ABSTRACT
AIM: To describe stroke services currently offered in New Zealand hospitals and compare service provision in urban and non-urban settings. METHOD: An online questionnaire was sent to stroke lead clinicians at all New Zealand District Health Boards (DHBs). Questions covered number and location of stroke inpatients, stroke service configuration, use of guidelines/protocols, staffing mix, access to staff education, and culture appropriate care. RESULTS: There were responses from all 20 DHBs. Differences between urban and non-urban hospitals included: access to acute stroke units (55.6% non-urban vs 100% urban; p=0.013), stroke clinical nurse specialists (50% vs 90%; p=0.034), stroke clot retrieval (38.9% vs 80%; p=0.037) and Pacific support services (55.6% vs 100%; p=0.030). There were also differences in carer training (66.7% non-urban vs 100% urban; p=0.039) and goal-specific rehabilitation plans in the community (61.1% vs 100%; p=0.023). Access to TIA services, stroke rehabilitation units, early supported discharge, psychologists, continuing staff education, and culturally responsive stroke care were suboptimal irrespective of hospital location. CONCLUSION: Hospital location is associated with differences in stroke services provision across New Zealand and ongoing work is required to optimise consistent access to best practice care. These results, in conjunction with an ongoing (REGIONS Care) study, will be used to determine whether this affects patient outcomes.
