Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Nomograms , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/psychology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/diagnosis , Head and Neck Neoplasms/psychology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnosis , Suicide/psychology , Risk Assessment , Reproducibility of Results , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Temozolomide (TMZ) has been used as a first-line therapy against lower-grade gliomas (LGGs) combined with other chemotherapy drugs. However, there has been no reliable index predicting TMZ response of patients with LGGs. In this study, we aim to investigate the relationship between gene expressions and the prognosis of TMZ therapy in LGGs. We integrated transcriptome and clinical data of 171 LGGs from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA). Consensus LASSO Cox regression was used to identify 14 key genes related to different clinical outcomes under TMZ chemotherapy. We constructed and evaluated a risk score based on the 14 genes. Patients with LGGs of lower risk scores (low-risk group) generally had better survival than those LGGs of higher risk scores (high-risk group), which is independent of clinicopathological factors. High-risk patients showed activation of innate and humoral-type immunity. The prognostic contribution of the risk score was validated in an independent validation cohort of 65 patients. Besides, combined with three independent predictors (grade, IDH1 mutation status, and chr1p19q co-deletion status), we further developed a nomogram to predict the benefit of TMZ treatment in LGGs. Our results indicate that a transcriptome-based index can optimize the treatment strategy for patients with LGGs under TMZ therapy.
ABSTRACT
Objective: This review aimed to comprehensively analyze the safety and efficacy of erdafitinib in treating advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma and other solid tumors. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched until 10 February 2022. The safety outcome as adverse events and efficacy outcomes, including objective response rate, stable disease rates, and progressive disease rates, were selected and analyzed by comprehensive meta-analysis version 3.0 and STATA 15.0. Results: The most common all-grade adverse events were hyperphosphatemia, dry mouth, stomatitis, diarrhea, and dysgeusia. The occurrence of ≥3 adverse events was relatively low, and stomatitis and hyponatremia were the most common. Moreover, eye disorders could not be ignored. Efficacy in urothelial carcinoma patients was obviously better than in other solid tumor patients, with a higher objective response rate (0.38 versus 0.10) and lower progressive disease rate (0.26 versus 0.68). All responses occurred in patients with fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alteration. In those patients, a specific FGFR alteration (FGFR3-TACC3) was observed to have a maximum response. Conclusion: Erdafitinib has satisfactory clinical activity for metastatic urothelial carcinoma and other solid tumors, while the toxicity is acceptable. With more RCTs and combination therapy trials published, erdafitinib will be applied widely.
