Meta-analysis examining impact of age on overall survival with pemetrexed for the treatment of advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: In clinical practice, elderly patients are often undertreated relative to younger patients. This meta-analysis was designed to determine whether older patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) could derive an overall survival (OS) benefit from pemetrexed treatment comparable to that experienced by younger patients in the first-line, second-line, or maintenance settings. METHODS: Data from 2671 patients with non-squamous NSCLC participating in four pemetrexed phase III studies were included in a meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Studies included were: JMEI (second-line pemetrexed, N=399); JMDB (first-line pemetrexed/cisplatin, N=1252); JMEN (pemetrexed maintenance after non-pemetrexed/platinum doublet, N=481); and PARAMOUNT (pemetrexed maintenance after first-line pemetrexed/cisplatin, N=539). Patients were predominantly Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) 0/1. The ratio of OS hazard ratio (HR) (pemetrexed versus control) for younger patients over that for older patients within each study was used as the measure of the differential effect of pemetrexed. Data were examined using age cutoffs of 65 and 70 years. RESULTS: Among the four studies, 32% of patients were aged ≥65 years and 14% were aged ≥70 years. The test of heterogeneity among studies was non-significant for subgroups defined by age 65 (P=0.083) and age 70 (P=0.848). The pooled ratio of the OS HR (pemetrexed versus control) in patients <65years to that in patients ≥65 years was 0.92 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.67-1.25). Similar results were seen for the analysis using the age 70 years cut-off (0.80 [95% CI 0.62-1.04]). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non-squamous NSCLC with good PS, the effect of pemetrexed on OS was not found to be different in younger and older patients undergoing treatment in the first-line, second-line, or maintenance settings.

Comparison of KRAS genotype: therascreen assay vs. LNA-mediated qPCR clamping assay.

BACKGROUND: Kirsten rat sarcoma virus (KRAS) wild-type status determined using a locked nucleic acid (LNA)-mediated quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) clamping assay (LNA assay) predicted response to therapy in the CRYSTAL (Cetuximab Combined With Irinotecan in First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer) study. A companion KRAS diagnostic tool has been developed for routine clinical use (QIAGEN therascreen kit) (QIAGEN Manchester Ltd, Manchester, UK). We wanted to assess the concordance between the validated US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therascreen assay and the LNA assay in determining the KRAS status of a subset of patients enrolled in the CRYSTAL study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: DNA extracted from paraffin-embedded tumor sections was tested for KRAS status using the therascreen assay. Efficacy data from the CRYSTAL study were assessed to determine if the overall survival (OS) hazard ratio for cetuximab in patients identified as having KRAS wild-type status using the therascreen assay was equivalent to that in patients identified as KRAS wild-type using the LNA assay. This was determined by assessing if the concordance between the therascreen assay and the LNA assay met the minimum threshold (prespecified as 0.8) to achieve a significant difference in the OS hazard ratio in favor of the cetuximab + FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin [folinic acid], irinotecan) arm in the KRAS wild-type population as identified using the therascreen assay. RESULTS: Of the 148 samples determined to be KRAS wild-type (therascreen assay), 141 (95.3%) samples were also KRAS wild-type (LNA assay) and 7 samples (4.7%) were KRAS mutant (LNA assay). The prespecified primary concordance measure p was 141/148 = 0.953 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.905-0.981). The concordance was statistically significantly higher than the prespecified threshold of 0.8 for concordance between the therascreen assay and the LNA assay. Consistent with the concordance exceeding the prespecified threshold, the OS hazard ratio (cetuximab + FOLFIRI arm vs. FOLFIRI arm) in the KRAS wild-type population, determined by the therascreen assay, supported a significant benefit for cetuximab (ie, the 95% CI excluded 1) and was comparable to the OS hazard ratio observed in the CRYSTAL study KRAS wild-type population (LNA assay) even after adjustment for potentially confounding baseline variables. CONCLUSION: These results support the utility of the therascreen assay for identifying patients who may benefit from cetuximab therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Subgroup identification based on differential effect search--a recursive partitioning method for establishing response to treatment in patient subpopulations.

