Generic implant classification enables comparison across implant designs: the Dutch Arthroplasty Register implant library.

In the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI), the product and batch number of prosthetic components and cement are registered for traceability. Registration of the product number provides opportunities to extend the information about a specific prosthesis. All product numbers used from the beginning of the registration in 2007 were characterized to develop and maintain an implant library.The Scientific Advisory Board developed a core-set that contains the most important characteristics needed to form an implant library. The final core-set contains the brand name, type, coating and material of the prosthesis. In total, 35 676 product numbers were classified, resulting in a complete implant library of all product numbers used in the LROI.To improve quality of the data and increase convenience of registration, the LROI implemented barcode scanning for data entry into the database. In 2017, 82% of prosthetic components and cement stickers had a GS1 barcode. The remaining product stickers used HIBCC barcodes and custom-made barcodes.With this implant library, implants can be grouped for analyses at group level, e.g. evaluation of the effect of a material of a prosthesis on survival of the implant. Apart from that, the implant library can be used for data quality control within the LROI database.The implant library reduces the registration burden and increases accuracy of the database. Such a system will facilitate new designs (learning from the past) and thus improve implant quality and ultimately patient safety. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180063.

Higher mid-term revision rates of posterior stabilized compared with cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasties: 133,841 cemented arthroplasties for osteoarthritis in the Netherlands in 2007-2016.

Background and purpose - The preference for a cruciate retaining (CR) or posterior stabilized (PS) TKA (total knee arthroplasty) system varies greatly between Dutch hospitals, independent of patient characteristics. We examined mid-term revision rates for men and women of different age categories. Patients and methods - We included all 133,841 cemented fixed-bearing primary CR or PS TKAs for osteoarthritis reported in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) in 2007-2016. Revision procedures were defined as minor when only insert and/or patella were revised and as major when fixed components (tibia and femur) were revised or removed. 8-year all-cause revision rates of CR and PS TKAs were calculated using competing-risk analyses. Cox-regression analyses were performed, adjusted for age at surgery, sex, ASA -score, and previous operations. Results - PS TKAs were 1.5 (95% CI 1.4-1.6) times more likely to be revised within 8 years of the primary procedure, compared with CR TKAs. When stratified for sex and age category, 8-year revision rate of PS TKAs in men <60 years was 13% (CI 11-15), compared to 7.2% (CI 6.1-8.5) of CR TKAs. Less prominent differences were found in older men and women. For men <60 years differences were found for minor (CR 1.8% (CI 1.4-2.5); PS 3.7% (CI 3.0-4.7)) and major revisions (CR 4.2% (CI 3.3-5.3); PS 7.0% (CI 5.6-8.7)). Interpretation - Patients who received a cemented fixed-bearing primary PS TKA for osteoarthritis are more likely to undergo either a minor or a major revision within 8 years. This is especially prominent for younger men.

More than 95% completeness of reported procedures in the population-based Dutch Arthroplasty Register.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A complete and correct national arthroplasty register is indispensable for the quality of arthroplasty outcome studies. We evaluated the coverage, completeness, and validity of the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) for hip and knee arthroplasty. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The LROI is a nationwide population-based registry with information on joint arthroplasties in the Netherlands. Completeness of entered procedures was validated in 2 ways: (1) by comparison with the number of reimbursements for arthroplasty surgeries (Vektis database), and (2) by comparison with data from hospital information systems (HISs). The validity was examined by conducting checks on missing or incorrectly coded values in the LROI. RESULTS: The LROI contains over 300,000 hip and knee arthroplasties performed since 2007. Coverage of all Dutch hospitals (n = 100) was reached in 2012. Completeness of registered procedures was 98% for hip arthroplasty and 96% for knee arthroplasty in 2012, based on Vektis data. Based on comparison with data from the HIS, completeness of registered procedures was 97% for primary total hip arthroplasty and 96% for primary knee arthroplasty in 2013. Completeness of revision arthroplasty was 88% for hips and 90% for knees in 2013. The proportion of missing or incorrectly coded values of variables was generally less than 0.5%, except for encrypted personal identity numbers (17% of which were missing) and ASA scores (10% of which were missing). INTERPRETATION: The LROI now contains over 300,000 hip and knee arthroplasty procedures, with coverage of all hospitals. It has a good level of completeness (i.e. more than 95% for primary hip and knee arthroplasty procedures in 2012 and 2013) and the database has high validity.

[Evidence-based hip prostheses: more high-quality prostheses used after introduction of a classification system]. / Bewezen goed presterende heupprothesen: meer bewezen goede prothesen geplaatst na invoering classificatiesysteem.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of an evidence-based classification list on use of total hip prostheses of proven quality in the Netherlands. DESIGN: Observational study. METHOD: The Netherlands Orthopaedic Association (NOV) drew up a classification list for total hip prostheses in 2013. This classification list considered total hip prostheses to be of proven quality when the average percent of revision was ≤ 10% after 10 years of follow-up (category 1A) or ≤ 5% after 5 years of follow-up (category 1B). Data from the Dutch National Orthopaedic Implant Registry Register (LROI) were used to determine the effect of the classification list on the use of hip prostheses of proven quality in the Netherlands. All patients, operations and prosthesis characteristics of the hip prostheses used in the Netherlands were registered in the LROI. We selected details of all interventions in which a hip prosthesis was implanted in patients with 'osteoarthritis' as primary diagnosis between 2012 and 2014 from the LROI. The prostheses could be classified as 1A, 1B or 'not 1A or 1B' by means of the implant code of the acetabular and femoral components. We took 2012 as the reference year. RESULTS: In the reference year, 84% of the acetabular components and 94% of the femoral components were category 1A or 1B. In 2013 these percentages had increased to 89% and 95%, respectively; in 2014 the percentages had increased to 92% and 97%. CONCLUSION: After implementation of the NOV classification list there was an increase in the percentage of total hip prostheses of proven quality, which means that patient care has become better and safer.