Parent-patient Discrepancies in the Quality of Life Assessment of Early-onset Scoliosis: A Comparison Between 2 Questionnaires Completed on 2 Different Time Points - A Preliminary Report.

BACKGROUND: EOSQ-24 is a parent proxy questionnaire designed to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients during their childhood years. EOSQ-SELF, a novel self-reported questionnaire, assesses HRQoL in older children (>8 y) and adolescents. So far, the same group of EOS patients has not been evaluated with both EOSQ-24 and EOSQ-SELF. The aim of this study was to evaluate how the same pathology was reflected in the parent and patient at different time points by comparing the answers to the common questions between EOSQ-24 and EOSQ-SELF. METHODS: A group of otherwise healthy EOS patients whose parents filled out EOSQ-24 at the early phase of growth-friendly treatment was re-tested by the EOSQ-SELF questionnaire at the end of treatment. Both EOSQ-24 and EOSQ-SELF are validated in Turkish. Inclusion criteria were patients with EOS, independent ambulation, age of 8 years or older at EOSQ-SELF enrollment, literacy in Turkish, no apparent intellectual impairment, and a minimum of 24 months after graduation. The common questions between the 2 surveys with nearly identical phrasings were extracted. Common items from the 2 tests were compared with a Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (15 females, 6 males) who previously filled out EOSQ-24 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the group was 10 (5 to 16) years at EOSQ-24 participation and 18 (13 to 24) at the final analysis. Fourteen questions were found common in 10 domains. The scores were significantly different in 5 questions of 4 domains. EOSQ-SELF had significantly less favorable scores in the pain/discomfort, pulmonary function, and fatigue/energy level domains. Scores in the parental burden/relationships domain were significantly higher (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The self-reported group had a general trend of worse results. Parents and caregivers may not accurately perceive the problems of EOS patients. Our findings indicate a disconnect between caregivers and the patients, as both parties underreported the other side in some domains. These findings suggest the challenges faced by EOS patients are not adequately reflected on proxy questionnaires that assess the HRQoL of children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level I.

A Comprehensive Assessment of Psychosocial Well-being Among Growing Rod Graduates: A Preliminary Investigation.

BACKGROUND: Traditional growing rods (TGR) encompass a long process, in which patients experience physical and psychosocial difficulties. However, the effect of repeating surgeries on the overall psychological functioning of graduated patients has not been thoroughly investigated in the literature. The aim of this study is to evaluate the psychological well-being of graduated idiopathic early-onset scoliosis patients in terms of psychopathology, neurocognition, and psychosocial functioning, and determine the accuracy of scoliosis outcome questionnaires in these regards. METHODS: TGR graduates with idiopathic early-onset scoliosis without known intellectual disabilities or neuromuscular impairments were included. Patients were thoroughly evaluated using psychological instruments [Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Auditory Consonant Trigram Test, Verbal Fluency Test, Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Symptom Checklist-90, Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, Spinal Appearance Questionnaire, Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire (SRS-22)]. Results were compared with normative data when available. Spearman correlations were performed between the results of these tests, the total treatment duration, and the number of spinal surgeries. RESULTS: Of the 15 patients included in the study, 9 were females, and the mean age was 18.73 (16 to 23). The mean age at index surgery was 6.38 (3 to 10) whereas that of graduation was 14.00 (12 to 16). The average number of spinal surgeries was 14.28 (7 to 20). Two patients performed below the range of adult intellectual functioning. Auditory Consonant Trigram Test showed normal verbal working memory and attention control. Six patients had abnormal Verbal Fluency Test performance. Eight patients had abnormal ratings on at least one of the assessment scales of psychopathology (Symptom Checklist-90, Beck Depression Inventory, and Beck Anxiety Inventory). Eight patients had low-to-moderate self-esteem (Rosenberg self-esteem scale). The median spinal appearance questionnaire and SRS-22 scores were 34 and 4.18, respectively. Pain and function subdomains of SRS-22 scored higher than self-image and mental health. No correlation was found between the treatment duration and number of surgeries and test scores. SRS-22 showed correlations with multiple psychological tests. CONCLUSION: Completed TGR treatment yields acceptable correction of deformities and surgical outcomes, however, may fail to improve psychological well-being. This is the first study to find various psychosocial abnormalities in two-thirds of cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV; cross-sectional study.

The Effect of Apical Vertebra Position on Growing Rod Treatment: A Clinical and Finite Element Study.