We propose a novel recursive partitioning method for identifying subgroups of subjects with enhanced treatment effects based on a differential effect search algorithm. The idea is to build a collection of subgroups by recursively partitioning a database into two subgroups at each parent group, such that the treatment effect within one of the two subgroups is maximized compared with the other subgroup. The process of data splitting continues until a predefined stopping condition has been satisfied. The method is similar to 'interaction tree' approaches that allow incorporation of a treatment-by-split interaction in the splitting criterion. However, unlike other tree-based methods, this method searches only within specific regions of the covariate space and generates multiple subgroups of potential interest. We develop this method and provide guidance on key topics of interest that include generating multiple promising subgroups using different splitting criteria, choosing optimal values of complexity parameters via cross-validation, and addressing Type I error rate inflation inherent in data mining applications using a resampling-based method. We evaluate the operating characteristics of the procedure using a simulation study and illustrate the method with a clinical trial example.

A two-stage sample size recalculation procedure for placebo- and active-controlled non-inferiority trials.

Many non-inferiority trials of a test treatment versus an active control may also, if ethical, incorporate a placebo arm. Inclusion of a placebo arm enables a direct assessment of assay sensitivity. It also allows construction of a non-inferiority test that avoids the problematic specification of an absolute non-inferiority margin, and instead evaluates whether the test treatment preserves a pre-specified proportion of the effect of the active control over placebo. We describe a two-stage procedure for sample size recalculation in such a setting that maintains the desired power more closely than a fixed sample approach when the magnitude of the effect of the active control differs from that anticipated. We derive an allocation rule for randomization under which the procedure preserves the type I error rate, and show that this coincides with that previously presented for optimal allocation of the sample size among the three treatment arms.

Semen and sperm reference ranges for men 45 years of age and older.

The most widely used reference values for human semen and sperm variables were developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) to help assess the fertility status of men interested in reproduction (typically a younger population). In this retrospective analysis, data from a large population of men aged 45 years or older were analyzed to derive semen and sperm reference ranges for an older population. Baseline semen samples were obtained from 1174 men with no or mild erectile dysfunction (ED) during the screening phase of two clinical trials evaluating the effects of a drug on human spermatogenesis. The median values and 95% reference ranges for 4 measured semen and sperm parameters (semen volume, sperm concentration, sperm motility, and sperm morphology) and 1 derived parameter (total sperm count) were calculated for the population and by age quartile. These references ranges were compared to established WHO reference values. Associations between the semen and sperm parameters and smoking status, alcohol use, and serum hormone concentrations were also analyzed. The mean age was 52.9 years (range: 45-80). Median semen volume, sperm motility, and sperm morphology parameters declined significantly with age. Only 46% of study subjects had baseline values for semen and sperm parameters that met or surpassed all the WHO reference values. This is the first study to statistically derive semen reference ranges from a large population of men aged 45 years or older. The observation that less than half the men in this study met all 4 WHO reference values for measured semen and sperm parameters underscores the need for age-specific reference ranges.

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover study to evaluate patient preference between tadalafil and sildenafil.

PURPOSE: To assess patient preference for erectile dysfunction treatment between either sildenafil or tadalafil, each administered with their respective dosing instructions, and to evaluate preference for either sildenafil or tadalafil dosing instructions during tadalafil therapy. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, crossover study consisting of four treatment arms. Because the dosing instructions for sildenafil and tadalafil are different, a unique methodology using sham placebo arms was employed to maintain the blind. To assess drug preference, 219 patients were randomized to either sildenafil 50 mg or tadalafil 20 mg, with dosing instructions reflecting their respective product profiles. To assess dosing instruction preference during tadalafil therapy, 46 patients were randomized to tadalafil 20 mg with either tadalafil or sildenafil dosing instructions. After 12 weeks, patients were crossed-over. After 4 weeks of each treatment, all patients following sildenafil dosing instructions were offered the opportunity for an upward dose titration. In a double-blind fashion, all patients who requested an upward titration received additional capsules. To mimic the pattern of dose usage observed in clinical practice, the number of patients who received additional double-blind active medication was limited to 35% of patients taking sildenafil in each treatment period in each country. Following the crossover treatment period, patients chose their preferred double-blind treatment with dosing instructions to receive in the 12-week extension period. RESULTS: In the drug preference assessment, 132 of 181 (73%) evaluable patients chose to receive tadalafil (p < 0.001) during the extension period. In the dosing instruction preference assessment, 24 of 36 (67%) evaluable patients preferred tadalafil with tadalafil dosing instructions (p = 0.046). Sildenafil and tadalafil were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: In the doses utilized in this study, 73% of patients preferred tadalafil with tadalafil dosing instructions for the treatment of their erectile dysfunction over sildenafil with sildenafil dosing instructions. During tadalafil therapy, 67% of patients preferred tadalafil dosing instructions over sildenafil dosing instructions.

