12.6) years post-surgery and negatively correlated with clinical outcomes. CC is an easy and cost-effective measurement method to predict MV during the follow-up of Achilles tendon repairs.

Congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis: clinical and radiologic findings and treatment.

Congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis (CNPAS) is an unusual cause of airway obstruction in the newborn and infants. Immediate recognition and therapy are essential for this potentially life-threatening circumstance. CNPAS should be considered in the differential diagnosis of any infant with episodic apnea, cyclical cyanosis, and feeding difficulty. Computerized tomographic (CT) measurements and imaging features enable accurate diagnosis of this abnormality. In this report we demonstrated CT examination findings of CNPAS in a neonate.

Is the use of plain abdominal radiographs (PAR) a necessity for all patients with suspected acute appendicitis in emergency services?

PURPOSE: Almost all patients with suspected appendicitis have plain abdominal radiographies (PAR) at the emergency departments. The aims of this study are to evaluate the ability of PAR to diagnose suspected acute appendicitis in patients and to predict length of hospital stay (LOS). METHODS: Three blinded radiologists retrospectively and separately reviewed the preoperative PARs of all patients with suspected appendicitis, who underwent surgery in our hospital for 1 year period based on 8 radiologic criteria. The patients were divided into 3 groups [acute appendicitis (group 1), perforated appendicitis (group 2), and negative appendectomy (group 3)] according to their perioperative and pathological findings. The relationship between the presence/absence of the PAR findings and the diagnosis and LOS were analyzed. RESULTS: The study consisted of 162 patients (103 men, 63.6%). There were 96 (60.5%), 45 (27.8%), and 19 (11.7%) patients in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Although there were more men in the study overall (p < 0.001), there were more women in groups 2 and 3 than group 1 (p = 0.004, p < 0.001, respectively). Group 2 had the longest LOS, and Group 3 had the shortest LOS (p < 0.001). The generalized air-fluid level was more commonly observed in group 2 patients (7 of 45) than in group 1 patients (2 of 98) (p < 0.05). The LOS was longer in group 3 when the sentinel loop was present on the PAR (n = 3) (p = 0.017), and in group 2 when the colon cutoff sign was positive (n = 3) on the PAR (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that PAR is rarely beneficial in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and in the prediction of LOS. The PAR may not be a necessity for all patients with suspected acute appendicitis.