Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Ophthalmol ; 31(1): 103-111, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31595773

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the additive intraocular pressure-lowering effect of twice-daily brinzolamide 1%/brimonidine 0.2% fixed-dose combination (BBFC) as an adjunct to a prostaglandin analog (PGA) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension insufficiently controlled with PGA monotherapy. METHODS: In this Phase 4, double-masked trial, patients aged ⩾18 years, with a mean intraocular pressure of ⩾19 and <32 mm Hg in at least one eye were randomized (1:1) to receive BBFC + PGA (n = 96) or vehicle + PGA (n = 92) for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was the mean change in diurnal intraocular pressure from baseline (averaged over 09:00 and 11:00 h) at Week 6. RESULTS: The mean diurnal intraocular pressure at baseline was similar in the BBFC + PGA (22.8 mm Hg) and vehicle + PGA (22.9 mm Hg) groups. The least squares mean change in diurnal intraocular pressure from baseline at Week 6 was greater with BBFC + PGA (-5.59 mm Hg (95% confidence interval: -6.2 to -5.0)) than with vehicle + PGA (-2.15 mm Hg (95% confidence interval: -2.7 to -1.6)); the treatment difference was statistically significant in favor of BBFC + PGA (-3.44 mm Hg, (95% confidence interval: -4.2 to -2.7); p < 0.001). Ocular adverse events were reported in 21.1% and 8.7% of patients in the BBFC + PGA and vehicle + PGA groups, respectively. The most frequent ocular adverse event was ocular hyperemia (5.3%) in the BBFC + PGA group and blurred vision (2.2%) in the vehicle + PGA group. CONCLUSION: BBFC + PGA significantly reduced mean diurnal intraocular pressure than PGA alone in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. The safety findings with BBFC + PGA were consistent with the known safety profile of the individual medications.


Subject(s)
Brimonidine Tartrate/therapeutic use , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/drug therapy , Latanoprost/therapeutic use , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Thiazines/therapeutic use , Travoprost/therapeutic use , Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists/adverse effects , Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Brimonidine Tartrate/adverse effects , Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Female , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/physiopathology , Humans , Intraocular Pressure/drug effects , Intraocular Pressure/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Ocular Hypertension/drug therapy , Ocular Hypertension/physiopathology , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Thiazines/adverse effects , Tonometry, Ocular
2.
J Glaucoma ; 18(4): 293-300, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19365194

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study compared the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of 2 fixed combination products, brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% suspension (Azarga, Brinz/Tim) and dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% solution (Dorz/Tim), in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who required a change in therapy due to elevated IOP while receiving IOP-lowering medication. METHODS: This was a one-year, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, parallel-group trial of Brinz/Tim and Dorz/Tim. IOP assessments were taken at 8 and 10 AM at week 2 and months 3 and 9, and at 8 AM, 10 AM, and 4 PM at months 6 and 12. Primary efficacy was a noninferiority comparison of mean IOP at the three month 6 time points. RESULTS: Of the 437 patients enrolled, 220 dosed Brinz/Tim whereas 217 dosed Dorz/Tim twice daily. Brinz/Tim produced IOP-lowering efficacy comparable to Dorz/Tim, with the upper 95% confidence limits for the differences between groups within +1.5 mm Hg at all assessment times, including the month 6 primary efficacy time points, establishing noninferiority. Differences in means numerically favored Brinz/Tim at 9 of 12 study visits and times. The IOP reductions ranged from 7.2 to 9.2 mm Hg for Brinz/Tim and from 7.4 to 8.9 mm Hg for Dorz/Tim. Although a similar overall safety profile was observed between the 2 treatment groups, Brinz/Tim showed significantly less ocular irritation (2.7% vs. 10.6%; P=0.0009) than Dorz/Tim. CONCLUSIONS: Brinz/Tim suspension provides statistically significant and clinically relevant IOP-lowering efficacy that is noninferior to Dorz/Tim. Additionally, Brinz/Tim affords an ocular comfort advantage compared with Dorz/Tim.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/drug therapy , Intraocular Pressure/drug effects , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Thiazines/therapeutic use , Thiophenes/therapeutic use , Timolol/therapeutic use , Administration, Topical , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ocular Hypertension/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Thiazines/adverse effects , Thiophenes/adverse effects , Timolol/adverse effects , Tonometry, Ocular , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...