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover study of patient preference for tadalafil 20 mg or sildenafil citrate 50 mg during initiation of treatment for erectile dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Tadalafil is a phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor approved in >30 countries for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). It has been shown to improve erectile function compared with placebo in Phase III studies, but clinical experience comparing tadalafil with the PDE5 inhibitor sildenafil citrate is lacking. OBJECTIVE: This study compared patient preference for tadalafil 20 mg or sildenafil 50 mg during initial treatment for ED. It also compared the tolerability of the 2 agents at these doses. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, fixed-dose, 2-period crossover trial took place at 13 sites in the United States and Germany. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 4 weeks of treatment with tadalafil 20 mg or sildenafil 50 mg, followed by the alternative treatment, to be taken as needed up to once daily before sexual activity. RESULTS: The study enrolled 215 men with ED, 109 randomized to the tadalafil-sildenafil sequence and 106 to the sildenafil-tadalafil sequence. Their mean age was 49.8 years; 84.7% were sildenafil naive and 15.3% had undergone a previous inadequate trial of sildenafil. Most patients had moderate ED (60.5%) of >or=1 year's duration (74.9%). Of 190 evaluable patients, 126 (66.3%) preferred to initiate treatment with tadalafil, compared with 64 (33.7%) with sildenafil (P < 0.001). Patients' preference did not differ by age, duration of ED, treatment sequence, or previous sildenafil exposure. Both medications were well tolerated, with no significant differences in the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. Headache (11.2% tadalafil, 8.8% sildenafil), dyspepsia (6.0% and 4.2%, respectively), nasopharyngitis (4.7% and 2.8%), and flushing (2.8% and 4.7%) were the most common adverse events. The rate of ocular disturbances was low: 1 patient experienced intermittent bilateral reduction in visual acuity with tadalafil, and 2 exhibited conjunctival hyperemia or eyelid edema with sildenafil. CONCLUSIONS: Tadalafil 20 mg was preferred to sildenafil 50 mg for the initiation of ED therapy in this study population. Both medications were well tolerated.

Time course of the interaction between tadalafil and nitrates.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to determine the time course of nitrate interaction with tadalafil, a phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) inhibitor with a half-life (t(1/2)) of 17.5 h. BACKGROUND: The PDE5 inhibitors augment the blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects of nitrates, yet the time course of this interaction is unclear. Recent guidelines from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association recommend that nitrates be withheld for 24 h after taking sildenafil (t(1/2) = 4 h). METHODS: Male subjects (n = 150) received seven consecutive daily doses of placebo or tadalafil (20 mg). On day 7 and beyond, subjects received repeated doses of sublingual nitroglycerin (0.4 mg) after the last dose of placebo or tadalafil. After a 10- to 21-day washout period, subjects crossed over to either placebo or tadalafil, and nitrate dosing was repeated. RESULTS: In response to nitroglycerin at 4, 8, and 24 h, standing systolic BP fell below 85 mm Hg in more subjects on tadalafil compared with placebo (p < 0.05), with no difference in the response to nitroglycerin at 48, 72, and 96 h (p > 0.2). Similar observations were made for standing diastolic BP <45 mm Hg, decrease in systolic BP >30 mm Hg, and decrease in diastolic BP >20 mm Hg. Nitroglycerin also evoked greater mean maximal decreases in standing systolic BP at 8 and 24 h after taking tadalafil versus placebo (p < 0.02), with no significant difference at 48, 72, or 96 h (p > 0.49). CONCLUSIONS: The hemodynamic interaction between tadalafil and sublingual nitroglycerin lasted 24 h, but was not seen at 48 h and beyond. Similar to other PDE5 inhibitors, tadalafil should not be administered in combination with organic nitrates.

Sample-size redetermination for repeated measures studies.

Clinical trialists recently have shown interest in two-stage procedures for updating the sample-size calculation at an interim point in a trial. Because many clinical trials involve repeated measures designs, it is desirable to have available practical two-stage procedures for such designs. Shih and Gould (1995, Statistics in Medicine 14, 2239-2248) discuss sample-size redetermination for repeated measures studies but under a highly simplified setup. We develop two-stage procedures under the general mixed linear model, allowing for dropouts and missed visits. We present a range of procedures and compare their Type I error and power by simulation. We find that, in general, the achieved power is brought considerably closer to the required level without inflating the Type I error rate. We also derive an inflation factor that ensures the power requirement is more closely met.