Moderate sagittal plane deformity patients have similar radiographic and functional outcomes with either anterior or posterior surgery.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the functional and radiographic outcomes of two surgical interventions for adult spinal deformity (ASD): anterior lumbar interbody fusion with anterior column realignment (ALIF-ACR) and posterior approach using Smith-Peterson osteotomy with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation (TLIF-Schwab2). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study included 61 ASD patients treated surgically between 2019 and 2020 at a single tertiary orthopedic specialty hospital. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (ALIF-ACR, 29 patients) and Group 2 (TLIF-Schwab2, 32 patients). Spinopelvic radiographic parameters and functional outcomes were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months postsurgery. RESULTS: Perioperative outcomes favored the ALIF-ACR group, with significantly smaller blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and operative time. Radiographic and functional outcomes were similar for both groups; however, the ALIF-ACR group did have a greater degree of correction in lumbar lordosis at 12 months. Complication profiles varied, with the ALIF-ACR group experiencing mostly hardware-related complications, while the TLIF-Schwab2 group faced dural tears, wound dehiscence, and proximal junctional kyphosis. Both groups had similar revision rates. CONCLUSION: Both ALIF-ACR and TLIF-Schwab2 achieved similar radiographic and functional outcomes in ASD patients with moderate sagittal plane deformity at 1-year follow-up. However, the safety profiles of the two techniques differed. Further research is required to optimize patient selection for each surgical approach, aiming to minimize perioperative complications and reoperation rates in this challenging patient population.

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Russian version of the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire (SOSGOQ2.0).

OBJECTIVE: The most validated health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) questionnaire specific to the metastatic spine cancer population is the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire version 2 (SOSGOQ2.0). The purpose of this study was to translate and validate a Russian version of the SOSGOQ2.0. METHODS: The SOSGOQ2.0 was translated into Russian and cross-culturally adapted. In this study, 64 eligible patients completed the SOSGOQ2.0_RUS along with the EQ-5D 5 Level, SF-36 quality-of-life questionnaires, and visual analog scale for pain assessment scale (VAS). Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha, in which a score of 0.65 or higher is acceptable. Test-retest reliability was evaluated by examining the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: Included in this study were 64 Russian-speaking patients (median age 59 years) with metastatic spine disease. The most common primary tumors were breast, kidney, and prostate cancers. The overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.87, indicating high internal consistency. The overall ICC for the SOSGOQ2.0_RUS was 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.93), indicating high reliability and consistency of the measure. The physical function, pain, and mental health domains of the SF-36 moderately correlated with the same domains of the SOSGOQ2.0_RUS, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.65 to 0.71. CONCLUSIONS: The SOSGOQ2.0_RUS is a reliable and valid questionnaire for assessing the HRQOL in patients with metastatic spinal tumors. The questionnaire showed high internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and good construct validity when compared with other established questionnaires.

Spinolaminar locking plates improve fixation strength compared to pedicle screws: a biomechanical analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Pedicle screw loosening is a significant complication of posterior spinal fixation, particularly among osteoporotic patients and in deformity constructs. In orthopedic trauma surgery, locking plates and screws have revolutionized the fixation of osteoporotic fractures. We have combined the traumatology principle of fixed-angle locking plate fixation with the spine principles of segmental instrumentation. METHODS: A novel spinolaminar locking plate was designed based on morphometric studies of human thoracolumbar vertebrae. The plates were fixed to cadaveric human lumbar spines and connected to form 1-level L1-L2 or L4-L5 constructs and compared to similar pedicle screw constructs. Pure moment testing was performed to assess range of motion before and after 30,000 cycles of cyclic fatigue. Post-fatigue fixture pullout strength was assessed by applying a continuous axial tensile force oriented to the principal axis of the pedicle until pullout was observed. RESULTS: Spinolaminar plate fixation resulted in superior pullout strength compared to pedicle screws (1,065 ± 400N vs. 714 ± 284N, p = 0.028). Spinolaminar plates performed equivalently to pedicle screws in range of motion reduction during flexion/extension and axial rotation. Pedicle screws outperformed the spinolaminar plates in lateral bending. Finally, no spinolaminar constructs failed during cyclic fatigue testing, whereas one pedicle screw construct did. CONCLUSIONS: The spinolaminar locking plate maintained adequate fixation post-fatigue, particularly in flexion/extension and axial rotation compared to pedicle screws. Moreover, spinolaminar plates were superior to pedicle screw fixation with respect to cyclic fatiguing and pullout strength. The spinolaminar plates offer a viable option for posterior lumbar instrumentation in the adult spine.