BACKGROUND: Growing rods (GRs) is a commonly utilized technique for the management of early-onset scoliosis. The significance of the position of the apical vertebrae relative to the rods is not known. The purpose of this study is to analyze the potential effects of the position of the apical vertebrae in relation to the GRs on deformity control through plain radiographs and finite element analysis (FEA) modeling. METHODS: We identified 140 patients treated with GR between 2000 and 2018. Patients who had a congenital vertebral anomaly or <2-year follow-up were excluded. Curve magnitude, traction radiograph under general anesthesia (TRUGA) flexibility, apical rotation, the lengths of T1-12, T1-S1, and the instrumented segments were recorded. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the apical position on the postoperative radiographs: group 1 (both pedicles are between the rods), group 2 (convex rod is between the apical vertebra pedicles), group 3 (both pedicles are lateral to the convex rod). FEA models were created simulating the 3 groups. Both radiographic and FEA data were analyzed to compare the deformity control and growth in each group. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included in the final analyses (mean age 84 mo; range: 38 to 148). Ten patients (17%) were in group 1, 34 (59%) in group 2, and 14 (24%) in group 3. Difference between TRUGA flexibilities was statistically insignificant. Group 3 was the least successful in terms of both height gain and rotational control. FEA showed a decrease in rotation and displacement for every group, however, the residual rotation and displacement was highest in group 3. CONCLUSIONS: Bringing the apex in line with the GR increases the capacity of growth preservation as it results in largest height gain and better deformity control. FEA model demonstrated that distraction alone is inadequate for controlling rotation, and with increasing apical translation, residual rotation after distraction also increases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Sagittal spinal alignment after total hip arthroplasty for neglected high hip dysplasia: does changing the distorted mechanics of the hip normalize spinal alignment?

PURPOSE: The false acetabulum lies more laterally and posteriorly compared with the true acetabulum. Spatial orientation of the pelvis is significantly altered in patients with neglected high hip dysplasia. There has been no study to investigate how pelvic or sagittal spinal alignment change after true acetabulum gains function with hip arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of total hip arthroplasty with femoral shortening on spinopelvic parameters in patients with neglected high hip dysplasia. METHODS: Twenty patients with Crowe type 3 or 4 hip dysplasia, who underwent total hip arthroplasty with femoral shortening in our institution were evaluated preoperatively after completion of rehabilitation and return to their normal daily life. Sagittal alignment (sacral slope, pelvic incidence, global tilt, segmental lordosis, segmental kyphosis, GAP score) and coronal alignment angles (coronal tilt, Cobb angle) of patients were measured by two independent observers. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent hip arthroplasty with femoral shortening followed up for a minimum of 12 months. We found higher preoperative global lordosis (68.7 ± 9.7) and sacral slope (52.1 ± 8.8) angles, but the pelvic incidences (57.9 ± 10.1) were in the normal range. No statistically significant difference in any sagittal spinopelvic parameters between pre- and postoperative measurements was detected. GAP scores also did not change significantly (p = 0.231). Coronal plane parameters (Cobb angle, coronal pelvic tilt) were the only parameters in which a statistical change was observed (p = 0.02, p = 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: Lumbar lordosis and sacral slope values are outside standard ranges in patients with neglected dysplasia of the hip. The reconstruction of the distorted mechanics of the hip joint does not normalize sagittal pelvic and spine anatomy however improvements in coronal alignment were observed. Disease specific values of sagittal spinal alignment should be used in the treatment of lumbar degenerative problems in patients with neglected high hip dysplasia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Spinal Instrumentation in Growing Children Retards the Natural Development of Pelvic Incidence.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic incidence increases gradually throughout growth until skeletal maturity. Growing rod instrumentation has been suggested to have a stabilizing effect on the development of the normal sagittal spinal alignment. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of fixed sagittal plane caused by dual growing rod instrumentation on the natural progression of sagittal spinopelvic parameters in children with idiopathic or idiopathic-like early onset scoliosis. METHODS: Hospital records of children with growing rod instrumentation from 4 separate institutions were reviewed retrospectively. Inclusion criteria were idiopathic or idiopathic-like early onset scoliosis, treatment with dual growing rods with lower instrumented vertebra L4 or upper and more than 2 years of follow-up. Instrumentation levels, magnitudes of major curve, thoracic kyphosis (T2-T12), lumbar lordosis (L1-S1) and pelvic incidence were recorded from preoperative and postoperative standing whole-spine radiographs. Estimated pelvic incidence was also calculated for each patient as if their spines had not been instrumented using the previous normative data. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. Average age at initial surgery was 7.4±1.8 years (range, 4 to 12 y). Mean follow-up time was 71±26 months (range, 27 to 120 mo). Mean preoperative Cobb angle of 59±13.5 (range, 30 to 86) degrees was reduced to 35.1±17.5 (range, 11 to 78) degrees at the last follow-up. Mean preoperative T2-T12 kyphosis angle was 46.2±14.9 degrees (range, 22 to 84 degrees). At the latest follow-up, it was 44.8±16.2 degrees (range, 11 to 84 degrees) (P=0.93). Mean L1-S1 lordosis angle was 50.5±10.7 degrees (range, 30 to 72 degrees) preoperatively. At the latest follow-up, mean L1-S1 lordosis angle was 48.8±12.7 degrees (range, 26 to 74 degrees) (P=0.29). Mean preoperative pelvic incidence was 45.7±7.9 degrees (range, 30 to 68 degrees). At the latest follow-up, it was 46.7±8.4 degrees (range, 34 to 72 degrees) (P=0.303). The estimated average pelvic incidence was 49.5 degrees (P=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Previously reported developmental changes of the sagittal spinal parameters were not observed in children who underwent posterior spinal instrumentation. Our findings suggest that spinal instrumentation impedes the natural development of the sagittal spinal profile. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-this is a retrospective case-series.

