Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21185793

ABSTRACT

An analytical method based upon liquid chromatography coupled to ion trap mass spectrometry (MS) detection with electrospray ionization interface has been developed for the simultaneous identification and quantification of droperidol and ondansetron in human plasma. The two drugs were isolated from 0.5 mL of plasma using a basic liquid-liquid extraction with diethyl ether/heptane (90/10, v/v) and tropisetron and haloperidol as internal standards, with satisfactory extraction recoveries. They were separated on a 5-µm C(18) Highpurity column (150 mm×2.1 mm I.D.) maintained at 30°C. The elution was achieved isocratically with a mobile phase of 2 mM HCOONH(4) pH 3.8 buffer/acetonitrile (60/40, v/v) at a flow rate of 200 µL/min. Data were collected either in full-scan MS mode at m/z 100-450 or in full-scan MS-MS mode, selecting the [M+H] (+) ion at m/z=294.0 for ondansetron, m/z=285.2 for tropisetron, m/z=380.0 for droperidol and m/z=376.0 for haloperidol. The most intense daughter ion of ondansetron (m/z=212.0) and droperidol (m/z=194.0) were used for quantification. Retention times for tropisetron, ondansetron, droperidol and haloperidol were 2.50, 2.61, 3.10 and 4.68 min, respectively. Calibration curves were linear for both compounds in the 0.50-500 ng/mL range. The limits of detection and quantification were 0.10 ng/mL and 0.50 ng/mL, respectively. The intra- and inter-assay precisions were lower than 6.4% and intra- and inter-assay recoveries were in the 97.6-101.9% range for the three 3, 30 and 300 ng/mL concentrations. This method allows simultaneous and rapid measurement of droperidol and ondansetron, which are frequently co-administrated for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.


Subject(s)
Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Droperidol/blood , Ondansetron/blood , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/blood , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Droperidol/therapeutic use , Humans , Linear Models , Ondansetron/therapeutic use , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/drug therapy , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization/methods
2.
Fundam Clin Pharmacol ; 24(2): 239-45, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19719551

ABSTRACT

Oral hormone therapy is associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis. Drug agencies recommend the use of the lowest efficient dose to treat menopausal symptoms for a better risk/ratio profile, although this profile has not been totally investigated yet. The aim of the study was to compare the effect of the standard dose of 17beta-estradiol to a lower one on thrombin generation (TG). In a 2-month study, healthy menopausal women were randomized to receive daily 1mg or 2 mg of 17beta-estradiol (E1, n = 24 and E2, n = 26; respectively) with 10 mg dydrogesterone or placebo (PL, n = 22). Plasma levels factors VII, X, VIII and II were assessed before and after treatment as well as Tissue factor triggered TG, which allows the investigation of the different phases of coagulation process. The peak of thrombin was higher in hormone therapy groups (E1: 42.39 +/- 50.23 nm, E2: 31.08 +/- 85.86 nm vs. 10.52 +/- 40.63 nm in PL, P = 0.002 and P = 0.01). Time to reach the peak was also shortened (PL: 0.26 +/- 0.69 min vs. E1: -0.26 +/- 0.80 min, E2: -0.55 +/- 0.79 min, P <10(-3) for both comparisons) and mean rate index of the propagation phase of TG was significantly increased. Among the studied clotting factors, only the levels of FVII were significantly increased after treatment administration. The two doses of 17beta-estradiol induced in a similar degree an acceleration of the initiation and propagation phase of tissue factor triggered thrombin generation and a significant increase of FVII coagulant activity.


Subject(s)
Dydrogesterone/pharmacology , Estradiol/pharmacology , Menopause , Thrombin/drug effects , Administration, Oral , Aged , Blood Coagulation Factors/drug effects , Blood Coagulation Factors/metabolism , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Dydrogesterone/administration & dosage , Estradiol/administration & dosage , Estrogens/administration & dosage , Estrogens/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Progestins/administration & dosage , Progestins/pharmacology , Thrombin/metabolism , Time Factors
3.
Am J Cardiol ; 103(6): 887-90, 2009 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19268751