Conditional survival after surgery for metastatic tumors of the spine: does prognosis change over time?

PURPOSE: Conditional survival (CS) provides a dynamic prediction of patient survival by incorporating the time an individual has already survived given their disease specific characteristics. The objective of the current study was to estimate CS among patients after surgery for spinal cord compression or spinal instability, as well as stratify CS according to relevant patient- and disease-related characteristics. METHODS: The clinical outcomes of 361 patients undergoing surgical management of metastatic spinal tumors were retrospectively analyzed. Stratification of this cohort according to disease and surgery-specific characteristics allowed for univariate and multivariate statistical analyses of our study population. Observed overall and conditional survival estimates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: 12-month conditional survival in patients undergoing surgical management of metastatic spine tumors increased from 57% at baseline to 70% at 24 months following spine surgery. Overall survival (OS) was influenced by CCI grade, Katagiri tumor type, presence of lung metastasis, type of spine surgery, presence of postoperative systemic therapy and ambulatory status at follow-up. Analyses of OS and CS by prognostic strata were similar with exception of stratification by surgery type. Differences in survival between strata tend to converge over time. Unfavorable factors for OS appear to be less relevant after a period of 24 months following spine surgery. CONCLUSION: Patients after surgery for metastatic tumors of the spine can expect a positive trend in conditional survival as survivorship increases. Even patients with a more severe disease can be encouraged with gains in conditional survival over time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV (retrospective cohort study).

Reliability and Validity of Adapted Russian Version of Hospital for Special Surgery Lumbar Spine Surgery Expectations Survey.

Background: Patients' expectations are an important determinant in their decision to undergo lumbar spinal surgery-particularly their expectations of recovery after surgery. The Hospital for Special Surgery Lumbar Spine Surgery Expectations Survey (HSS-LSSES) is one tool used to assess this; however, the original version was only available in English. Objective: We sought to evaluate the reliability and validity of a translated and adapted Russian-language version of the HSS-LSSES. Methods: This was a prospective study of 91 patients with degenerative disc disease who underwent lumbar spine surgery with instrumented fixation at a single institution in Saint Petersburg, Russia. Patients were recruited between December 2019 and February 2021 and asked about their expectations of surgery with a translated and adapted Russian version of the HSS-LSSES. To analyze construct validity, participants also completed disease-specific and general quality-of-life scales (Oswestry Disability Index, European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions, and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs; 2-way random effects model, absolute agreement) were used to determine test-retest reliability of the total score of the Russian HSS-LSSES. Internal consistency was evaluated through the estimation of Cronbach's alpha between the test and retest response of the questionnaire. Results: The test-retest stability of the Russian HSS-LSSES evaluated through the estimation of ICC was found to have good stability. The instrument was shown to have high internal consistency. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that a translated and adapted Russian version of HSS-LSSES had good internal consistency, reliability, construct validity, and no floor and ceiling effects. Therefore, we recommend its use as a tool for evaluating Russian-speaking patients' expectations before lumbar spine surgery.

Comparison of prognostic scales for patients with metastatic spine disease.