Pull-out of Upper Thoracic Pedicle Screws Can Cause Spinal Canal Encroachment in Growing Rod Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Proximal foundation failure is a common complication of growing rod (GR) treatment for early-onset scoliosis. Spinal canal encroachment due to pull-out of pedicle screw used as proximal foundation has been anecdotally reported in GR patients. The aim of this study is to report the prevalence of spinal canal encroachment of pedicle screws in GR treatment and determine risk factors using a single-center cohort. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were: (1) GR for early-onset scoliosis and (2) pull-out of at least 1 proximal anchor pedicle screw. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence of medial screw migration. Medial migration of the screw was confirmed by computed tomography. The extracted data included demographic, clinical, and radiographic information. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients (of 96) met inclusion criteria (21.8%). None of the screws appeared malpositioned on early postoperative x-ray. Average follow-up until screw failure was 50.4 months (64 to 85 mo) and average number of lengthenings 8.1 (4 to 13). Computed tomography revealed canal encroachment in 11 patients (group 1), and no encroachment in 10 (group 2). There was no significant difference between groups for age, follow-up or number of lengthenings. At the time of screw pull-out, coronal plane deformity was increased compared with early postoperative x-ray in all; however, this increase was significantly higher in group 1 (45.7 vs. 35 degrees, P=0.002). Proximal junctional angle (PJA) was increased in both groups at the time of pull-out. While not statistically significant, PJA increased linearly in group 1 but spiked in group 2 at the time of pull-out. There was no neurological event preoperatively, intraoperatively or postoperatively. Failed screws were safely revised in either planned/unplanned surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with proximal anchor failure of GR, especially if there is increase of coronal deformity and/or PJA, possible spinal encroachment should be kept in mind. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-retrospective case series.

Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Versus Multiple Posterior Column Osteotomies in Severe and Rigid Neuromuscular Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of the apical pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) technique with multiple posterior column osteotomies (PCOs) in nonambulatory patients with severe, rigid neuromuscular scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Neuromuscular scoliosis frequently causes intolerance to sitting due to pelvic obliquity, trunk decompensation, and associated back and rib impingement pain which diminish the patient's functional capacity. In the case of rigid curves, spinal osteotomy techniques are occasionally required for effective correction. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our patients with severe and rigid neuromuscular scoliosis with associated pelvic obliquity who were treated with posterior instrumented fusion extending to pelvis with more than 1-year postoperative follow-up. We compared radiological and clinical results of PSO and multiple PCO techniques in severe rigid neuromuscular scoliosis with pelvic obliquity of more than 15° in traction radiograph under general anesthesia. Hospital records were also reviewed for operative time, intraoperative blood loss, amount of blood transfusion, duration of hospital stay, and complications. RESULTS: There were 12 patients in the PSO group and 10 patients in the PCO group. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of major curve magnitude, sagittal parameters or pelvic obliquity. Although not statistically significant, PSO technique did trend toward better scoliosis correction (post-op Cobb angle 56.1° vs. 66.7° [P = 0.415]). PSO technique provided a significantly better correction in pelvic obliquity (59% vs. 84%) (P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in average intraoperative blood loss, transfusion, and operative times including anesthesia time, hospital stay, or complications. CONCLUSION: PSO may be an option in correction of severe and rigid neuromuscular scoliosis. It provides better correction of pelvic obliquity without increasing operative time, need for transfusion, or duration of hospitalization as compared to multiple apical PCO technique. Traction radiograph under general anesthesia is a valuable tool in surgical decision making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Thoracic Spine Growth Revisited: How Accurate Is the Dimeglio Data?