ABSTRACT

QT-interval duration is shorter in men than in women. Estrogens do not significantly influence the duration of repolarization. The effect of testosterone has not been studied directly in humans. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of testosterone on corrected QT duration in hypogonadic men. Eleven hypogonadic men were enrolled in this prospective interventional study. Digital electrocardiograms were recorded for each participant at 3 levels of testosterone, high, medium, and low, after a single intramuscular administration of testosterone. Heart rate-independent assessment of QT-interval duration was used. QT(1,000) (QT at 60 beats/min) was determined for each subject. Total blood testosterone and the ratio of testosterone to sex hormone-binding globulin were assessed at each visit. The median values of QT(1,000) were 352 ms (interquartile range 340 to 363), 357 ms (interquartile range 349 to 367), and 363 ms (interquartile range 357 to 384) at high, medium, and low testosterone concentrations, respectively (p <0.013 for the 3 comparisons). A maximal mean difference of 13.6 +/- 2.8 ms (p = 0.0007) was observed between high and low levels of testosterone. A negative linear relation was found between QT(1,000) and testosterone concentration (p = 0.0001) or the ratio of testosterone to sex hormone-binding globulin (p = 0.004). In conclusion, the difference in QT-interval duration between men and women might be explained by differences in testosterone levels, and testosterone shortens ventricular repolarization.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Agents/administration & dosage , Electrocardiography/drug effects , Hypogonadism/drug therapy , Testosterone/administration & dosage , Ventricular Function/drug effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiovascular Agents/blood , Exercise Test , Humans , Hypogonadism/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Testosterone/blood , Ventricular Function/physiology
4.
Anesthesiology ; 109(2): 206-12, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18648229

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Droperidol and ondansetron have previously been found to prolong the QT interval in the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. However, this adverse effect has never been confirmed and compared with both drugs under controlled conditions. The objective was to study the effects of droperidol and ondansetron alone or in combination on QT interval duration in healthy subjects. METHODS: Sixteen healthy volunteers, eight males and eight females, were enrolled in this prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Subjects received 1 mg droperidol, 4 mg ondansetron, 1 mg droperidol plus 4 mg ondansetron, or a placebo, intravenously in a crossover design. Fridericia-corrected QT interval (QTcF) and plasma concentrations were measured repeatedly during 10 h at each study period. The primary endpoint was the maximal placebo time-matched and baseline-subtracted QTcF prolongation (DeltaDeltaQTcF). RESULTS: Compared with placebo, both droperidol and ondansetron significantly prolonged the QTcF interval. DeltaDeltaQTcF prolongation was 25 +/- 8 ms after droperidol, significantly greater than the 17 +/- 10-ms prolongation with ondansetron (P = 0.014). The combination of droperidol and ondansetron significantly increased the mean maximal DeltaDeltaQTcF by 28 +/- 10 ms. The combination induced greater QTcF prolongation compared with ondansetron alone (P = 0.001), but not with droperidol alone (P = 0.33). There was no significant pharmacokinetic interaction between droperidol and ondansetron. CONCLUSIONS: Under controlled conditions, both droperidol and ondansetron either alone or in combination induced significant marked QTc interval prolongation. However, the combination of both drugs did not significantly increase QTc prolongation compared with that induced by droperidol alone.


Subject(s)
Antiemetics/pharmacology , Droperidol/pharmacology , Electrocardiography/drug effects , Heart Rate/drug effects , Long QT Syndrome/chemically induced , Ondansetron/pharmacology , Adult , Antiemetics/adverse effects , Antiemetics/pharmacokinetics , Area Under Curve , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Droperidol/adverse effects , Droperidol/pharmacokinetics , Drug Interactions , Female , Half-Life , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Metabolic Clearance Rate , Ondansetron/adverse effects , Ondansetron/pharmacokinetics
5.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 60(2): 120-7, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16042664

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Telithromycin belongs to ketolides, a new class of macrolide antibiotics. Macrolides are known to have the potential to prolong QT interval duration. Previous studies have shown that telithromycin did not induce significant QT interval prolongation in healthy subjects compared with placebo. The main objective of this study was to demonstrate the absence of amplification of QT interval prolongation induced by sotalol, when telithromycin and sotalol were co-administered. The secondary objective was to correlate the QT interval changes induced by the study drugs to plasma concentrations during the elimination phase. METHODS: Twenty-four women received sotalol (160 mg) together with placebo or telithromycin (800 mg) in a two-period, double-blind, randomized study. Electrocardiograms were recorded at rest. Comparison of maximal corrected QT interval (QTc(max)) with sotalol in the presence or absence of telithromycin was performed. The relation between sotalol concentration and QTc was studied using linear regression. RESULTS: Mean difference (95% CI) between QTc(max) with sotalol-placebo and QTc(max) with sotalol-telithromycin was -15.5 ms (-27.7 to -3.2 ms). QTc(max) interval prolongation was lower (P < 0.05) with sotalol-telithromycin than with sotalol-placebo, in relation to decreased sotalol plasma concentrations. Regression analysis showed that the relationship between sotalol plasma concentration and QTc interval duration was not modified by telithromycin co-administration. CONCLUSION: Our results do not support a potential synergistic effect on QT interval prolongation between sotalol and telithromycin. The decrease of mean QTc interval in subjects taking telithromycin and sotalol may be explained by a decrease of sotalol concentration.