This is one-centre retrospective study with the aim to identify the scale, which provides the most accurate prediction of life expectancy in patients with metastatic lesions in spine. A retrospective analysis of clinical data of 138 patients with metastatic spinal tumors. Patients underwent spinal cord decompression and instrumented stabilization of affected area. We evaluated the general condition according to the Karnofsky and ECOG scales, the presence of metastases in the visceral organs, spine and other bones, the neurological status and conduction of the medical therapy before spinal surgery. Observed clinical parameters were converted to Tokuhashi, Tomita, and Katagiri scales. For statistical analysis, software environment R 3.4.1 was used. Assessment of prognostic accuracy was performed using ROC analysis. The Tokuhashi scale showed AUC 0.605 (95% CI 0.586-0.616), Tomita scale showed AUC 0.708 (95% CI 0.573-0.842), Katagiri scale showed AUC 0.650 (95% CI 0.508-0.792). The best results for survival rate predicting after surgical treatment for metastatic spinal lesions were shown the Tomita scale.

Comparison of surgical interventions for degenerative deformities and instability of the spine among elderly patients / A comparação de intervenções cirúrgicas para pacientes idosos com deformações degenerativas e instabilidade da coluna vertebral / Comparación de intervenciones quirúrgicas para pacientes ancianos con deformaciones degenerativas e inestabilidad de la columna vertebral

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the surgical results among elderly patients with degenerative deformities and instability of the spine. Methods: A retrospective study of 437 patients (337 women, 100 men) with a mean age 60. The mean follow-up time was five years. The inclusion criteria were diseases and complications following spinal trauma associated with deformities, degenerative processes, acute pain syndrome, and spinal stenosis with neurological deficit. Four study groups (A, B, C and D) were created and defined by type of surgical intervention. Group A patients (the reference group) - decompression of neural structures on both sides without fixation. Group B - decompression and transpedicular fixation performed without correction of the deformity. Group C - patients operated up to the lower-thoracic region with transpedicular screws, correction of the deformity and decompression of spinal stenosis. Group D - transpedicular fixation up to higher-thoracic region; correction of the deformity and decompression of neurological structures. The mean follow-up time was five years. Results: Group D patients achieved the best outcome. The results observed were good in 57.2% of cases (60 patients); satisfactory in 40% of cases (42 patients); and unsatisfactory in 2.8% of cases (three patients). The worst findings were observed in Group A: satisfactory in 13.4% of cases (15 patients); and, unsatisfactory in 86.6% of cases (97 patients). No good results were observed in this group. Conclusion: The results suggest that performing full deformity correction with transpedicular fixation up to the higher-thoracic region gives the best outcomes for elderly patients, and helps to prevent long-term complications. Evidence level III; Retrospective Comparative Study.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar os resultados da operação em idosos com deformações degenerativas e instabilidade da coluna vertebral. Método: Estudo retrospectivo de 437 pacientes (337 mulheres, 100 homens) com idade média de 60 anos. A duração média da observação foi de cinco anos. Os critérios de inclusão foram doenças e complicações após uma deformidade, processos degenerativos, síndrome da dor aguda e estenose espinhal com déficit neurológico. Quatro grupos de estudo (A, B, C e D) foram criados por tipo de intervenção cirúrgica. Grupo A (grupo de referência): descompressão das estruturas neuronais de ambos os lados sem fixação. Grupo B: descompressão e fixação transpedicular realizadas sem correção. Os pacientes do grupo C foram submetidos à cirurgia para região torácica inferior com parafusos transpediculares, correção e descompressão. Grupo D com fixação transpedicular na região torácica alta; correção total; descompressão de estruturas neurológicas. A duração média da observação foi de cinco anos. Resultados: no grupo D, melhores resultados foram observados. Bons resultados em 57,2% dos casos (60 pacientes); satisfatório em 40% dos casos (42 pacientes); e insatisfatório em 2,8% (3 pacientes). Os piores resultados foram obtidos no Grupo A. Resultados satisfatórios em 13,4% dos casos (15 pacientes); e insatisfatório em 86,6% dos casos (97 pacientes). Conclusão: Os resultados sugerem que a realização de uma correção completa da deformidade com fixação transpedicular na região torácica alta leva a melhores desfechos para pacientes idosos e ajuda a evitar complicações em longo prazo. Nível de evidência III; Estudo Retrospecitvo Comparativo.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Evaluar los resultados quirúrgicos en pacientes ancianos con deformaciones degenerativas e inestabilidad de la columna vertebral. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo de 437 pacientes (337 mujeres, 100 hombres) con edad promedio de 60 años. La duración media de la observación fue de 5 años. Los criterios para la inclusión fueron enfermedades y complicaciones posteriores a traumatismo espinal asociado con deformidades, procesos degenerativos, síndrome de dolor agudo y estenosis espinal con déficit neurológico. Se crearon cuatro grupos de estudio (A, B, C y D) por tipo de intervención quirúrgica. Grupo A (el grupo de referencia): descompresión de las estructuras neuronales en ambos lados sin fijación. Grupo B: descompresión y fijación transpedicular realizadas sin corrección de la deformidad. Los pacientes del grupo C habían sido operados hasta la región torácica inferior con tornillos transpediculares, corrección de la deformidad y descompresión de la estenosis espinal. Grupo D con fijación transpedicular hasta la región torácica superior, corrección de la deformidad y descompresión de estructuras neurológicas. La duración media de la observación fue cinco años. Resultados: En grupo D se observaron mejores resultados. Los resultados observados fueron buenos en 57,2% de los casos (60 pacientes); satisfactorios en 40% de los casos (42 pacientes) e insatisfactorios en 2,8% (tres pacientes). Los peores resultados se obtuvieron en el Grupo A. Resultados satisfactorios en 13,4% de los casos (15 pacientes) e insatisfactorios en 86,6% de los casos (97 pacientes). No se observaron buenos resultados en este grupo. Conclusión: Los resultados sugieren que realizar una corrección de deformidad completa con fijación transpedicular hasta zona torácica superior lleva a mejores resultados para pacientes de edad avanzada y ayuda a evitar complicaciones a largo plazo. Nivel de evidencia III; Estudio Retrospectivo Comparativo.