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study. OBJECTIVE: To describe the normal rate pattern of thoracic spine growth in children without any spinal deformity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The knowledge of thoracic spine growth and height is important for growing spine treatment and the decision of final fusion. Currently, pediatric spinal deformity is approached as early onset and late onset with an understanding of the fast growth during the first 5 years of life. The growth data that support this classification is often cited but has not been reconfirmed with follow-up studies. METHODS: Sagittal computed tomography (CT) reformations of thoracic vertebrae were examined in children without spinal deformity. The sagittal CT cut at the widest canal diameter was identified and the measurements were performed on this image. The length of the thoracic spine was measured from the posterosuperior corner of T1 to the posteroinferior corner of the T12. RESULTS: One hundred forty-four thoracic CT scans satisfied the inclusion criteria. The analysis of the data identified two break points in the growth velocity; one at the end of the 4th year of life and the other at the beginning of the 12th year. Specifically, growth rate between 1 and 4 years was 1.71 cm/yr, between 4 and 8 years was 0.55 cm/yr, between 8 and 10 was 0.74 cm/yr, between 10 and 12 was 0.69 cm/yr, and between 12 and 16 was 1.61 cm/yr. CONCLUSION: The results show that in growing children the thoracic spine demonstrates two major growth spurts. The initial growth spurt is between the birth to the end of the fourth year of life and the second is between the 12 and 16 years of age. Between 4 and 12 years there is a steady but slower increase in thoracic height. The findings show that the fastest growth velocity may be limited to a younger age group than previously believed. This data will help guide growth friendly management strategies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

The Development of Thoracic Vertebral Sagittal Morphology During Childhood.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional descriptive study objectives to describe normal development of thoracic vertebrae during childhood and document contribution of individual vertebral shape to the sagittal alignment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Sagittal spinal alignment changes during growth. The changes in sagittal alignment during adolescent growth spurt as well as the individual shapes of thoracic vertebrae have been implicated as factors for the development of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The contribution of individual vertebral shape to the sagittal alignment and the changes in the vertebral shape with growth is not known. METHODS: Sagittal computed tomographic (CT) scans of thoracic vertebrae were examined in children without any evidence of spinal deformity. Vertical distances between the endplates at the most anterior and most posterior sides of vertebral body were measured as anterior vertebral height (aVH) and posterior vertebral height (pVH), respectively. RESULTS: There were a total of 133 CT scans done on 71 male and 62 female children. The children were grouped as follows: Group I (0-2 years of age), Group II (3-6 years of age), Group III (7-9 years of age), Group IV (10-12 years of age), and Group V (13-16 years of age). A-P ratios of vertebral heights were grouped as T1-T5, T6-T8, and T9-T12. Measurements demonstrated that the anterior and posterior heights in each vertebra grew longitudinally and consistently with increasing age. The aVH/pVH ratio of each individual vertebra showed no significant difference according to age. Measurements of thoracic vertebrae on sagittal spinal CT images did not show any differences in the relative growth and heights of the anterior versus posterior walls of the vertebral bodies in any of the segments in any age or age group. CONCLUSIONS: The sagittal alignment changes during growth are likely related to maintenance of sagittal balance rather than the shapes of individual vertebrae. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Lumbopelvic fusion with a new fixation technique in lumbosacral agenesis: three cases.

PURPOSE: Patients with lumbosacral agenesis characteristically sit on their iliac wings with their torsos bent forward, which yields an increase in intra-abdominal pressure and, subsequently, negative effects on their diaphragm. The sacrum is not available as an anchor point for instrumentation. Dunn-McCarthy rods or Galveston fixations cannot be performed due to these limited anatomic properties. On the other hand, the absence of necessary bone mass for fusion anteriorly limits the fusion interventions to the posterior. Therefore, a secure and rigid fixation is essential to preclude the need for an external support. There are limited publications discussing different techniques due to the relatively rare incidence of the disease. We report the clinical and radiological results of a new technique applied to three patients in which previously recommended methods are modified. METHODS: Two 6-year-old female patients and one 5-year-old male patient with lumbosacral agenesis underwent posterior lumbopelvic instrumentation and fusion. Together with standard pedicle screw spinal instrumentation, pelvic fixation is obtained with a combination of supero-inferior directed rod and/or screw to overcome deforming forces created at the flexion-extension pivot points of the lumbopelvic junction. Autogenic anterior tibial cortical structural graft is used for laminopelvic bridging, and demineralized bone matrix is used for the augmentation of osteoinduction. A single leg hip spica is applied for 4 months to protect the fixation. RESULTS: Total correction yielded an aligned spine with a posture that allows for sitting on the ischial spines for all three patients. Solid fusion was observed to maintain this correction at the final follow-up. CONCLUSION: The use of new-generation pediatric spinal instrumentation systems with a new technique without knee disarticulation provides a safe and effective fixation and fusion in lumbosacral agenesis.