Subject(s)
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Ketolides/administration & dosage , Long QT Syndrome/chemically induced , Sotalol/administration & dosage , Ventricular Function/drug effects , Administration, Oral , Adult , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/pharmacokinetics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Double-Blind Method , Drug Interactions , Electrocardiography/methods , Female , Humans , Ketolides/adverse effects , Ketolides/pharmacokinetics , Sotalol/adverse effects , Sotalol/pharmacokinetics
6.
Eur Heart J ; 24(18): 1663-7, 2003 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14499229

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Women have a longer QT interval and a greater incidence of torsades de pointes than men. It has been suggested that oestrogens may influence the duration of cardiac repolarization. We thus investigated the influence of oestradiol (E2) on ventricular repolarization within the physiological concentration range of this hormone. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied QT interval duration in 21 healthy women aged 18 to 35 years with regular menstrual cycle (mean duration: 29+/-1 days) during two periods associated with a wide range of oestradiol plasma levels: low level during menses (105+/-34 pmol/l) and high level during the pre-ovulatory phase (750+/-277 pmol/l). We used heart rate-independent assessment of QT. QT-RR pairs were measured over a wide range of RR intervals obtained at rest and during a sub-maximal exercise test. Using a monoexponential nonlinear curve fitting for the QT-RR relation, the QT(1000 ms)during nadir and peak oestradiol periods was then determined for each subject. QT(1000 ms)interval was not different between both study periods: 382.1+/-18.4 ms at peak versus 382.2+/-19.4 ms at nadir oestradiol level (P=0.98). CONCLUSION: No significant change in QT interval duration was observed within the large range of physiological E2 variations found during the menstrual cycle.


Subject(s)
Estradiol/physiology , Heart Conduction System/physiology , Heart Rate/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Electrocardiography , Estradiol/blood , Female , Humans , Menstrual Cycle/physiology , Sex Factors , Ventricular Function/physiology
7.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 73(3): 242-52, 2003 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12621389

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Telithromycin is the first member of a new class of antimicrobials-the ketolides. The main objective of this study was to assess the effect of various oral doses of telithromycin on QT interval during single and repeated administrations. METHODS: Seventeen men and 17 women participated in double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover studies. Of these subjects, 18 (9 men and 9 women) received single and repeated oral doses of telithromycin (800 mg daily), clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily), or placebo (protocol 1). The other 16 subjects received a single oral dose (800 mg, 1600 mg, and 2400 mg) of telithromycin or placebo (protocol 2). At the time of expected telithromycin maximum concentration, several electrocardiographic recordings were obtained at rest and during the course of a submaximal exercise test. QT intervals were measured within a wide range of R-R intervals in each subject. RESULTS: ANOVA showed that telithromycin did not increase QT interval at any dose compared with placebo. The greatest effect observed during any study period was a mean (+/-SD) change in QT-interval duration of 4.2 +/- 15.2 ms (ie, +1.2% +/- 4.0%, P not significant) at R-R = 1000 ms after repeated doses of 800 mg telithromycin. Outlier values (change in Bazett QTc from baseline >60 ms) from resting 12-lead electrocardiograms did not differ across treatment groups, including placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Telithromycin administered as repeated doses of 800 mg (recommended doses) or as single doses of up to 3 times this recommended dose did not increase the QT interval at any heart rate at rest and during effort. Telithromycin did not prolong QT-interval duration when administered to healthy young male and female subjects.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Heart Conduction System/drug effects , Ketolides , Macrolides , Administration, Oral , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Clarithromycin/administration & dosage , Clarithromycin/pharmacology , Cross-Over Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Electrocardiography/drug effects , Exercise Test , Female , Humans , Male , Reference Values , Rest
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...