Acetabular cup version modelling and its clinical applying on plain radiograms.

AIM: To measure the sensitivity and specificity of the cup version assessment by using only anteroposterior hip and pelvis views, evaluate the incidence of inadequate cup version in patients with repeated dislocations after total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: Radiographic retrospective analysis of 2 groups of patients, with follow up of 6-60 mo, after undergoing primary THA. First group of 32 patients (20 female, 12 male) with unilateral THA (32 hips) required early revision arthroplasty for reasons of dislocation. The mean age and mode were 59 (from 38 to 83) and 66 ages respectively. The average body mass index (BMI) was 24.2 (from 17.7 to 36.3), mode 23.9. Second group was consisted of 164 patients (101 female, 63 male) without dislocations during the follow-up period (170 hips). Among them 6 patients required bilateral THA. The mean age was 60 (from 38 to 84) and mode 59. BMI was 24.8 (17.2-36.8), mode 25.2. Clinical significance of the cup anteversion sign was estimated with cross tabulation 2 × 2. RESULTS: The value of the χ2 yates was 10.668 (P < 0.01). Sensitivity of SAI (sign of anteversion insufficiency) was 29% (95%CI: 9%-46%), and specificity was 92% (95%CI: 88%-96%). Relative risk of dislocation in patients with SAI was 3.4 (95%CI: 1.8-6.3). CONCLUSION: This method provides the surgeons with the ability to perform a reliable and simple qualitative assessment of the acetabular component version. It can be useful during patient examination with early loosening of the implant, dislocations, and impingement. Additionally, it can provide necessary information during planning of revision surgery, especially when considering question about cup replacement, although final assessment of the cup position should be done with a computed tomography scan.